Transfer Pricing Risk for Intra-Group Services
Belarusian company Gamma is a subsidiary of a Russian group. In 2024, Gamma paid management fees of BYN 500,000 to its Russian parent for general management services, including strategic planning, financial control, and HR support. The Russian parent does not have a permanent establishment in Belarus. Gamma's revenue for 2024 was BYN 10 million, and profit before tax was BYN 1 million. The tax authority conducted a transfer pricing audit and proposed an adjustment, arguing that the management fees were not at arm's length because the Russian parent could not demonstrate that the services were actually rendered and that the fees were excessive. The tax authority used the transactional net margin method (TNMM) and determined that Gamma's profit margin should be higher, resulting in an additional profit tax of BYN 100,000. Gamma argues that the services were provided and that the fees are comparable to what independent parties would pay. Gamma also points out that the Russian parent is subject to tax in Russia and that the Belarus-Russia double tax treaty provides for the elimination of double taxation. The tax authority also imposed a 20% penalty for underpayment of tax and a 10% penalty for failure to submit transfer pricing documentation.
1. Evaluate the tax authority's transfer pricing adjustment. Discuss the burden of proof, the application of TNMM, and the documentation requirements under Belarusian law.
Read the worked answer
Under Belarusian transfer pricing rules (Tax Code, Article 30-1 and following), controlled transactions between related parties are subject to transfer pricing control. The tax authority may adjust the tax base if the transaction price differs from the arm's length price. The taxpayer bears the burden of proving that the price is arm's length. Gamma must provide documentation to support the management fees, including evidence that the services were actually rendered and that the fees are comparable to those charged by independent parties. The tax authority's use of TNMM is acceptable if it is the most appropriate method, but the tax authority must justify its application and the comparables used. The tax authority's argument that the services were not rendered is a factual issue; Gamma should provide contracts, reports, and correspondence to prove the services. If Gamma cannot prove the services were rendered, the fees may be disallowed entirely. Regarding the amount, the tax authority's TNMM adjustment must be based on reliable data. Gamma can challenge the comparables. The documentation requirement: under Article 30-1, taxpayers must submit transfer pricing documentation within 30 days of a request. If Gamma failed to submit, the 10% penalty may apply. The 20% penalty for underpayment applies if the adjustment is upheld. Gamma's argument about the treaty: the treaty may provide relief from double taxation, but it does not prevent the Belarusian tax authority from making a primary adjustment. Gamma would need to seek a corresponding adjustment in Russia or use mutual agreement procedures. The treaty's non-discrimination article does not apply. Therefore, the tax authority's adjustment is likely valid if it can substantiate the arm's length price. Gamma should consider providing documentation and negotiating with the tax authority, or appealing to the higher tax authority or court.
2. If Gamma had obtained an advance pricing agreement (APA) with the Belarusian tax authority, how would that affect the outcome? Discuss the availability and effect of APAs in Belarus.
Read the worked answer
Belarus does not have a formal advance pricing agreement (APA) program in its tax legislation. The Tax Code does not provide for APAs. Therefore, Gamma could not have obtained an APA. However, in practice, taxpayers may seek informal guidance from the tax authority, but this is not binding. If an APA were available, it would provide certainty on the transfer pricing methodology for a specified period, and the tax authority would be bound by it, reducing the risk of adjustment. Since no APA exists, Gamma must rely on documentation and the arm's length principle. The absence of an APA does not affect the tax authority's ability to adjust, but it means Gamma has no upfront certainty. Gamma could still use the mutual agreement procedure under the treaty if double taxation arises.