AWS CWI 9-Yr Recert study plan
AWS CWI 9-Yr Recert · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Nondestructive Examination Coordination Endorsement & Welding Coordination and QA Endorsement
Map every clause in the two 10%-weight coordination domains to a one-line recall cue, so the highest-value material is studied first
Draft a coordination workflow checklist covering NDE method sequencing, hold points, and reporting chain between inspector, coordinator, and QA
Explain aloud, without notes, how a weld inspection plan is built from drawing requirements through acceptance criteria and final documentation
Identify the five most common causes of coordination failure (missed hold points, wrong method, wrong timing, calibration lapse, incomplete records) and write a corrective action for each
Your checkpoint
A one-page coordination checklist plus a 20-term glossary covering both 10% domains, self-scored at 80% or better on a closed-book recall quiz
Nondestructive Examination Coordination Endorsement & Welding Coordination and QA Endorsement
Sequence a full NDE program for a multi-pass groove weld from root to final acceptance, naming method, timing, and required surface condition at each step
Compare personnel qualification routes across the endorsements and state which certification level may perform and which may approve
Build a calibration and equipment-verification log template with intervals, tolerance checks, and sign-off fields
Write three nonconformance scenarios and the disposition path each would follow under a quality program
Your checkpoint
A completed NDE sequencing worksheet for two weld configurations plus a filled-in sample calibration log with all fields exercised
Magnetic Particle Testing Endorsement & Penetrant Testing (PT) Endorsement
Describe the magnetization and penetrant application techniques, and match each to the defect orientation and surface condition it best reveals
Calculate the effective current or field requirement for a given part geometry and explain how part shape changes the needed technique
List the steps of each method in order and identify where an error causes a false indication or a missed defect
Interpret typical acceptance criteria language and decide accept, reject, or re-inspect for six written indication descriptions
Your checkpoint
A method-selection decision table covering both surface methods, plus six written indication calls scored against the acceptance criteria with reasoning recorded
Structural Steel (D1.1) Endorsement & Bridge Welding (D1.5) Endorsement
Trace the structural steel code path from joint classification through procedure qualification, welder qualification, fabrication tolerances, and inspection acceptance
Compare the bridge welding endorsement against general structural steel, listing where requirements are stricter and why
Classify ten written joint descriptions by type, position, and required qualification test
Explain the difference between procedure qualification and performance qualification using a worked example for each
Your checkpoint
A side-by-side comparison chart of the structural steel and bridge endorsements with at least 12 requirement rows and a written note on each difference
Structural Aluminum (D1.2) Endorsement & Railroad (D15.1) Endorsement
Explain how aluminum's thermal conductivity, oxide layer, and lack of color change on heating alter technique compared with steel
State the preweld cleaning, storage, and filler selection rules for aluminum and describe the consequence of each being ignored
Outline the railroad welding endorsement's qualification, inspection, and record-keeping expectations and contrast them with structural steel
Predict five defect types most likely in each of the two metals or applications and name the test that finds each
Your checkpoint
A defect-prediction matrix for aluminum and railroad welding with at least ten entries, each naming cause, likely location, and detection method
Aerospace (D17.1) Endorsement & Pipeline (API 1104) Endorsement
Summarize the aerospace endorsement's emphasis on procedure control, cleanliness, documentation traceability, and qualification of both process and personnel
Outline the pipeline standard's girth weld acceptance approach, including how defect type and size drive rejection
Compare radiographic and ultrasonic evaluation roles in each of the two domains and state when each is preferred
Answer 25 mixed practice questions across both domains and categorize every miss by root cause
Your checkpoint
A root-cause log of every missed practice question with the corrected fact written out, plus a one-page summary of the two domains' governing philosophies
ASME BPVC Section IX (B31.1) (B31.3) Endorsement & ISO Standard Endorsement
Distinguish how the ASME code and the ISO standard each assign responsibility for procedure qualification, and identify the records each requires
Map the pressure piping scope differences between the power and process piping sections to their inspection implications
Compare ISO qualification and acceptance concepts against the ASME approach using a two-column analysis
Resolve six written scenario questions where the applicable code changes the accept or reject outcome
Your checkpoint
A code-comparison matrix covering ASME and ISO on qualification, essential variables, acceptance, and documentation, validated by correctly resolving all six scenarios
Structural Steel (D1.1) Endorsement & Bridge Welding (D1.5) Endorsement & Nondestructive Examination Coordination Endorsement & Welding Coordination and QA Endorsement
Re-run every previously missed practice item across all twelve domains and confirm each corrected fact from memory
Complete two timed mixed-domain practice sets and analyze score by domain to find remaining weak areas
Rehearse the coordination and quality workflows end to end, narrating each decision point aloud
Consolidate all deliverables into a single indexed reference binder organized by domain number
Your checkpoint
A full-length timed practice exam scored by domain with every miss corrected and logged, plus a completed indexed binder covering all twelve domains
Milestones
Week 2: Score 80% or better on a closed-book quiz covering only the two 10% coordination domains, and produce a coordination checklist a colleague could follow without asking questions
Week 4: Correctly classify at least 9 of 10 written joint descriptions and explain procedure versus performance qualification with no notes
Week 6: Score 75% or better on a 25-question mixed set across aerospace and pipeline, with a written root cause for every miss
Week 8: Score 80% or better overall on a full-length timed practice exam with no domain below 70%, and confirm the indexed binder is complete