NTRCA College study materials
NTRCA College study resources

A Fact-Check Emergency Before Publication

NTRCA College · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

A Fact-Check Emergency Before Publication

A college teacher is preparing a one-page handout on the Liberation War for a quiz competition to be held in two days. A student volunteer has drafted it and included four claims: (1) the war formally began on 26 March 1971; (2) the Instrument of Surrender was signed on 16 December 1971; (3) Bangladesh became a member of the United Nations in 1974; (4) the provisional government took oath at Mujibnagar on 17 April 1971. The teacher is confident about (2) and (4) but unsure about (1) and (3), and has no internet access. The college library has a single general encyclopedia and a textbook whose edition date is 1998. The quiz master will use the same handout to set questions, so an error would be repeated to all 200 participants.

1. How should the teacher resolve the uncertainty about claims (1) and (3) before the handout is printed?

Read the worked answer

Treat the four claims by confidence level.

High confidence, retain: (2) 16 December 1971 surrender, and (4) 17 April 1971 Mujibnagar oath - the teacher already knows these and the textbook can corroborate them.

Claim (1) needs precision, not deletion. "The war formally began on 26 March 1971" is loose. Operation Searchlight was launched on the night of 25 March, and independence was declared in the early hours of 26 March. The safe formulation is: "Armed resistance began on the night of 25–26 March 1971 following Operation Searchlight." This avoids asserting a single formal start date.

Claim (3) is correct - Bangladesh joined the UN in 1974 - but the teacher cannot verify it from memory alone with confidence. The 1998 textbook predates nothing relevant here and can confirm it; the encyclopedia can serve as a second source. If neither confirms it, mark it "to be verified" and drop it from the quiz rather than risk error.

2. What is the strongest argument against letting the student volunteer's draft go to the quiz master unchecked, and what procedure should replace it?

Read the worked answer

The argument: the handout is not just a teaching aid; it is the source document for the quiz. An error propagates to 200 participants and is then repeated as "knowledge." The cost of one wrong fact is far higher than the cost of a one-day delay.

Procedure:

  1. The teacher personally verifies every factual claim against at least two independent sources - the textbook and the encyclopedia - and initials each line.
  2. Any claim that cannot be verified in two sources is removed, not softened with vague wording.
  3. A second colleague reads the final sheet for dates and names before printing.
  4. The quiz master receives the verified sheet only, with a note of the sources used.

This converts an informal student draft into a checked document and makes the teacher, not the volunteer, accountable for accuracy.