BCS Written Philosophy key terms
BCS Written Philosophy · Get comfortable with the vocabulary.
- Eudaimonia
- Related: Virtue Ethics, Teleology
Aristotle's term for human flourishing or living well, the final goal of action sought for its own sake rather than as a means to something else.
- Virtue Ethics
- Related: Eudaimonia, Practical Wisdom
An approach holding that right action flows from stable good character traits, such as courage and justice, rather than from rules or consequences alone.
- Practical Wisdom
- Related: Virtue Ethics, Eudaimonia
The capacity to perceive what a concrete situation calls for and to deliberate well about action, described by Aristotle as phronesis and acquired through experience.
- Teleology
- Related: Eudaimonia, Four Causes
Explanation of something by reference to the purpose or end it serves; in classical thought, the claim that natural things have inherent goals toward which they tend.
- Four Causes
- Related: Teleology, Hylomorphism
Aristotle's scheme explaining a thing through its material, its form, the source of its coming to be, and the end it serves.
- Hylomorphism
- Related: Four Causes, Substance
The doctrine that every concrete thing is a compound of matter and form, with form making the thing the kind of thing it is.
- Forms (Platonic)
- Related: Participation, Allegory of the Cave
Separate, non-physical paradigms that sensible things imitate or participate in; on Plato's account they are the proper objects of knowledge rather than opinion.
- Participation
- Related: Forms (Platonic), Substance
The relation by which a sensible particular depends on and derives its character from a Form, without being identical with it.
- Allegory of the Cave
- Related: Forms (Platonic), Episteme
Plato's image of prisoners mistaking shadows for reality, illustrating the ascent from sensory illusion through belief to knowledge of the Forms.
- Episteme
- Related: Allegory of the Cave, Justified True Belief
Knowledge in the strict sense: a justified grasp of necessary truths, distinguished from mere true belief and from opinion about changeable things.
- Substance
- Related: Hylomorphism, Categories
That which exists in its own right and underlies properties; in Aristotelian thought the primary case is the individual composite of matter and form.
- Categories
- Related: Substance, Predication
The most general classifications of what can be said of beings, such as substance, quality, quantity, and relation, used to map ontological structure.
- Predication
- Related: Categories, Syllogism
The act of attributing a property or kind to a subject, as when a general term is said of an individual thing.
- Syllogism
- Related: Validity, Predication
A deductive argument in which two premises sharing a middle term jointly entail a conclusion connecting the remaining terms.
- Validity
- Related: Syllogism, Soundness
The property of an argument whose conclusion cannot be false while all its premises are true, owing to the argument's form.
- Soundness
- Related: Validity, Modus Ponens
The combination of validity with actually true premises, so that a sound argument guarantees a true conclusion.
- Modus Ponens
- Related: Soundness, Fallacy
The inference pattern that from a conditional and the affirmation of its antecedent one may conclude the consequent.
- Fallacy
- Related: Modus Ponens, Validity
A recurring pattern of reasoning that appears persuasive but fails to support its conclusion, whether through faulty form or irrelevant content.
- Ockham's Razor
- Related: Nominalism, Substance
The methodological principle that entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity, favouring simpler explanations when competing accounts fit the evidence equally.
- Nominalism
- Related: Ockham's Razor, Universals
The view that only particular things exist and that general terms such as species or properties are names or concepts rather than independently real entities.
- Universals
- Related: Nominalism, Participation
Properties or kinds that can be shared by many particulars at once; the dispute concerns whether such items exist independently of the things instantiating them.
- Ontological Argument
- Related: Cosmological Argument, Necessity
An argument inferring God's existence from the concept of a greatest conceivable being, contending that a being lacking existence would be less than greatest.
- Cosmological Argument
- Related: Ontological Argument, Necessity
A family of arguments inferring a first cause or necessary ground from the existence of contingent, caused, or changing things.
- Necessity
- Related: Ontological Argument, A Priori
The status of a proposition that could not be false, or of a being whose non-existence is impossible, contrasted with what merely happens to be so.
- A Priori
- Related: A Posteriori, Necessity
Knowledge or justification that does not depend on sensory experience for its warrant, as in mathematics or basic logical principles.
- A Posteriori
- Related: A Priori, Empiricism
Knowledge or justification that depends on experience or observation for its warrant, as in empirical science and everyday perception.
