I85PREP
⌘ K
Kamil Examination study materials
Kamil Examination study resources

Kamil Examination practice questions

One question at a time. Build your Kamil Examination understanding.

First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Professional Ethics and Conduct

A licensed professional discovers that a colleague has been falsifying client records. According to the professional code of conduct, what is the primary obligation of the discovering professional?

  1. Discuss the matter only with the colleague's clients
  2. Confront the colleague privately and demand an immediate resignation
  3. Report the matter through the appropriate supervisory or regulatory channel Correct answer.
  4. Ignore the issue to preserve professional collegiality

Explanation

Professional codes generally require members to report known or suspected misconduct to the appropriate authority rather than handling it informally. Reporting protects clients, the public, and the integrity of the profession. Private confrontation or silence does not satisfy this duty.

Question 2Professional Ethics and Conduct

Which principle requires a professional to place the interests of clients and the public ahead of personal financial gain?

  1. Fiduciary duty Correct answer.
  2. Peer review
  3. Continuing education
  4. Confidentiality

Explanation

Fiduciary duty obliges a professional to act in the client's best interest and to subordinate personal advantage to that interest. It is the core principle governing conflicts between self-interest and client welfare. Confidentiality and education serve other distinct purposes.

Question 3Professional Ethics and Conduct

A professional is asked to accept a gift from a client in exchange for expedited service that would disadvantage other clients. What is the most appropriate response?

  1. Accept the gift and provide the service quietly
  2. Decline the gift and the preferential arrangement Correct answer.
  3. Accept the gift but disclose it later in an annual report
  4. Decline the gift but still provide the expedited service

Explanation

Accepting gifts tied to preferential treatment creates a conflict of interest and undermines fair treatment of all clients. The professional should decline both the gift and the improper arrangement. Later disclosure does not cure the underlying conflict.

Question 4Professional Ethics and Conduct

What does the principle of informed consent require before a professional provides services to a client?

  1. Approval from the professional's employer only
  2. A written waiver of all future claims
  3. The client's voluntary agreement after understanding relevant information Correct answer.
  4. A verbal promise that the client will pay all fees

Explanation

Informed consent requires that the client receive adequate information about the service, risks, and alternatives, and then agree voluntarily. It is grounded in respect for client autonomy. Payment promises or employer approval are not substitutes.

Question 5Professional Ethics and Conduct

A professional's personal religious views conflict with a client's lawful request. What does ethical conduct generally require?

  1. Persuade the client to change the request
  2. Provide the service or refer the client appropriately without discrimination Correct answer.
  3. Refuse service and explain the personal objection
  4. Provide a lower standard of service

Explanation

Professionals must avoid unlawful discrimination and should either provide lawful services or make an appropriate referral. Personal beliefs do not justify denying service or lowering its quality. Persuasion attempts are inappropriate.

Question 6Professional Ethics and Conduct

Which of the following best describes the purpose of a professional code of ethics?

  1. To guarantee higher salaries for members
  2. To set standards of conduct that protect the public and the profession Correct answer.
  3. To limit competition among practitioners
  4. To replace all legal obligations

Explanation

Codes of ethics articulate expected standards of behavior that safeguard the public and maintain trust in the profession. They complement, rather than replace, legal duties. They are not designed to secure pay or restrict competition.

Question 7Professional Ethics and Conduct

A professional completes a project but later realizes a minor error that does not affect safety or material outcomes. What is the ethically appropriate action?

  1. Wait to see whether the client notices
  2. Disclose the error to the client and correct it Correct answer.
  3. Blame a junior colleague for the mistake
  4. Conceal the error to avoid reputational harm

Explanation

Honesty and accountability require professionals to disclose errors and take reasonable steps to correct them, even when consequences are minor. Concealment erodes trust and can compound harm. Shifting blame is itself unethical.

Question 8Professional Ethics and Conduct

What is the primary purpose of maintaining client confidentiality?

  1. To avoid all legal reporting duties
  2. To increase the professional's bargaining power
  3. To prevent clients from seeking second opinions
  4. To protect client privacy and encourage open disclosure Correct answer.

Explanation

Confidentiality protects client privacy and fosters the trust needed for clients to share information openly. It is a cornerstone of professional relationships. It does not override lawful reporting obligations.

