The Intra-Family Sale That Looks Like a Gift
A notary is asked to certify a deed by which a father transfers his one-half share in a two-room apartment to his adult son for a stated price of BGN 45,000. The market value of the whole apartment is about BGN 160,000. The father is 78, has a pension of BGN 700 per month and lives in the apartment. The son says the price will be paid 'over time' and produces no bank documents. The father has two other children from a previous marriage, one of whom has already asked a lawyer about 'the apartment going to the youngest'. The deed is presented as a sale because, the son says, 'a gift would cost more in taxes'. The notary also learns that the father has a pending enforcement case against him for a BGN 12,000 debt.
1. What risks arise from characterizing the transaction as a sale at this price, and what should the notary do?
Read the worked answer
The notary must not participate in a characterization chosen solely to reduce taxes. A sale at a price far below market value, with payment deferred and undocumented, may be recharacterized as a gift or as a simulated transaction. That matters for the other heirs, for the father's creditors and for the tax base. The notary should explain the difference between sale and gift, ask the parties to state the true cause, and record their declarations. If the parties insist on a sale, the notary should require a clear payment mechanism and evidence, and should not certify a price that appears fictitious. A notarial deed that conceals a gift may be attacked by the heirs or by the creditor, and the notary may face liability. The notary should also consider whether the father understands the consequences, given his age and the family pressure.
2. How does the pending enforcement case against the father affect the notary's assessment?
Read the worked answer
The pending enforcement for BGN 12,000 is a strong warning sign. A transfer of the father's only or main asset at an undervalue may be challenged as a transaction prejudicing creditors. The notary should ask about the enforcement case, check the property register for encumbrances, and consider whether the transfer leaves the father unable to pay. If the father remains living in the apartment and receives no real price, the arrangement looks like an attempt to remove an asset from enforcement. The notary should not certify until the parties have been advised of the risk and the true terms are established. The notary may proceed only with a transaction that has a genuine cause and a realistic price, and should document the advice given.
3. What should the notary explain to the father about his residence and the other heirs?
Read the worked answer
The notary should explain that transferring his share may affect his right to live in the apartment unless a right of residence or usufruct is reserved in the deed. If the father wishes to remain, that right should be expressly constituted and registered. The notary should also explain that the other children may have claims if the transfer is in reality a gift that infringes their reserved shares, and that a sale at a fictitious price may be treated as a gift. The father should confirm that he understands and acts freely. The notary should record the explanation and the father's response. If there is doubt about his capacity or about undue influence by the son, the notary should postpone and, if necessary, require a medical certificate.