CDCR Correctional Officer Written Selection Exam key terms
CDCR Correctional Officer Written Selection Exam · Get comfortable with the vocabulary.
- Main idea
- Related: Topic sentence, Supporting detail, Summary
The most important point a paragraph or passage makes about its topic. It may be stated outright in a topic sentence or left for the reader to assemble from the details.
- Supporting detail
- Related: Main idea, Inference
A specific fact, example, reason, or description that explains or backs up a passage's main idea. Details answer who, what, when, where, and why questions about the central point.
- Inference
- Related: Main idea, Context clue
A conclusion a reader reaches by combining what the text states with ordinary background knowledge. The idea is not written directly but is strongly suggested by the evidence given.
- Summary
- Related: Main idea, Supporting detail
A short restatement of a passage's key points in your own words, leaving out minor details and repeated examples. A good summary keeps the original's meaning and emphasis without copying its wording.
- Context clue
- Related: Inference
Words, phrases, or examples near an unfamiliar word that help a reader work out its meaning. Clues may restate the idea, contrast it, or show how the word is used in the situation.
- Opinion statement
- Related: Main idea, Inference
A sentence that expresses a belief, judgment, or feeling rather than something provable. Words such as should, best, seems, or unfairly often signal that a statement is opinion rather than fact.
- Topic sentence
- Related: Main idea, Supporting detail
The sentence, usually placed first in a paragraph, that names the paragraph's central point and signals what the following sentences will explain or support.
- Author's tone
- Related: Main idea, Opinion statement
The attitude a writer takes toward the subject, such as neutral, urgent, sympathetic, or critical. Word choice and which details the writer includes or omits create that attitude.
- Subject-verb agreement
- Related: Pronoun-antecedent agreement, Verb tense consistency
The rule that a verb must match its subject in number and person. A singular subject takes a singular verb, and a plural subject takes a plural verb, even when words sit between them.
- Pronoun-antecedent agreement
- Related: Subject-verb agreement, Parallel structure
The rule that a pronoun must match the noun it stands for in number and gender. A singular antecedent such as each officer requires a singular pronoun such as his or her.
- Sentence fragment
- Related: Run-on sentence, Comma splice
A group of words capitalized and punctuated as a sentence but missing a subject, a verb, or a complete thought, so it cannot stand alone.
- Run-on sentence
- Related: Comma splice, Sentence fragment
Two or more complete sentences joined with no punctuation or connecting word at all. The reader cannot tell where one idea ends and the next begins.
- Comma splice
- Related: Run-on sentence, Sentence fragment
A specific error in which two complete sentences are joined by only a comma. It needs a period, a semicolon, or a conjunction such as and or because.
- Dangling modifier
- Related: Parallel structure, Active voice
A descriptive phrase that does not clearly attach to the word it is meant to describe, so the sentence seems to say something illogical or unintended.
- Parallel structure
- Related: Dangling modifier, Pronoun-antecedent agreement
Using the same grammatical form for items in a list or comparison, such as all verbs or all noun phrases, so the sentence reads smoothly and logically.
- Active voice
- Related: Dangling modifier, Parallel structure
Sentence construction in which the subject performs the action, as in the officer wrote the report. Active voice is usually clearer and more direct than passive voice.
- Homophone
- Related: Subject-verb agreement
One of two or more words that sound the same but differ in spelling and meaning, such as their and there, or to, too, and two. Choosing the wrong one is a common spelling error.
- Verb tense consistency
- Related: Subject-verb agreement, Parallel structure
Keeping verbs in the same tense, or in a logically connected tense, within a sentence or passage. Shifting tense without reason confuses the reader about when events happened.
- Percent
- Related: Ratio, Proportion
A ratio that compares a number to one hundred. Twenty-five percent means twenty-five out of every hundred, which can also be written as the decimal 0.25 or the fraction one fourth.
- Ratio
- Related: Proportion, Unit rate
A comparison of two quantities by division, often written with a colon or the word to, showing how much of one thing exists relative to another.
- Proportion
- Related: Ratio, Unit rate
An equation stating that two ratios are equal. Proportions are used to solve scaling problems, such as finding a distance on a map or adjusting a recipe or staffing level.
- Unit rate
- Related: Ratio, Proportion
A rate expressed per single unit of measure, such as miles per hour or cost per item. You find it by dividing one quantity by the other.
- Mean
- Related: Percent, Rounding
The arithmetic average of a set of values, found by adding all the values and dividing the sum by how many values there are.
- Order of operations
- Related: Rounding, Percent
The agreed sequence for evaluating a math expression: parentheses first, then exponents, then multiplication and division left to right, then addition and subtraction left to right.
- Rounding
- Related: Mean, Order of operations
Replacing a number with a nearby value that has fewer digits. If the next digit is five or higher you round up; if it is four or lower you keep the digit as it is.
- Premise
- Related: Assumption, Deductive reasoning
A statement offered as evidence or a reason inside an argument. Premises are the support that is supposed to justify accepting the argument's conclusion.
- Assumption
- Related: Premise, Logical fallacy
A belief that an argument depends on but never states outright. A conclusion fails if its hidden assumption is false, so identifying assumptions is central to judging reasoning.
- Deductive reasoning
- Related: Inductive reasoning, Conditional statement
Reasoning that moves from general rules to a specific conclusion. When the premises are true and the logic is valid, the conclusion must be true.
- Inductive reasoning
- Related: Deductive reasoning, Premise
Reasoning that moves from specific observations to a broad general conclusion. The conclusion is only probable, because a future case could contradict the pattern observed so far.
- Logical fallacy
- Related: Assumption, Premise
A recognizable pattern of flawed reasoning, such as attacking the person instead of the argument or appealing to popularity, that makes a conclusion unreliable even if it sounds convincing.
- Conditional statement
- Related: Deductive reasoning, Assumption
A statement in if-then form, naming a condition and the result that follows from it, such as if the door is locked then the inmate cannot enter through it.
- Active listening
- Related: Empathy, De-escalation
Giving full attention to a speaker, noticing both the content and the feeling behind the words, and confirming understanding by restating or asking clarifying questions.
- De-escalation
- Related: Active listening, Discretion
Techniques such as calm speech, steady eye contact, lowered voice, and giving physical space that reduce tension before a confrontation turns into violence.
- Chain of command
- Related: Discretion, Confidentiality
The formal line of authority through which orders and information travel in an organization. Following it means reporting to your direct supervisor rather than skipping levels.
- Confidentiality
- Related: Chain of command, Discretion
The duty to keep sensitive information private and share it only with people who have a legitimate need to know it for official purposes.
- Empathy
- Related: Active listening, De-escalation
Understanding and acknowledging what another person is feeling, without necessarily agreeing with or excusing that person's behavior.
- Discretion
- Related: De-escalation, Chain of command
The judgment to choose among lawful responses in a situation, weighing policy, safety, and fairness rather than applying one fixed reaction every time.