Question 9Professional Ethics and Conduct

A professional is offered a consulting role with a company that is a direct competitor of a current client. Which step best addresses the potential conflict of interest?

  1. Resign from all professional associations
  2. Disclose the potential conflict and obtain informed consent or decline Correct answer.
  3. Accept the role and keep it secret from the current client
  4. Accept the role only if the fee is higher

Explanation

Conflicts of interest should be identified and disclosed so affected parties can decide whether to consent. Where consent cannot be obtained, the professional should decline. Secrecy or fee-based reasoning does not resolve the conflict.

Question 10Professional Ethics and Conduct

A client asks a professional to keep a serious, imminent threat of harm secret. How should the professional respond ethically?

  1. Honor confidentiality absolutely in all cases
  2. Ignore the threat until harm occurs
  3. Disclose only what is necessary to prevent harm, consistent with law Correct answer.
  4. Publish the threat widely on social media

Explanation

Confidentiality is limited when disclosure is necessary to prevent serious harm, and professionals should reveal only the minimum needed. This balancing respects both privacy and the duty to protect others. Absolute secrecy or public broadcasting is inappropriate.

Question 11Professional Ethics and Conduct

A supervisor asks a professional to sign off on work the professional did not perform or verify. What is the appropriate course of action?

  1. Refuse to sign and explain the need for proper verification Correct answer.
  2. Sign off but note concerns privately
  3. Sign off to maintain workplace harmony
  4. Ask a colleague to sign instead

Explanation

Signing off on unverified work misrepresents competence and creates risk for clients and the public. The professional should refuse and ensure proper verification occurs. Delegating the false attestation to another does not cure the problem.

Question 12Professional Ethics and Conduct

Which action best demonstrates maintaining professional competence?

  1. Taking on every task regardless of expertise
  2. Participating in continuing education and reflective practice Correct answer.
  3. Relying solely on knowledge gained during initial training
  4. Avoiding feedback from peers

Explanation

Competence is maintained through ongoing learning, self-assessment, and responsiveness to feedback. Professionals must recognize the limits of their expertise. Stagnation or overreach risks client harm.

Question 13Professional Ethics and Conduct

A professional receives a subpoena for client records in a legal proceeding. What is the most appropriate first step?

  1. Verify the legal validity and seek guidance before disclosing Correct answer.
  2. Release all records without review
  3. Post the request publicly for advice
  4. Immediately destroy the records

Explanation

Before disclosing confidential records, a professional should confirm the legal validity of the request and obtain appropriate legal or ethical guidance. This balances legal obligations with confidentiality. Destruction or unchecked release is improper.

Question 14Professional Ethics and Conduct

A professional is asked to provide services outside their area of training. What is the ethical approach?

  1. Proceed without informing the client
  2. Decline or refer unless competent, or obtain proper supervision Correct answer.
  3. Proceed and learn on the job at the client's expense
  4. Proceed if the client insists

Explanation

Professionals should practice only within their competence and refer or seek supervision when a matter exceeds their expertise. Proceeding without competence exposes clients to risk. Client insistence does not justify inadequate qualifications.

Question 15Professional Ethics and Conduct

What is the ethical significance of documenting professional decisions and their rationale?

  1. It creates a record supporting accountability and continuity of care Correct answer.
  2. It allows professionals to avoid responsibility
  3. It is only needed when a dispute arises
  4. It replaces the need for informed consent

Explanation

Documentation supports accountability, continuity, and transparency in professional practice. It demonstrates the reasoning behind decisions and aids review. It does not substitute for consent or shield responsibility.

Question 16Professional Ethics and Conduct

A professional learns that a colleague is practicing while impaired by substance use, endangering clients. What is the most appropriate action?

  1. Say nothing to avoid conflict
  2. Warn clients individually without reporting
  3. Quietly take over the colleague's clients
  4. Report through appropriate channels to protect clients Correct answer.

Explanation

Impaired practice poses serious risk, and professionals have a duty to report through proper channels to protect clients and support intervention. Silence or informal workarounds leave the risk unaddressed. Individual warnings are inadequate.

Question 17Professional Ethics and Conduct

Which statement best reflects the ethical duty regarding cultural competence?

