BOMI RPA study materials
BOMI RPA study resources

The CAM Reconciliation Nobody Signed

BOMI RPA · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The CAM Reconciliation Nobody Signed

You are the property accountant for a 180,000 sq ft suburban office park with 14 tenants on modified gross leases. The 2023 operating expense reconciliation is due to tenants within 90 days of year-end, and you are at day 78. You discover that the prior manager charged $214,000 of roof replacement to Repairs & Maintenance rather than capitalizing it, and that the roof was a full tear-off with a 20-year expected life. The leases allow landlords to amortize capital improvements over their useful life with interest at 8%, but only for improvements required by law or to reduce operating expenses - not for replacement of worn-out components. Three tenants have audit rights above $50,000. One tenant, representing 22% of the park's square footage, has already emailed asking for the reconciliation package.

1. Determine how the $214,000 roof should be treated for the 2023 reconciliation and explain the exposure.

Read the worked answer

The roof is a capital replacement of a worn-out component, not a legal-compliance or expense-reduction improvement. Under the lease language, it cannot be passed through as an amortized capital item, and it cannot sit in R&M either. It must be removed from 2023 operating expenses and capitalized by the owner, with depreciation borne by the landlord.

Exposure: the $214,000 was spread across tenants by pro-rata share. If it was, say, 60% recoverable across occupied space, roughly $128,000 was over-billed, and the 22% tenant's share alone could be around $28,000. All three audit-right tenants can demand backup, and the lease language they will read is the same language that disqualifies the charge.

There is also a prior-year question: if the roof was charged in 2023, fine - but check whether any portion landed in 2022 and whether that reconciliation was already settled. Settled years are harder to reopen, but a tenant who discovers the error can still claim it, and the credibility cost with the 22% tenant is larger than the dollar amount. Escalate to ownership before the package goes out; do not let the tenant discover it first.

2. The 22% tenant asks for the package at day 78. Outline how you respond and what the reconciliation package should contain.

Read the worked answer

Respond promptly and honestly, but do not send a package you know is wrong. Acknowledge receipt, confirm the contractual deadline, and request a short extension - 30 days is reasonable given a restatement - in writing. Tenants generally grant extensions when asked before the deadline rather than after.

The corrected package should include: a summary of recoverable vs. non-recoverable expenses with the roof excluded and a clear note that it was reclassified; a general ledger detail by expense category with the landlord's admin fee shown separately; the pro-rata share calculation with the tenant's square footage and the denominator; the prior-year comparison; and a statement of the tenant's audit rights and how to exercise them.

Proactively disclose the reclassification. If the tenant finds the roof in the backup and you said nothing, you have converted an accounting error into a trust problem in the middle of a soft market. Offer the corrected statement and, if the tenant already paid 2023 estimates, a credit against the next billing cycle rather than a refund check if cash flow matters. Document the correction memo internally so the same error does not recur in 2024.