The Subrogation That Was Almost Waived
Insurer Alfa pays a commercial client BGN 120,000 for water damage caused by a defective pipe installed by contractor Beta two years earlier. The policy contains a standard subrogation clause. Before the loss, the client had signed a construction contract with Beta containing a mutual waiver of liability for consequential loss, but not for direct property damage. After Alfa pays, its claims handler writes to the client asking it to sign a "full waiver of all rights against third parties" so the file can be closed. The client's in-house lawyer is unsure whether to sign. Meanwhile, the client has an outstanding BGN 40,000 invoice owed by Beta for unrelated work.
1. Explain Alfa's subrogation rights and whether the client should sign the waiver.
Read the worked answer
Subrogation: On paying the indemnity, Alfa steps into the insured's shoes to pursue the party legally liable - here, Beta - up to the amount paid (BGN 120,000). Subrogation protects the indemnity principle: the insured must not recover twice, and the insurer recovers what it paid from the wrongdoer.
Should the client sign? No. A "full waiver of all rights against third parties" would destroy Alfa's subrogation rights. That is not in the client's interest and may breach the policy's subrogation clause, which typically requires the insured to preserve the insurer's rights and not prejudice them. Signing could expose the client to a claim by Alfa for impairing its recovery.
What the client should do: Decline the broad waiver, confirm it will cooperate with Alfa's subrogated claim against Beta, and check the construction contract: the mutual waiver covers consequential loss only, so direct property damage claims remain live and Alfa can pursue Beta for the pipe damage. The BGN 40,000 invoice is unrelated and does not affect subrogation.
2. What happens if the client, before the loss, had validly released Beta from all liability for the water damage?
Read the worked answer
Effect on subrogation: If the insured had already released the liable third party before the loss, there is nothing for the insurer to step into - subrogation is extinguished. The insurer may then:
- Decline or reduce the claim, or
- Recover the payment back from the insured, depending on the policy wording, because the insured breached the duty not to prejudice the insurer's rights.
Judgement point: The broker should have identified the contractual waivers when placing the risk and either disclosed them to the insurer or negotiated a waiver-of-subrogation endorsement. This is the practical lesson: subrogation is not just a post-loss claims issue - it is a pre-placement underwriting question the intermediary must raise with the client.