Reading a Short Chronicle: Voice, Tense and Argument
A student must interpret a short chronicle-like narrative in which the narrator reports events in the past tense but repeatedly interrupts with comments such as 'and so it was that the town learned its lesson' and 'as everyone knows'. The narrator never names himself, claims to have witnessed some events, and describes other events that occurred before his birth. The exam asks the student to characterise the narrator and the narrative focus, and to judge whether the text should be read as testimony or as constructed argument. The student's draft says only: 'The narrator is first person because he says I.'
1. Characterise the narrator's position and explain why the simple label 'first person' is insufficient.
Read the worked answer
Analysis: The narrator speaks from within the story (homodiegetic tendency) but also comments from a position of superior knowledge ('as everyone knows'), and reports events before his birth. That mixture means he is not a neutral eyewitness.
Judgement: Calling him 'first person' describes only the grammatical person, not the narrative stance. The key features are his partial participation, his evaluative intrusions, and his claim to collective knowledge. The student's draft confuses a grammatical marker with a narrative function and must be rewritten to discuss reliability and perspective.
2. What is the effect of the past-tense narration combined with present-tense generalisations?
Read the worked answer
Analysis: The past tense narrates events; the present-tense formulas ('as everyone knows', 'so it was that...') turn those events into general lessons. This creates a didactic, almost moralising tone.
Judgement: The tense shift signals that the text is not pure record but interpretation: the narrator is shaping the past into an exemplum. A reader who treats the text as neutral testimony will miss the argumentative purpose. The student should cite at least one such formula and explain how it converts event into lesson.
3. How should the student decide between 'testimony' and 'constructed argument'?
Read the worked answer
Criteria: (1) Does the narrator claim direct witness? (2) Does he report events beyond possible experience? (3) Does he evaluate or generalise? (4) Whose knowledge does he invoke?
Application: The text claims witness for some events but also reports pre-birth events and invokes collective knowledge, so it mixes both modes. The defensible reading is 'constructed argument with testimonial gestures'.
Judgement: The student must argue from textual evidence, not from a label. A conclusion that names the mixed mode and justifies it with two or three quoted features would earn credit; a one-line label would not.