- Empiricism
- Related: A Posteriori, Rationalism
The doctrine that all substantive knowledge or ideas derive ultimately from sensory experience, denying that reason alone can supply content about the world.
- Rationalism
- Related: A Priori, Empiricism
The doctrine that reason, independent of sense experience, can furnish substantive knowledge of reality, including necessary truths about the world.
- Cogito
- Related: Method of Doubt, Rationalism
Descartes' formulation that the very act of doubting or thinking establishes the thinker's existence as an indubitable starting point for knowledge.
- Method of Doubt
- Related: Cogito, Scepticism
Descartes' procedure of withholding assent from anything that can be doubted, in order to find a foundation immune to sceptical challenge.
- Scepticism
- Related: Method of Doubt, Justified True Belief
The position that knowledge, or justified belief, about some or all domains is unattainable or must be suspended.
- Justified True Belief
- Related: Episteme, Scepticism
The traditional analysis of knowledge as belief that is true and supported by adequate justification, famously challenged by Gettier-style counterexamples.
- Categorical Imperative
- Related: Autonomy, Deontology
Kant's supreme moral principle, requiring that one act only on maxims that could be willed as universal law and never treat humanity merely as a means.
- Deontology
- Related: Categorical Imperative, Consequentialism
An ethics holding that certain acts are right or wrong in themselves, independently of their consequences, typically grounded in duties or rules.
- Consequentialism
- Related: Deontology, Utility
A family of theories assessing acts solely by the value of their outcomes, with utilitarianism as the best-known member.
- Utility
- Related: Consequentialism, Categorical Imperative
The measure of benefit or welfare used in utilitarian calculation, often understood as happiness or preference satisfaction summed across affected parties.
- Autonomy
- Related: Categorical Imperative, Social Contract
The capacity of an agent to govern itself by principles it endorses, central to Kantian ethics and to political theories of self-rule.
- Social Contract
- Related: Autonomy, State of Nature
The idea that political authority derives from an agreement, actual or hypothetical, among those subject to it.
- State of Nature
- Related: Social Contract, Autonomy
A thought-experiment describing human life apart from political institutions, used to justify or critique forms of government.
- Veil of Ignorance
- Related: Social Contract, Justice as Fairness
A device for choosing principles of justice while ignorant of one's own talents, position, and conception of the good, so that choice is impartial.
- Justice as Fairness
- Related: Veil of Ignorance, Social Contract
Rawls' theory that principles of justice are those rational parties would agree to behind a veil of ignorance, combining equal basic liberties with fair distribution.
- Qualia
- Related: Consciousness, Physicalism
The subjective, felt character of experience, such as the distinctive way pain or redness appears to the one undergoing it.
- Physicalism
- Related: Qualia, Dualism
The view that everything that exists is physical, or that mental states are identical with or realised by physical states.
- Dualism
- Related: Physicalism, Qualia
The view that mind and body are distinct kinds of thing or property, so that mental phenomena are not exhausted by the physical.
- Consciousness
- Related: Qualia, Intentionality
The state of being aware of something or of oneself, encompassing phenomenal experience and the capacity for thought about one's own states.
- Intentionality
- Related: Consciousness, Sense and Reference
The directedness of mental states toward objects or contents, as when a belief is always a belief about something.
- Sense and Reference
- Related: Intentionality, Speech Act
Frege's distinction between the mode of presentation of an expression and the object it designates, explaining how identity statements can be informative.
- Speech Act
- Related: Sense and Reference, Meaning
An utterance understood as an action, such as promising, warning, or asserting, whose performance depends on conventions and appropriate circumstances.
- Meaning
- Related: Speech Act, Sense and Reference
What an expression or utterance conveys; theories differ over whether this is an object, a concept, a use, or a pattern of truth conditions.
- Falsifiability
- Related: Paradigm, Induction
The property of a hypothesis being open to refutation by possible observation, proposed as a demarcation criterion between science and non-science.
- Paradigm
- Related: Falsifiability, Induction
In Kuhn's account, the shared assumptions, methods, and exemplary problems that define a scientific community during a period of normal research.
- Induction
- Related: Falsifiability, Validity
Inference from observed cases to a general conclusion or to predictions about unobserved cases, whose justification remains philosophically contested.
- Paradox
- Related: Fallacy, Validity
A set of apparently acceptable premises or principles that yields an unacceptable or contradictory conclusion, prompting revision of at least one element.