BCSP ASP study materials
BCSP ASP study resources

The Amputated Fingertip and the Floor Drain

BCSP ASP · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Amputated Fingertip and the Floor Drain

At a 210-employee die-casting plant, a temporary worker supplied by a staffing agency caught her hand in a trim press. The plant first-aid log records a dressing change and return to work. A clinic note says the tip of her index finger was amputated and she was referred to a hand surgeon. The host supervisor directs her work daily, but the staffing agency issues her paycheck. She received a 15-minute orientation from the agency and no site-specific training from the host. That afternoon, 300 lb of a chlorinated solvent leaked from a drum; about half soaked into the concrete and entered a floor drain. The plant manager asks whether anything must be reported, saying the finger was just first aid and the solvent was mostly absorbed.

1. What are the reporting and recordkeeping obligations for the injury, and what is wrong with the plant's handling so far?

Read the worked answer

Reporting An amputation must be reported to OSHA within 24 hours, regardless of how the plant characterizes it; fatalities are reported within 8 hours, and in-patient hospitalization or loss of an eye within 24 hours. The report should not wait for the plant's own determination of recordability, and state-plan jurisdictions may add requirements.

Recordkeeping The case belongs on the OSHA 300 log: an amputation is recordable, and treatment beyond first aid is documented by the referral to a hand surgeon. Days away or restricted duty are entered if the physician assigns them. The annual summary is certified and posted from February 1 through April 30. A privacy case entry may be appropriate, but it does not remove the case from the log.

What is wrong

  • The first-aid log entry conflicts with the clinic note, and the plant sided with its own paperwork.
  • The decision was made by production rather than by a competent person using the treating physician's information.
  • Characterizing a fingertip amputation as first aid is not a defensible judgement; the underlying recordkeeping and reporting decision needs to be corrected and the process fixed.

2. What is the host employer's exposure regarding the temporary worker, and what should change?

Read the worked answer

Recordkeeping and duty The host supervises her day to day, so the case is recorded on the host's log; the staffing agency records it if it also supervises. Payroll does not decide the duty.

Liability The host is a controlling employer for the equipment and the work area, and both host and staffing agency can be cited. The absence of site-specific training on a trim press is a serious gap: machine guarding, energy control, and hazard communication obligations attach to the host's equipment and procedures.

What should change

  • A written staffing agreement allocating safety responsibilities, with the understanding that contract language does not transfer the statutory duty.
  • Site-specific orientation before task assignment, including hands-on training on the press and verification of competence.
  • Verification that the agency's general orientation is not treated as site training.
  • Inclusion of temporary workers in injury review, near-miss reporting, and the host's hazard assessments; temporary status should not correlate with higher risk.

3. What must be determined about the solvent release, and who might have to be notified?

Read the worked answer

Establish the facts first Identify the solvent from the safety data sheet, the quantity released within a 24-hour period, whether any reached the drain, soil, or surface water, and whether workers were exposed. Roughly 150 lb entered a drain; absorption into concrete does not make it disappear.

Regulatory triggers to evaluate

  • If the substance has a reportable quantity under the federal release-reporting program and the release exceeds it, immediate notification to the National Response Center is required, along with state and local emergency planning committee notification under the community right-to-know provisions.
  • A discharge to a drain may implicate the Clean Water Act and the local publicly owned treatment works; the permit or pretreatment limits may prohibit it outright.
  • Absorbent and contaminated concrete debris should be evaluated as hazardous waste if it exhibits a characteristic such as toxicity or ignitability; document the waste determination.

Actions Stop and contain the release, ventilate and protect workers from the chlorinated solvent exposure, block the drain, and preserve the drum and SDS. Do not accept mostly absorbed as the analysis; the notification decision rests on quantity and pathway, and the documentation should show how both were determined.