BRTA Non-Professional Driving Licence Test study materials
BRTA Non-Professional Driving Licence Test study resources

The Medicine Cabinet and the Morning Shift

BRTA Non-Professional Driving Licence Test · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Medicine Cabinet and the Morning Shift

A driver must leave at 05:30 for a three-hour drive to a depot. The evening before, he felt a cold coming on and took a combination cold remedy containing an antihistamine, plus a codeine-based painkiller for a backache, and had two bottles of beer with dinner around 20:00. He slept badly, waking at 04:00, and feels groggy and slightly dizzy standing up. He has driven this route many times and considers himself a confident, experienced driver. He plans to drink a strong coffee and 'push through' because the delivery slot cannot be missed.

1. Identify the factors affecting this driver's fitness and assess whether he should drive at 05:30.

Read the worked answer

Four factors stack up here. The antihistamine in the cold remedy is commonly sedating and impairs alertness and reaction time. Codeine is an opioid that can cause drowsiness and dizziness, and combined with an antihistamine the sedative effect is greater than either alone. Alcohol from two beers at 20:00 may be largely metabolised by 05:30, but it disrupts sleep quality and adds to next-morning grogginess; the safe assumption is that any residual alcohol plus sedating medicine is a bad combination. Finally, only about four to five hours of broken sleep creates genuine fatigue, and the dizziness on standing suggests he is not fit to be in control of a vehicle.

Confidence and familiarity are not protective - they increase the risk of underestimating impairment. On these facts he should not drive at 05:30. Coffee does not reverse sedation or fatigue; it masks it briefly.

2. What should he do instead, and what should he check before driving later that day?

Read the worked answer

He should not start the journey. Options in order of preference: arrange cover or a later delivery slot, ask another driver to take the run, or use public transport or a taxi for the first leg. He should tell his employer he is unfit to drive rather than inventing a mechanical excuse, because fitness-to-drive is a legitimate reason to decline a journey.

Before driving later he should check three things. First, the medicine labels and any pharmacist advice on how long after the last dose it is safe to drive; sedative effects can persist well beyond the night. Second, whether he still feels dizzy, drowsy or unsteady - if so, he does not drive. Third, that he has had real sleep, not just caffeine. If the cold persists and he needs symptom relief, he should ask the pharmacist for a non-sedating alternative and avoid codeine before driving.

3. How would you answer his argument that he has driven this route many times and is a confident driver?

Read the worked answer

Familiarity affects skill, not impairment. The risks here are physiological - sedation, fatigue and poor sleep - and experience does not shorten reaction time when a driver is sedated or micro-sleeping. In fact, a familiar route is more dangerous in this state, because monotony and low early-morning traffic encourage lapses of attention and the driver stops actively scanning for hazards.

Confidence is also a poor self-assessment tool: impaired drivers routinely rate their performance as better than it is, which is part of why the impairment is dangerous. The correct standard is not 'can I get there?' but 'could I stop in time if a child stepped out at 06:00?' On these facts the honest answer is no, so the journey should be reassigned or delayed regardless of his experience.