The Safeguarding Disclosure
You are a support worker visiting a 34-year-old man with a mild learning disability in his flat. He tells you his brother, who visits most days and manages his money, has been taking £40 a week from his account without permission and has shouted at him and pushed him once. He says he does not want you to tell anyone because his brother will be angry and he does not want to lose contact with his only family. He has capacity to make decisions about his finances. His rent is now two weeks overdue and he has stopped going to his weekly social group because he cannot afford the bus fare.
1. Analyse the safeguarding issues and explain how capacity, consent and risk interact here.
Read the worked answer
Issues. This is financial abuse (unauthorised taking of money by a family member in a position of trust) combined with an element of physical abuse (the push) and possible coercive control (shouting, fear of anger, isolation). The consequences are concrete: rent arrears create a risk of tenancy loss and homelessness, and withdrawal from the social group removes support and increases isolation - a classic pattern in which abuse narrows the person's world.
Capacity and consent. Having capacity to make decisions about finances does not mean the situation requires no action, and it does not mean his wishes are irrelevant. Capacity is decision-specific: he may have capacity regarding his money while still being subject to undue influence or coercion from his brother. The Mental Capacity Act presumption of capacity applies, but the assessment should consider whether the brother's pressure affects his ability to weigh information freely - a person can be coerced while technically retaining capacity. His wish not to disclose must be respected as far as possible, but it is not absolute: safeguarding duties mean that where there is risk of significant harm, particularly to an adult with care and support needs, information may need to be shared without consent, and he should be told this honestly.
Risk. Risks include escalation of physical abuse, financial harm and tenancy loss, and loss of social contact. Against these sit the risks of acting: family breakdown, loss of his only visitor, and distress. The analysis should weigh these and not assume that intervention is automatically safer.
2. What would you actually do in the next 24 hours, and how would you balance his wishes against your duty of care?
Read the worked answer
Immediately. Stay calm, listen, and do not promise confidentiality I cannot keep. Record what he said in his own words, factually and promptly, including dates and amounts where known. Check immediate safety: is he safe tonight, does he have money for food, is the brother due to visit? Discuss with him what he wants to happen and what could be done - for example, contacting the bank about the account, exploring a lasting power of attorney or appointeeship review, and getting advice on the rent arrears.
In the next 24 hours. Discuss with my manager and follow the organisation's safeguarding procedure, making a safeguarding adult referral if thresholds are met. Be transparent with him about what I am doing and why, and involve him in decisions as far as possible. Contact the housing provider or a money advice service about the arrears, with his agreement where possible. Consider whether the police need to be involved - the push is an assault - but the decision should be proportionate and discussed with him. Ensure his social group remains accessible, for example by exploring transport support.
Balancing wishes and duty of care. His wishes carry real weight and should shape how, not merely whether, action is taken. But duty of care means I cannot collude in concealment of abuse, particularly where his tenancy and safety are at risk. The defensible position is: be honest about what I must share, share only what is necessary, keep him informed, support him to maintain contact with his brother if he chooses while addressing the abuse, and document the reasoning at each step. If he refuses all action, record his decision, ensure he knows how to contact me, and keep the situation under review rather than closing it.