The Composition That Everyone Passed
An English teacher at a rural secondary school set a 150-word composition, 'My Village', for Class 8. She marked 38 scripts and found that 33 contained nearly identical opening sentences and the same three body points, all closely matching a guidebook essay that circulates in the bazaar. Only five students wrote independently, and their scripts had frequent errors in tense and article use. The teacher's marking scheme awards 10 marks for content, 5 for organisation and 5 for language. She is under pressure because the terminal examination will use an unseen topic, and the head teacher has asked why composition marks are high while overall English results are low. She has three weeks before the terminal examination and one double period per week for writing.
1. Explain the gap between the high composition marks and the low overall English results, using the marking scheme.
Read the worked answer
The marking scheme rewards content and organisation heavily (15 of 20 marks) and language lightly (5 of 20). Memorised guidebook essays score well on content and organisation because the content is pre-packaged and the structure is fixed, so students who copied get high marks without producing language. The five independent writers, by contrast, generate their own content and organisation but reveal weak control of tense and articles, and lose marks on language. So the marks measure recognition and reproduction rather than the ability to write. The terminal examination uses an unseen topic, which removes the memorised content advantage and forces students to generate language under time pressure, exactly where the class is weak. The high composition marks therefore overstate competence and predict the low overall result rather than contradicting it.
2. Propose a three-week plan for the double periods that reduces reliance on memorised essays and addresses the language weaknesses.
Read the worked answer
Weeks one and two should break the memorised pattern by changing the task type. Use short, tightly framed writing (60-80 words) on familiar but personal topics that cannot be copied, such as describing a recent market day or a family chore, with a required detail that is specific to the student. Teach a simple planning step: three bullets before writing, then a check for one tense error and one article error. Give brief, focused language mini-lessons on the two most frequent errors found in the five independent scripts, with quick correction exercises. Week three should simulate the unseen condition: a timed 100-word composition on a new topic, marked with the same scheme but with language weighting raised temporarily to 8 marks so students see that accuracy matters. Throughout, collect scripts and compare error counts week by week rather than only awarding grades.
3. The head teacher wants composition marks to 'look honest' before the terminal examination. Advise the teacher on how to adjust marking fairly without demoralising students.
Read the worked answer
The teacher should not simply lower marks retrospectively; that punishes students for a task design that invited copying. Instead, she should explain the change, then re-mark a sample of scripts against a revised scheme that gives more weight to language and to originality of content, and show students anonymised examples of why a copied essay earns fewer content marks under the new criteria. Fairness requires applying the same revised scheme to all future work and giving students practice under it before the terminal examination. She should also record both the original and revised marks for her own records so she can explain the shift to the head teacher with evidence. The message to students is that the standard has changed and they will be taught to meet it, not that their past work was worthless.