Four Thousand Dollars and a Room Full of Chairs
You are the only kinesiologist at a non-profit seniors' centre serving a neighbourhood where 40% of residents are low-income and 30% speak a primary language other than English. The centre has a $4,000 annual budget for exercise programming, a 15 m × 8 m hall with no equipment, and 32 members over 70 who mostly sit for nine hours a day. Attendance at the current drop-in class has fallen from 22 to 7 since it moved to 7 a.m., and two members have fallen at home in the past three months. Board members want you to buy treadmills and start a "Biggest Loser" weight-loss contest with prizes. You have until the next board meeting in six weeks to bring a plan.
1. How do you respond to the board's proposal? Build the argument, don't just reject it.
Read the worked answer
Acknowledge the instinct - the board wants visible action and measurable results, which is exactly what a good program should deliver, just not this way.
Against treadmills: three or four machines would consume most of a $4,000 budget and deliver, at best, a few minutes each of supervised walking for a handful of members. They need supervision, maintenance, and a power supply; they carry a real fall risk for people with balance problems getting on and off; and they exclude anyone who cannot afford the time slot or manage the step-up. Four treadmills for 32 members is a poor ratio and a poor return.
Against a weight-loss contest: prizes for the largest percentage of body weight lost reward dehydration and crash dieting in older adults, where unintended weight loss is often a marker of frailty and illness rather than success. It publicly ranks bodies in a group that already faces stigma, it drives away the members who most need to move, and it addresses a goal the evidence does not show to be the main lever for their health. For people over 70 who sit nine hours a day with two recent falls, the outcomes that matter are strength, balance, and function - not kilograms.
Propose the trade: "Give me the same $4,000 and six weeks, and I'll show you attendance, retention, and a functional measure before we commit to capital equipment."
2. Design the first 12 weeks. Address attendance, language, cost, transport, and fall prevention, and name the behaviour-change reasoning you are using.
Read the worked answer
Timing and access. Move the class to mid-morning (10:00–11:00), after the transit pass window and after morning medications, and keep it on the same two or three days every week - predictability matters more than frequency. Partner with a local taxi or volunteer driver roster for the two members with mobility limitations; bus tickets in the budget line.
Content (three pillars, all evidence-aligned):
- Strength: chair-based and standing sit-to-stand, band rows, step-ups to a low platform, 2–3 sets of 8–12, twice weekly, plus a home program of the same movements.
- Balance: progressive, challenging, and unsupervised-safe - heel-toe walking, weight shifting, one-leg stance with counter support, tai chi-style sequences. This is the direct response to the two falls.
- Sitting interruption: a short standing or walking break every 30 minutes of class, and a simple "stand up every hour at home" prompt with a fridge magnet in the top three languages.
Behaviour-change reasoning. Use a social-cognitive and self-determination frame: build self-efficacy through small mastered successes, pair members as buddies for attendance and belonging (relatedness), and let the group choose the music, the warm-up, and the progressions (autonomy). Add a short goal-setting conversation in week one and a review in week six. The 7 a.m. collapse is a classic capability–opportunity problem - the schedule, not the motivation, broke it.
Cost. Bands, mats, a few chairs with arms, printed translated materials, interpreter honoraria, healthy snacks, transport vouchers, and a portable blood pressure cuff. Well under $4,000, with room for a second 12-week block.
Language. Bilingual peer leaders from within the group; demonstration over instruction; a one-page visual handout.
3. How will you evaluate it, and what will you actually put in front of the board in six weeks?
Read the worked answer
Evaluate on reach, effectiveness, and sustainability rather than on a single number that flatters the program.
Reach and adoption: number of unique attendees, new versus returning, attendance rate, dropout and reason for dropout, and whether the group reflects the neighbourhood's language mix.
Effectiveness - simple, repeatable, no equipment:
- 30-second chair stand (number of stands)
- Timed Up and Go
- 4-stage balance test
- Self-reported falls and near-falls, and confidence on stairs
- A single-item self-rated health and a two-question social connection measure
Measure at baseline, week 6, and week 12. Report change at the group level with the range, not just the mean, and state plainly that you are not running a controlled trial - this is program evaluation.
Sustainability: cost per participant per session, volunteer hours, space utilization, and whether the home program is being done (simple self-report log).
The six-week board package: a one-page summary of what happened in the pilot, three charts (attendance, chair stand, Timed Up and Go), two participant quotes with written consent, a budget showing what $4,000 bought, and one clear ask - release the remaining funds for a second 12-week block and a home-visit falls check with a partner occupational therapist. Bring a member with you to speak. Boards fund what they can see working; a timetable for a second block is far more persuasive than a treadmill quote.