CSO (Other exams) study plan
CSO · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
The Scrum Team & Scrum Theory and Principles
Explain how empiricism, transparency, inspection, and adaptation underpin every Scrum choice
Distinguish the three accountabilities and list each one's exclusive obligations
Describe why the Scrum Team is self-managing and cross-functional, and what those terms do not mean
Map the five Scrum values to observable team behaviors you could witness in a Sprint Review
Your checkpoint
A one-page comparison table of the three accountabilities with their duties and a 10-item true/false quiz you write and answer on Scrum theory, scoring 9/10 or better
Scrum Artifacts and Commitments & The Scrum Team
Define each artifact and state the commitment attached to it
Explain how the Product Goal shapes Product Backlog ordering decisions
Describe the Definition of Done as a commitment for the Increment and who creates it
Trace how a Product Backlog item moves from idea to a Done Increment
Your checkpoint
A written walkthrough of one realistic product backlog item moving from refinement through Done, annotated with the artifact and commitment governing each step
Scrum Events & Scrum Theory and Principles
State the purpose, timebox, attendees, and expected outputs of each of the five events
Explain why Sprint Planning answers why, what, and how in that order
Describe how the Daily Scrum belongs to the Developers and how a Scrum Master supports without directing
Justify the Sprint as a container for the other four events
Your checkpoint
A one-page event reference card covering all five events with purpose, timebox, participants, and outputs, self-checked against your notes with zero factual errors
Scrum Events & Scrum Artifacts and Commitments
Explain how the Sprint Review invites stakeholder collaboration rather than serving as a status report
Describe the Retrospective's role in inspecting process and adapting the Definition of Done or working agreements
Connect each event's output to the artifact it updates
Identify common anti-patterns such as turning the Daily Scrum into a status meeting
Your checkpoint
A 400-word case analysis of a team whose Sprint Review has become a demo-only status meeting, proposing three specific changes tied to Scrum theory
Servant Leadership and Facilitation & Removing Impediments and Enabling Improvement
Distinguish servant leadership behaviors from command-and-control behaviors in concrete scenarios
Facilitate a decision-making technique that keeps the team's ownership intact
Define an impediment and separate it from a task or a technical problem
Draft escalation language that removes a blocker without taking ownership away from the team
Your checkpoint
A facilitation run sheet for a 45-minute working session plus a written impediment escalation script, each reviewed against servant leadership criteria
Coaching and Mentoring Teams & Removing Impediments and Enabling Improvement
Apply a coaching stance that asks rather than tells when a team brings you a problem
Design a feedback conversation using specific observable behavior instead of personality judgments
Identify when mentoring is appropriate and when coaching is the better choice
Build a lightweight improvement experiment with a hypothesis, a measure, and a review date
Your checkpoint
A coaching conversation plan for a struggling Scrum Master or Developer scenario, including five open questions and the improvement experiment you would co-create
Scaling Scrum and Organizational Agility & Servant Leadership and Facilitation
Explain how Scrum scales through coordination across teams rather than a separate process layer
Describe the tradeoffs of shared backlogs, shared Definitions of Done, and cross-team dependencies
Identify organizational policies that undermine self-management and propose alternatives
Plan how a Scrum Master influences change outside the team boundary
Your checkpoint
A two-page organizational agility assessment of a hypothetical company, naming three structural impediments and one concrete intervention for each
Scrum Theory and Principles & The Scrum Team & Scrum Events & Scrum Artifacts and Commitments & Servant Leadership and Facilitation & Coaching and Mentoring Teams & Removing Impediments and Enabling Improvement & Scaling Scrum and Organizational Agility
Consolidate all eight domains into a single concept map showing how theory, team, events, and artifacts interlock
Rehearse scenario-based questions under timed conditions and review every miss against its source concept
Re-teach your two weakest domains in writing as if explaining them to a new Scrum Master
Verify you can state every definition, timebox, and commitment without notes
Your checkpoint
A timed 60-question practice set completed at 85% or better, plus a written error log linking each miss to a domain and a corrective note
Milestones
Week 2: Without notes, name all three artifacts, their commitments, and the three accountabilities with one duty each
Week 4: Explain to another person why each Scrum event exists and what would break if it were removed, covering all five events
Week 6: Demonstrate a coaching response to a scripted team problem, scoring at least 4 of 5 on a rubric of asking versus telling
Week 8: Score 85% or higher on a timed 60-question mixed-domain practice set and show an error log with a corrective note for every miss