  1. Recognize cultural differences and adapt practice respectfully Correct answer.
  2. Avoid serving clients from unfamiliar cultures
  3. Treat every client identically regardless of background
  4. Require clients to adopt the professional's values

Explanation

Cultural competence involves recognizing how culture affects values, communication, and needs, and adapting practice respectfully. Treating everyone identically can ignore relevant differences. Refusing service or imposing values is discriminatory.

Question 18Professional Ethics and Conduct

A professional is asked to endorse a product in exchange for payment without disclosing the arrangement. What is the ethical concern?

  1. The concern is only about tax reporting
  2. Undisclosed payment creates deception and a conflict of interest Correct answer.
  3. Endorsements are always prohibited
  4. There is no concern if the product works

Explanation

Undisclosed paid endorsements mislead audiences and create an undisclosed conflict of interest. Transparency about financial arrangements is required so recipients can judge credibility. The product's effectiveness does not cure the deception.

Question 19Professional Ethics and Conduct

What does the principle of professional integrity most directly require when a professional makes a commitment to a client?

  1. Treating the commitment as optional guidance
  2. Honoring the commitment or renegotiating transparently Correct answer.
  3. Renegotiating only if a better offer arises
  4. Delegating the commitment without notice

Explanation

Integrity requires professionals to keep commitments or, when circumstances change, renegotiate openly and transparently. Unilateral abandonment or silent delegation betrays client trust. Commitments are binding obligations, not mere suggestions.

Question 20Professional Ethics and Conduct

A professional discovers that a client intends to use the professional's services to defraud a third party. What is the appropriate response?

  1. Decline to participate and consider reporting obligations Correct answer.
  2. Advise the client on how to avoid detection
  3. Proceed because the client is paying
  4. Proceed but distance oneself from the outcome

Explanation

Professionals must not facilitate fraud and should decline involvement, while considering any legal or ethical reporting duties. Payment does not justify participation. Advising on concealment compounds wrongdoing.

Question 21Professional Ethics and Conduct

A professional serves on a regulatory board while also holding a financial stake in a company the board regulates. What is the most appropriate action?

  1. Disclose the stake and recuse from related decisions Correct answer.
  2. Remain on the board and vote on matters involving the company
  3. Delegate the vote to a business partner
  4. Sell the stake secretly after voting

Explanation

A financial stake in a regulated entity creates a clear conflict of interest that requires disclosure and recusal from related decisions. Secret divestment after voting does not cure the tainted process. Delegating to a partner with shared interests is equally improper.

Question 22Professional Ethics and Conduct

A professional is pressured by an employer to suppress findings that reveal a public safety risk. Which course best reflects ethical priorities?

  1. Delay the findings indefinitely
  2. Publish the findings anonymously without any verification
  3. Prioritize public safety and use appropriate reporting channels Correct answer.
  4. Comply because the employer controls the employment relationship

Explanation

The duty to protect the public generally outweighs employer pressure to conceal safety risks, and professionals should escalate through proper channels. Compliance with concealment can cause serious harm. Anonymous unverified publication is neither reliable nor accountable.

Question 23Professional Ethics and Conduct

A professional realizes that a research study they published contains a statistical error that could mislead practitioners. What is the most appropriate response?

  1. Wait for others to discover the error
  2. Defend the findings regardless of the error
  3. Issue a correction and inform affected parties Correct answer.
  4. Quietly delete the publication

Explanation

Scientific integrity requires prompt correction of errors that could mislead, along with notification of those who may rely on the work. Silence or deletion conceals the problem. Defending known errors undermines trust and accuracy.

Question 24Professional Ethics and Conduct

A professional must decide between two clients whose interests directly conflict in the same matter. What is the ethically sound approach?

  1. Represent both and keep the conflict secret
  2. Decline joint representation or obtain proper consent where permitted Correct answer.
  3. Represent both without informing either party
  4. Represent both and favor the higher-paying client

Explanation

Directly conflicting interests generally make joint representation improper unless all parties give informed consent and representation remains fair. Favoring one client or keeping the conflict secret breaches loyalty and transparency.

Question 25Professional Ethics and Conduct

A professional is asked to provide an expert opinion in a matter where they previously advised the opposing party. What is the primary ethical concern?

  1. The length of the report
  2. The professional's membership in associations
  3. A conflict arising from prior involvement with the opposing party Correct answer.
  4. The professional's fee level

Explanation

Prior involvement with an opposing party can create divided loyalties and access to confidential information, undermining impartiality. The professional should assess and disclose this conflict, and may need to decline. Fee levels and report length are not the central ethical issue.

