BPI HEP Energy Auditor study materials
BPI HEP Energy Auditor study resources

BPI HEP Energy Auditor cheat sheet

BPI HEP Energy Auditor · Keep the key ideas within reach.

Quick reference

Building Science and Home Performance Fundamentals

  • The house-as-a-system model treats envelope, HVAC, occupants, and pressure/thermal boundaries as coupled; a change to one component shifts airflow, moisture, and combustion safety elsewhere.

  • Stack effect pressure difference: ΔP = (ρ_out − ρ_in) × g × h; roughly 4 Pa per 3 m (10 ft) of height at 20 °C indoor-outdoor difference, driving infiltration low-to-high in winter.

  • Sensible heat equation: Q (Btu/h) = 1.08 × CFM × ΔT; latent: Q_latent = 0.68 × CFM × Δgrains, using 4.5 × CFM × Δenthalpy for total load.

  • R-value is conductive resistance (h·ft²·°F/Btu); U-value = 1/R; assembly U-values add in series, and framing fraction lowers whole-wall R-value below cavity R-value.

  • Air barrier, vapor retarder, and thermal boundary are distinct control layers; interior vapor retarders belong in cold climates, exterior in hot-humid climates.

  • Dew point location within an assembly determines condensation risk; vapor drive is high-to-low vapor pressure, typically outward in heating climates and inward in cooling climates.

  • Natural infiltration reference: ASHRAE 62.2 ventilation rate = 0.03 × floor area (ft²) + 7.5 × (bedrooms + 1) CFM, with infiltration credit applied.

  • Combustion safety: 50 Pa depressurization limit for atmospherically vented appliances is 5 Pa; spillage or backdrafting requires remediation before air sealing.

  • Thermal imaging interpretation: cool surfaces in winter indicate conductive or air-leak paths; confirm with blower door or smoke pencil before prescribing work.

Quick reference

Audit Data Collection and Diagnostic Testing

  • Blower door CFM50 converts to natural infiltration using the LBL/ASHRAE factor N ≈ 1/20 to 1/17; ELA (in²) ≈ CFM50 / 10 at 4 Pa reference.

  • CFM50 per ft² of conditioned floor area benchmarks airtightness: >0.7 high, 0.35–0.7 moderate, <0.35 tight for typical existing homes.

  • Duct leakage to outside uses a duct blaster plus blower door; subtract house leakage baseline, and target duct leakage ≤10% of system airflow where programs require.

  • Zone pressure diagnostics map pressure boundaries; a pressure difference across an attic floor indicates a connected leakage path, and gauges resolve hidden pathways.

  • Combustion analysis measures CO, CO2, O2, stack temperature, and draft; steady-state CO above ~100 ppm air-free in flue gas signals a problem requiring service.

  • CAZ testing: measure worst-case depressurization with doors closed and exhaust fans running; >5 Pa with natural-draft appliances triggers mitigation.

  • Infrared survey requires ≥10–15 °C (18–27 °F) indoor-outdoor ΔT and steady conditions; scan interior in heating season and exterior in cooling season.

  • Moisture measurement: pin meters read wood percent moisture content, pinless read relative; wood above 20% MC is at risk for decay and mold.

  • Airflow verification: measure static pressure across the air handler and fan curve, or use a flow hood/balometer; a dirty filter or coil raises static and drops delivered CFM.

Quick reference

Energy Modeling, Analysis, and Prioritizing Improvements

  • Degree-day method: annual heating energy (Btu) = UA × HDD × 24 × 1/ΔT_reference; use base 65 °F for HDD and CDD unless a balance point is known.

  • UA (Btu/h·°F) is the sum of area × U-value across envelope components; fuel-normalized UA can be back-calculated from utility bills and HDD.

  • Utility bill analysis: normalize by HDD/CDD, compare year over year, and separate base load (non-HVAC) from weather-dependent load.

  • Simple payback (years) = installed cost / annual savings; combine with SIR or NPV when incentives or fuel escalation alter the economics.

  • Prioritization hierarchy: health and safety > building durability and moisture > envelope and air sealing > HVAC and distribution > controls and renewables.

  • Marginal savings diminish; model improvements cumulatively because air sealing changes infiltration and reduces load on HVAC sizing.

  • Energy savings from envelope improvements scale with ΔT and HDD, so cooling-dominated and heating-dominated climates rank measures differently.

  • Verify assumptions: use measured blower door, duct leakage, and combustion data rather than defaults; default values inflate or deflate savings in modeling.

Quick reference

Work Scope Development, Standards, and Client Communication

  • Work scope must state measure, quantity, specification, and sequencing; each measure should reference a standard or manufacturer requirement.

  • ASHRAE 62.2 sets whole-building ventilation and local exhaust rates; BPI and IECC reference it for ventilation compliance after air sealing.

  • BPI standards require combustion appliance safety testing before and after work when air sealing or pressure changes affect the CAZ.

  • Client communication: document existing conditions, test-in results, and recommendations in writing; obtain informed consent for measures with health or cost tradeoffs.

  • Contractor scope should separate must-do health and safety items from optional efficiency upgrades, with clear pricing and warranty terms.

  • Air sealing scope must specify allowable materials and locations, and exclude areas near atmospherically vented appliances unless safety-tested.

  • Quality assurance: post-work blower door, duct leakage, and combustion testing verify performance; compare to test-in values and report percent improvement.

  • Change orders should be documented when field conditions differ from the audit; never silently substitute materials or delete safety measures.