School Assessment: Choosing a Text for the Response to Text Task
A student, Nikos, must complete an internal response-to-text assessment. He may choose between a short story by a contemporary Greek-Australian author, a newspaper opinion piece on the Greek economic crisis, and a poem with dense metaphor. Nikos is confident with vocabulary but struggles to identify the author's stance and to support claims with evidence. He has three weeks and one draft submission for feedback. His teacher notes that the task rewards analysis of how meaning is made, not summary, and that the chosen text must allow him to discuss at least two language features. He is tempted by the poem because it is short.
1. Which text should Nikos choose, and why?
Read the worked answer
The opinion piece is the strongest choice for his profile. It has an explicit, findable stance (the author's position on austerity or migration policy), which directly targets his weakness in identifying authorial viewpoint. It also supplies clear rhetorical features - modality, emotive lexis, rhetorical questions, statistics used persuasively - so he can meet the two-language-features requirement with evidence he can quote. The poem is short but dense; dense metaphor is the hardest place to demonstrate evidence-based claims, and length is not the constraint that matters. The short story is viable but its stance is often implicit, which plays to his weakness. Choosing the opinion piece converts his difficulty into the task's core skill.
2. Outline how Nikos should structure his response to show analysis rather than summary.
Read the worked answer
He should open with a one-sentence thesis naming the author's stance and one technique used to advance it. Each body paragraph should follow claim → quoted evidence → effect on reader → link to stance. For example: the author's use of inclusive «εμείς» constructs solidarity, positioning readers to accept the proposed policy. He must avoid narrating what the article says; every paragraph should answer 'how does this language make the stance persuasive?' He should include one paragraph acknowledging a counter-position the author anticipates and how the author neutralises it, which demonstrates evaluative reading. A short conclusion should weigh how effective the techniques are, not restate the summary.
3. How should he use the single draft-for-feedback opportunity?
Read the worked answer
He should submit a complete draft, not a fragment, so feedback addresses structure and argument as well as expression. Before submitting, he should self-annotate: mark each paragraph's claim and the evidence supporting it, and flag any paragraph that is summary. He should ask the teacher two specific questions, e.g. 'Is my thesis about stance clear?' and 'Have I explained effect, or only named techniques?' This turns generic feedback into targeted revision. He should reserve the final week to act on feedback rather than to start new research.