BC-ADM study plan
BC-ADM · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Clinical assessment and diagnosis & Pharmacologic therapy and medication management
Map every diagnostic criterion for diabetes and prediabetes (A1C, fasting glucose, 2-hour OGTT, random glucose with symptoms) onto a one-page comparison table you write from memory, then verify against a current guideline summary
Differentiate type 1, type 2, gestational, and secondary diabetes by listing the clinical and laboratory features that separate them, including antibody and C-peptide interpretation
Outline the initial pharmacologic decision for a newly diagnosed adult with type 2 diabetes, stating which comorbidities (atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, chronic kidney disease) shift the choice of agent
Explain the mechanism, glucose-lowering potency, weight effect, hypoglycemia risk, and key adverse effects of metformin, sulfonylureas, and insulin secretagogues in your own words
Your checkpoint
A two-page written diagnostic and initial-therapy summary covering all four goals, scored against your reference source with every discrepancy corrected
Pharmacologic therapy and medication management & Clinical assessment and diagnosis
Compare GLP-1 receptor agonists, dual GIP/GLP-1 agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors, DPP-4 inhibitors, and insulin regimens on glycemic efficacy, weight effect, cardiovascular and kidney outcomes, contraindications, and monitoring requirements
Construct a stepwise insulin initiation and titration plan for a patient not at goal on oral agents, specifying starting dose logic, titration interval, and hypoglycemia counseling points
Identify drug classes and specific agents that require dose adjustment or avoidance in chronic kidney disease and in hepatic impairment
Practice interpreting mixed laboratory panels (A1C with anemia or hemoglobinopathy, discordant fasting and postprandial values) and state what each pattern suggests
Your checkpoint
A completed drug-class comparison grid (agent class by efficacy, weight, hypoglycemia, organ-specific cautions) plus five worked lab-interpretation vignettes with written rationales
Diabetes self-management education and support & Nutrition, physical activity, and weight management
Draft a structured diabetes self-management education and support session outline that addresses healthy coping, problem solving, and medication-taking behavior, and specify when the four critical time points for referral occur
Calculate and interpret carbohydrate-to-insulin ratios and correction factors for a sample patient, showing the arithmetic and the safety checks you would apply
Apply behavior-change counseling techniques (motivational interviewing, goal setting, teach-back) to a written case of a patient with low engagement
Build a physical activity prescription that accounts for baseline fitness, neuropathy, retinopathy, and hypoglycemia risk during and after exercise
Your checkpoint
A complete written education session plan plus a worked insulin-dose calculation worksheet with three practice cases and answer rationales
Nutrition, physical activity, and weight management & Diabetes self-management education and support
Compare macronutrient approaches (Mediterranean, low-carbohydrate, plant-based, higher-protein) on glycemic and weight outcomes and state which patients each suits or does not suit
Design a weight-management plan for a patient with obesity and type 2 diabetes that sequences nutrition, activity, behavioral support, pharmacotherapy, and metabolic surgery criteria
Evaluate popular dietary patterns and supplements for safety and evidence quality, and prepare plain-language talking points to counter common misinformation
Assess a patient's readiness for reducing or deprescribing glucose-lowering therapy after substantial weight loss or improved control
Your checkpoint
A one-page individualized nutrition and weight-management care plan for a specified patient profile, with justification for each recommendation and cited evidence strength
Diabetes technology and glycemic monitoring & Diabetes technology and glycemic monitoring
Interpret continuous glucose monitoring reports (time in range, time below range, glucose management indicator, variability, ambulatory glucose profile patterns) and translate each metric into a clinical action
Compare self-monitoring of blood glucose, continuous glucose monitoring, and intermittently scanned systems on accuracy, indications, patient-selection factors, and insurance documentation requirements
Explain insulin pump therapy and automated insulin delivery in terms of candidate selection, settings, troubleshooting, and safety
Set and adjust glycemic targets individualized by age, comorbidity, hypoglycemia risk, and life expectancy, and state when A1C alone is insufficient
Your checkpoint
A written interpretation of two full continuous glucose monitoring report scenarios, each with three prioritized therapy changes and the metric that justified each change
Complications, comorbidities, and cardiometabolic risk reduction & Complications, comorbidities, and cardiometabolic risk reduction
Screen for and stage microvascular complications (retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy) with correct screening intervals and referral triggers
Assess and manage cardiovascular risk in diabetes, including lipid targets, blood pressure goals, antiplatelet decisions, and heart failure screening
Recognize and triage acute emergencies (diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state, severe hypoglycemia) and state initial management priorities
Identify special populations requiring modified management: older adults, pregnancy, hospitalized patients, and those with advanced chronic kidney disease
Your checkpoint
A complication screening and cardiometabolic risk-reduction checklist covering all recommended annual assessments, tested against two written patient vignettes
Clinical assessment and diagnosis & Pharmacologic therapy and medication management & Diabetes technology and glycemic monitoring
Complete timed practice question sets weighted toward the heaviest domains and log every missed item with the underlying knowledge gap rather than the topic label
Re-teach each missed concept aloud or in writing without notes, then confirm accuracy against a primary source
Reconcile conflicting guideline recommendations across organizations and articulate a defensible clinical position for each conflict
Refine your personal reference sheets down to the highest-yield facts you repeatedly miss
Your checkpoint
A categorized error log of at least 40 missed practice items, each with a corrected one-sentence takeaway and a re-test score
Diabetes self-management education and support & Nutrition, physical activity, and weight management & Complications, comorbidities, and cardiometabolic risk reduction
Review the weakest areas identified in your error log and re-test each until you reach consistent accuracy
Rehearse case-based application of education, nutrition, and complication management in integrated scenarios rather than isolated facts
Simulate full-length timed exam conditions at least twice and analyze pacing, fatigue, and flagging strategy
Consolidate a final one-page summary of high-risk decision points to review in the days before the exam
Your checkpoint
Two completed timed full-length practice exams with score trends, a pacing analysis, and a final one-page high-yield summary sheet
Milestones
Week 2: Can state diagnostic criteria for all diabetes types and select initial pharmacotherapy for type 2 diabetes with comorbid cardiovascular, kidney, or heart failure disease without consulting notes
Week 4: Can produce a complete individualized education, nutrition, and weight-management plan for an unseen patient profile in under 30 minutes with correct insulin calculations
Week 6: Can interpret a full continuous glucose monitoring report and list all annual complication screenings and cardiometabolic risk targets from memory
Week 7: Practice-question accuracy in the three heaviest domains is at or above 70 percent and every logged error has a written corrected takeaway
Week 8: Two timed full-length practice exams completed with stable or improving scores and no domain below 65 percent accuracy