Discharge summary with a hidden ACE-inhibitor history
You are reviewing a Bulgarian discharge summary for a 72-year-old man with arterial hypertension and type 2 diabetes. The summary lists: 'Еналаприл 10 mg 1-0-1; Метформин 850 mg 2 пъти дневно; Аспирин 75 mg вечер.' Under allergies: 'непоносимост към НСПВС'. Follow-up: 'контрол при ЛЛ след 7 дни'. The patient's daughter says he already takes 'Кардиоаспирин 75 mg' and has been using ibuprofen gel for knee pain. The GP's notes mention a previous episode of angioedema after an ACE inhibitor, but the discharge summary does not. You have 10 minutes before the patient arrives.
1. Identify the two highest-risk medication discrepancies in the discharge summary and explain which one you would resolve first. Use the wording of the Bulgarian text in your reasoning.
Read the worked answer
Highest-risk discrepancies
- Duplicate aspirin exposure. The summary orders 'Аспирин 75 mg вечер', while the daughter reports 'Кардиоаспирин 75 mg'. Cardioaspirin is aspirin, so the patient may take 150 mg/day unless one is stopped. This is a bleeding-risk issue and a clarity issue: the summary does not say whether the home product should be discontinued.
- Enalapril after angioedema. The GP notes record angioedema after an ACE inhibitor, but the discharge summary still lists 'Еналаприл 10 mg 1-0-1' and omits the reaction. Angioedema is a contraindication to ACE inhibitors, so this is the most urgent discrepancy: confirm the history and do not give enalapril until the prescriber is reached. Also note: 'непоносимост към НСПВС' plus ibuprofen gel is a caution, not automatically the same as systemic allergy; clarify what reaction occurred. The topical route has lower systemic exposure, but the patient should not use it without advice. Priority: resolve the ACE-inhibitor/angioedema issue first because it is potentially life-threatening; then reconcile aspirin.
2. Write two short Bulgarian questions for the daughter that would resolve the aspirin and allergy ambiguities without alarming her.
Read the worked answer
- 'Може ли да ми кажете дали той приема и Аспирин, и Кардиоаспирин, или само едното?' - this separates the two aspirin products.
- 'Каква реакция получи след лекарството за кръвно - оток на устните или лицето, или само кашлица?' - this distinguishes angioedema from the common ACE-inhibitor cough. Reasoning: the first question is closed enough to get a usable answer but names both products; the second avoids the technical term 'ангиоедем' and asks for observable signs. Do not ask 'алергичен ли е към НСПВС?' because the patient may not know the class.
3. State what you would document in Bulgarian before the patient arrives, using only confirmed facts.
Read the worked answer
Documentation: 'Пациентът е с АХ и ЗД тип 2. В епикризата са изписани Еналаприл 10 mg 1-0-1, Метформин 850 mg 2 пъти дневно и Аспирин 75 mg вечер. Дъщерята съобщава, че вкъщи приема Кардиоаспирин 75 mg. В бележките на ЛЛ има данни за ангиоедем след АСЕ-инхибитор, но това не е отразено в епикризата. Предстои уточняване на болкоуспокояващите и на реакцията към НСПВС.' Reasoning: each sentence is either directly in the summary, reported by the daughter, or in the GP notes; the unresolved items are marked as 'предстои уточняване', not as conclusions. This avoids repeating the summary's omission as if it were verified.