Personal Income Tax on Sale of Apartment and Use of Individual Entrepreneur Regime
In 2024, Ivan, a Belarusian resident, sold an apartment for BYN 150,000. He had purchased it in 2020 for BYN 100,000. He also sold a car for BYN 30,000, which he had bought in 2022 for BYN 25,000. Ivan is registered as an individual entrepreneur (IE) under the simplified tax system (STS) and provides IT services. His annual revenue from IT services is BYN 80,000. He also received dividends from a Belarusian company of BYN 10,000. Ivan filed a personal income tax (PIT) return for 2024, reporting only the IT income under STS and the dividends, but not the sale of the apartment and car, believing that as an IE he is exempt from PIT on personal property sales. The tax authority assessed PIT on the apartment sale (13% on the gain) and on the car sale (13% on the gain), and also imposed a penalty for failure to report. Ivan argues that the apartment was his personal residence and should be exempt, and that the car sale was not taxable because it was below the threshold. He also claims that the dividends were taxed at source, so he should not report them.
1. Determine Ivan's PIT liability for 2024 on the apartment sale, car sale, and dividends. Cite relevant Belarusian tax law.
Read the worked answer
Under Belarusian PIT law (Tax Code, Article 196), income from the sale of real estate is taxable at 13%. However, there is an exemption for income from the sale of a dwelling house, apartment, room, or share in them, if the taxpayer has owned the property for at least 5 years (Article 196.1.1). Ivan owned the apartment from 2020 to 2024, which is 4 years, less than 5, so the gain is taxable. The gain is BYN 50,000 (150,000 - 100,000). However, Ivan can reduce the taxable income by the amount of expenses related to the acquisition, but only if he has supporting documents. Assuming he does, the taxable base is BYN 50,000. PIT at 13% = BYN 6,500. For the car, income from the sale of a vehicle is taxable. There is no 5-year exemption for movable property. However, there is an exemption for income from the sale of a car if the taxpayer owned it for at least 3 years? Actually, under Article 196.1.2, income from the sale of a car is exempt if the car was owned for at least 3 years. Ivan owned it from 2022 to 2024, which is 2 years, so not exempt. The gain is BYN 5,000 (30,000 - 25,000). PIT at 13% = BYN 650. For dividends, under Article 188, dividends are subject to PIT at 13% (or 6%? Actually, dividends are taxed at 13% for residents). The tax agent (Belarusian company) should have withheld PIT at 13% and remitted it. Ivan is not required to report dividends if tax was withheld. However, if the tax agent did not withhold, Ivan must report. Assuming tax was withheld, Ivan does not need to include dividends in his return. But the tax authority assessed PIT on dividends? The problem states Ivan reported dividends, so maybe he included them. The tax authority assessed PIT on apartment and car only. So Ivan's PIT liability is BYN 6,500 + BYN 650 = BYN 7,150. He also failed to report, so a penalty under Article 55 of the Tax Code may apply (10% of unpaid tax). Ivan's argument about personal residence exemption is incorrect because the 5-year holding period was not met. The car sale threshold: there is no threshold; the 3-year ownership exemption applies. Dividends: if tax was withheld, no additional PIT. But Ivan must report the sale of apartment and car in his PIT return (if required). As an IE under STS, he is still a individual and must report personal income not related to IE activity. The STS replaces PIT on IE income, but not on personal income from sale of property. Therefore, Ivan is liable for PIT on the gains.
2. Discuss whether Ivan's status as an individual entrepreneur under the simplified tax system affects his obligation to pay PIT on the sale of personal property. Explain the interaction between STS and PIT.
Read the worked answer
Under Belarusian law, the simplified tax system (STS) is a special tax regime for individual entrepreneurs and small businesses. For individual entrepreneurs, STS replaces PIT on income from business activities, but it does not replace PIT on personal income not related to business activities. Article 327 of the Tax Code states that the use of STS by an individual entrepreneur does not exempt them from paying PIT on income from the sale of personal property, unless that property was used in business activities. The apartment and car were personal property, not used in Ivan's IT business. Therefore, Ivan must pay PIT on the gains from their sale, regardless of his STS status. The STS only covers his IT service income. Dividends are also personal income, but if tax was withheld at source, Ivan has no additional PIT liability. However, if the dividends were from a Belarusian company, the company is the tax agent and must withhold PIT at 13%. Ivan should report dividends only if tax was not withheld. Therefore, Ivan's argument that STS exempts him from PIT on property sales is incorrect. He must report and pay PIT on the apartment and car gains.