Belgian Judicial Traineeship Admission Exam study materials
Belgian Judicial Traineeship Admission Exam study resources

Belgian Judicial Traineeship Admission Exam: Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure

Belgian Judicial Traineeship Admission Exam · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure

Substantive criminal law

Start with the principle of legality: no crime or punishment without a clear legal basis, with strict interpretation and no analogy against the accused. Know the elements of an offence: the legal element, the material element (act, omission where a duty to act exists), and the moral element (intent, or negligence where the statute allows). Study the grounds of justification (self-defence, necessity, lawful authority) and excuse (error, minority, mental disorder), and the rules on attempt and participation (co-author, accomplice, instigator).

Penalties and their application

Understand the sentencing framework, suspended sentences, probation, community service, and the rules on recidivism and concurrence of offences. Know the statutes of limitation for prosecution and for enforcement.

Procedure

Master the phases: investigation (police, investigating judge, judicial inquiry), the pre-trial chamber, the trial court, and appeal. Know the rights of the defence, the presumption of innocence, the right to silence, and the exclusion of unlawfully obtained evidence, which is not automatic: courts weigh reliability, the seriousness of the violation, and the effect on fair trial.

Key procedural concepts

Distinguish the public prosecutor's role from the investigating judge's. Know arrest and detention rules, the maximum periods, and the role of the indictment chamber. Understand the difference between a complaint with civil party claim and a simple complaint.

Traps

Questions test whether a fact is justification or excuse, whether attempt is punishable for a given offence, and whether the limitation period was interrupted. Watch for confusion between detention for questioning and pre-trial detention.

Worked example

If an accused confesses after an unlawful search, the confession is not automatically void. The court asks whether the breach affected the reliability of the evidence and the fairness of the trial. If the confession is corroborated, it may be admitted; if it flows directly from the illegality, exclusion is likely.