Question 26Professional Ethics and Conduct

A professional is asked to serve as a volunteer officer of a community nonprofit whose mission aligns with their practice area. Before accepting, what is the most appropriate ethical consideration?

  1. Whether the nonprofit can cover travel expenses and other out-of-pocket costs
  2. Whether the role will raise the professional's public profile in their field
  3. Whether accepting the role creates a conflict of interest or the appearance of one with current clients and duties Correct answer.
  4. Whether the time commitment will reduce the professional's billable hours

Explanation

Professionals should assess new roles for conflicts of interest, including appearance-based conflicts, before accepting them. Volunteer or civic positions can create divided loyalty or influence when the organization interacts with clients, employers, or regulators. Disclosing and managing any conflict, or declining when it cannot be managed, protects objectivity and public trust.

Question 27Professional Ethics and Conduct

A professional is asked to review the work of a former student who is now a junior colleague at the same firm. Which approach best manages the ethical risk in this situation?

  1. Declare the prior relationship and ensure the review is objective and independently verifiable Correct answer.
  2. Approve the work without comment to avoid embarrassing the junior colleague
  3. Recommend the junior colleague for promotion to reinforce the professional relationship
  4. Delegate the review to a colleague while keeping the prior relationship confidential

Explanation

Prior personal or supervisory relationships can impair objectivity, so professionals should disclose them and structure the work so that judgments are objective and verifiable. Transparency allows the organization to apply safeguards such as independent review or documentation. Concealment of the relationship, rather than the relationship itself, is the primary ethical failure.

Question 28Professional Ethics and Conduct

A professional is invited to join the board of a charity that receives funding from a client. Which arrangement most clearly reflects appropriate ethical practice?

  1. Decline the seat and avoid any contact with the charity
  2. Accept the seat but recuse from decisions involving the client and disclose the relationship Correct answer.
  3. Accept the seat and keep the client relationship private from the board
  4. Accept the seat and vote on all funding decisions affecting the client

Explanation

When a professional's outside role overlaps with a client relationship, disclosure combined with recusal from affected decisions is the standard safeguard. Recusal removes the decision from the zone of divided loyalty while disclosure lets others evaluate the remaining risk. This preserves both the professional's service to the community and the integrity of the client relationship.

Question 29Professional Ethics and Conduct

A professional's employer proposes a marketing claim that is technically accurate but likely to mislead the public about the reliability of a service. What is the most appropriate response?

  1. Refuse to endorse the claim and raise the concern through appropriate channels Correct answer.
  2. Approve the claim but ask that a disclaimer be added later if complaints arise
  3. Approve the claim because it is technically accurate and within the law
  4. Forward the claim to a competitor to test whether it is acceptable

Explanation

Honesty obligations extend beyond literal accuracy to the avoidance of misleading impressions, especially where the public may rely on claims. The professional should decline to endorse the material and escalate the concern internally or to the relevant authority. Passive approval or waiting for complaints fails to prevent foreseeable harm.

Question 30Professional Ethics and Conduct

A professional serves on a committee drafting standards that will directly govern a service line the professional's own firm sells. The firm stands to gain substantially if the standard is written broadly. Which course best satisfies ethical obligations?

  1. Withdraw from the committee entirely without informing anyone of the reason
  2. Draft the standard broadly but abstain from the final vote as a courtesy
  3. Disclose the interest and recuse from drafting and voting on provisions affecting the firm's service line Correct answer.
  4. Draft the standard broadly and rely on the firm's disclosure of its commercial interest

Explanation

Where a professional's commercial interest could shape a standard that governs competitors and the public, disclosure alone is insufficient; recusal from the affected provisions is required. Recusal protects the integrity of the standard-setting process and preserves public confidence. Participation limited to unrelated provisions can still allow the professional to contribute expertise.

Question 31Core Knowledge and Principles

Which term describes the principle that a person cannot be tried twice for the same offence after a final verdict?

  1. Stare decisis
  2. Habeas corpus
  3. Due process
  4. Double jeopardy Correct answer.

Explanation

Double jeopardy protects an accused person from being prosecuted again for the same conduct once a valid final judgment has been reached. The other doctrines address fair procedure, unlawful detention review, or precedent, not repeated prosecution.

