Choosing Between Two Listening Texts
A teacher is assembling the Unit 4 listening section of a trial exam. She has two candidate recordings, both about 2 minutes 30 seconds, both in Italian, both on the theme of Il lavoro. Text A is a radio interview with a young woman who moved from Sicily to Milan for work; she speaks at natural speed with some regional colour, uses connectives like però, infatti, d'altra parte, and gives reasons for her decisions. Text B is a studio announcement read slowly and evenly, listing five facts about youth unemployment with no opinion or argument. The teacher wants the section to discriminate between students at different levels. She has 12 students: 4 are strong, 5 are mid-range, 3 struggle with listening. Both texts would be played twice.
1. Which text better serves the purpose of discriminating between students, and why?
Read the worked answer
Text A is the better discriminator. Discrimination depends on whether the task separates students who understand gist and inference from those who only catch isolated words.
Text A contains:
- Natural speed and connected speech, which challenges weaker listeners but is manageable for strong ones.
- Signalling words (però, infatti, d'altra parte) that carry the argument's structure. A student who hears only content words will miss the contrast between the push factors in Sicily and the pull factors in Milan.
- Reasons and opinions, which allow higher-order questions (Perché ha deciso di trasferirsi? Qual è il suo atteggiamento verso Milano?).
Text B is a list of facts delivered slowly. It measures recall of discrete items, not comprehension of discourse. Strong students and mid-range students would likely score almost identically, and the item would not spread the cohort. Its only advantage is accessibility for the three weaker listeners - but that is a reason to scaffold, not to choose a non-discriminating text.
2. The teacher worries Text A will be too hard for the three struggling students. Propose how to keep Text A while making the section fair, and explain the trade-off.
Read the worked answer
Keep Text A but vary the item difficulty rather than the text. A well-built section can contain items at several levels on the same recording:
- Literal items for weaker students: Dove viveva prima di trasferirsi? - answerable from one clear phrase.
- Inferential items for mid-range students: Perché ha lasciato la Sicilia? - requires connecting two statements.
- Evaluative items for strong students: Come valuta la sua esperienza a Milano? - requires interpreting tone and hedged language.
The trade-off is that the same recording must be heard by everyone, so the section as a whole is not easier - only the entry point is lower. Weaker students can earn partial credit on literal items; strong students are separated by the harder items. This is fairer than substituting a simpler text, which would cap the top of the range.
One caution: the teacher should ensure the harder items do not depend on regional pronunciation alone. If a Sicilian vowel or a fast idiom blocks comprehension for reasons unrelated to listening skill, that is noise, not discrimination.