Question 32Core Knowledge and Principles

A court is asked to interpret a statute whose wording is clear but whose literal result seems absurd. Which approach best reflects the purposive method?

  1. Apply the literal words regardless of consequence
  2. Reject the statute as unenforceable
  3. Consider the statute's objective and the mischief it addresses Correct answer.
  4. Defer entirely to the drafting history of the bill

Explanation

Purposive interpretation asks what problem the legislature intended to solve and reads the text in light of that objective. It does not ignore the words, but it avoids results that defeat the statute's evident purpose.

Question 33Core Knowledge and Principles

In a jurisdiction following the presumption of innocence, who bears the burden of proving guilt in a criminal trial?

  1. The prosecutor Correct answer.
  2. The accused
  3. The judge
  4. The complainant

Explanation

The presumption of innocence places the burden of proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt on the prosecution. The accused is not required to prove innocence, and the judge or complainant does not carry that burden.

Question 34Core Knowledge and Principles

A written constitution divides power between a central government and regional governments, each supreme in its own sphere. This arrangement is best described as:

  1. Confederal
  2. Theocratic
  3. Federal Correct answer.
  4. Unitary

Explanation

Federalism distributes authority between a central government and constituent units, each with constitutionally guaranteed powers. A unitary system concentrates power centrally, while a confederation is a looser union of states.

Question 35Core Knowledge and Principles

Which concept requires that like cases be treated alike and that distinctions rest on relevant differences?

  1. Rule of law
  2. Equality before the law Correct answer.
  3. Separation of powers
  4. Judicial independence

Explanation

Equality before the law demands consistent treatment of similarly situated persons and justification for any differentiation. Separation of powers, judicial independence, and rule of law are related but distinct constitutional principles.

Question 36Core Knowledge and Principles

A statute states that a minister 'may' issue regulations. A court holds the minister is not obliged to act. Which canon supports this reading?

  1. The word 'may' is mandatory
  2. The word 'may' is permissive Correct answer.
  3. Later statutes repeal earlier ones
  4. Penal statutes are construed strictly

Explanation

Drafting convention treats 'may' as conferring discretion and 'shall' as imposing a duty. Courts therefore read 'may' as permissive unless context clearly indicates otherwise.

Question 37Core Knowledge and Principles

Which doctrine prevents a government official from acting beyond the powers granted by law?

  1. Actus reus
  2. Mens rea
  3. Res judicata
  4. Ultra vires Correct answer.

Explanation

Ultra vires means 'beyond the powers' and is used to invalidate acts that exceed statutory or constitutional authority. Res judicata concerns finality of litigation, while mens rea and actus reus are elements of criminal liability.

Question 38Core Knowledge and Principles

In criminal law, the mental element that requires awareness that a circumstance exists or that a result is practically certain is:

  1. Strict liability
  2. Recklessness
  3. Negligence
  4. Knowledge Correct answer.

Explanation

Knowledge denotes actual awareness of a circumstance or practical certainty of a result. Recklessness involves conscious disregard of a substantial risk, negligence involves a failure to perceive risk, and strict liability dispenses with mental elements.

Question 39Core Knowledge and Principles

A person intentionally enters a building at night to steal. Which element distinguishes burglary from simple theft in most common-law definitions?

  1. The use of force against a person
  2. The unlawful entry into a building Correct answer.
  3. The value of the property taken
  4. The return of the property

Explanation

Burglary is defined by unlawful entry into a building with intent to commit an offence, not by the value of what is taken. Force against a person distinguishes robbery, and return of property does not alter the offence.

Question 40Core Knowledge and Principles

Which source of law is created by judges deciding cases and binding later courts within the same hierarchy?

  1. Regulation
  2. Statute
  3. Treaty
  4. Common law Correct answer.

Explanation

Common law is judge-made law developed through decided cases, where reasoning binds lower courts in the same hierarchy. Statutes and regulations are enacted by legislatures or agencies, and treaties bind states at international law.

Question 41Core Knowledge and Principles

A lower court must follow a rule announced by a higher appellate court in the same jurisdiction. This obligation rests on:

  1. Binding precedent Correct answer.
  2. Obiter dicta
  3. Persuasive precedent
  4. Ratio decidendi

Explanation

Binding precedent obliges lower courts in the same hierarchy to follow rules laid down by superior courts. Persuasive precedent lacks that authority, while obiter dicta and ratio decidendi describe parts of a judgment.

Question 42Core Knowledge and Principles

Which principle holds that a later statute on the same subject impliedly repeals an earlier one to the extent of inconsistency?

  1. Lex specialis
  2. Nulla poena sine lege
  3. Lex posterior derogat priori Correct answer.
  4. Ignorantia juris non excusat

Explanation

Lex posterior derogat priori means the later law prevails over the earlier one when they conflict. Lex specialis resolves conflicts by preferring the more specific provision, and the other maxims concern legality and ignorance of law.

Question 43Core Knowledge and Principles

A defendant argues that evidence was obtained through an unlawful search. Which constitutional guarantee is most directly engaged?

  1. Freedom of religion
  2. Right to a fair trial by jury
  3. Right to privacy against unreasonable search Correct answer.
  4. Freedom of expression

Explanation

Unlawful searches implicate the guarantee against unreasonable search and seizure, which protects reasonable expectations of privacy. Expression, jury trial, and religion are distinct guarantees not directly concerned with search powers.

Question 44Core Knowledge and Principles

A court applies a proportionality test to a limitation on a constitutional right. Which sequence best reflects that analysis?

  1. Ask whether the legislature intended the limitation, then whether it was debated
  2. Ask whether the claimant suffered loss, then whether compensation is available
  3. Ask whether the right exists, then whether the limitation is popular
  4. Ask whether the limitation serves a legitimate aim and is rationally connected, minimally impairing, and proportionate Correct answer.

Explanation

Proportionality examines legitimate objective, rational connection, minimal impairment, and overall balance between benefit and harm. Popularity, legislative intent alone, or compensation do not substitute for that structured inquiry.

Question 45Core Knowledge and Principles

Which body typically reviews the legality of administrative decisions and may quash them?

  1. A criminal trial court
  2. A legislative committee
  3. A coroner's inquest
  4. An administrative court Correct answer.

Explanation

Administrative courts or judicial review divisions examine whether executive decisions comply with law and may quash unlawful acts. Criminal courts try offences, legislative committees oversee policy, and inquests investigate deaths.

Question 46Core Knowledge and Principles

In contract law, which element is required for an agreement to become legally enforceable?

  1. Registration
  2. Consideration Correct answer.
  3. Witnesses
  4. Notarization

Explanation

Enforceable contracts generally require offer, acceptance, consideration, and intention to create legal relations. Notarization, registration, or witnesses may be required for particular transactions but are not general prerequisites.

Question 47Core Knowledge and Principles

A person who commits a wrong against another and is liable to pay damages has committed a:

  1. Breach of treaty
  2. Tort Correct answer.
  3. Felony
  4. Misdemeanour

Explanation

A tort is a civil wrong giving rise to liability, usually in damages, independent of criminal classification. Felony and misdemeanour are categories of crime, and treaty breach concerns international obligations.

Question 48Core Knowledge and Principles

Which standard of proof applies in most civil cases?

  1. Reasonable suspicion
  2. Clear and convincing evidence
  3. Balance of probabilities Correct answer.
  4. Beyond reasonable doubt

Explanation

Civil litigation generally requires the claimant to prove the case on the balance of probabilities, meaning it is more likely than not. Beyond reasonable doubt is the criminal standard, and reasonable suspicion is a threshold for investigation.

Question 49Core Knowledge and Principles

A judge decides a novel case by reasoning from the underlying rationale of earlier decisions rather than their precise facts. This reasoning is:

  1. Deductive from a statute
  2. Appeal to public opinion
  3. Reliance on obiter dicta
  4. Analogical from the ratio decidendi Correct answer.

Explanation

Reasoning by analogy extends the principle underlying earlier decisions, found in their ratio decidendi, to materially similar new facts. It does not depend on statutory deduction, incidental remarks, or popular sentiment.

Question 50Core Knowledge and Principles

Which maxim expresses that no one may be punished except for a breach of a law established beforehand?

  1. Volenti non fit injuria
  2. Res ipsa loquitur
  3. Caveat emptor
  4. Nulla poena sine lege Correct answer.

Explanation

Nulla poena sine lege means no punishment without a pre-existing law, a core element of legality in criminal law. The other maxims concern circumstantial evidence, buyer caution, and consent to risk.