CPATA Patent Knowledge study plan
CPATA Patent Knowledge · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Canadian Patent Act and Patent Rules
Map the structure of the Canadian Patent Act (sections on patentability, application, examination, and rights) and annotate the ten provisions most frequently tested.
Trace the lifecycle of a Canadian patent application from filing to grant using the Patent Rules, noting each deadline and the consequence of missing it.
Distinguish the statutory categories of invention under section 2 and explain how the Act treats excluded subject matter such as mere scientific principles and methods of medical treatment.
Build a one-page timeline of the major amendments to the Patent Act and Patent Rules since 2019 and identify which transitional provisions apply to applications filed before each change.
Draft a glossary of 40 statutory terms (for example, 'claim date', 'prescribed', 'request for examination') with the section or rule where each appears.
Your checkpoint
A 10-page annotated outline of the Patent Act and Patent Rules with section references and a one-page amendment timeline.
Canadian Patent Act and Patent Rules & Prosecution before the Canadian Intellectual Property Office
Simulate a full examination sequence: draft a request for examination, a response to a first office action, and a final response within the statutory response periods.
Calculate and record every key prosecution deadline (request for examination, national phase entry, response to office action, issue fee) for three hypothetical filing dates, including any extensions available under the Rules.
Compare the Canadian prosecution process with the PCT national phase and identify the documents and translations required at each stage.
Explain the options for correcting errors in a filed application (for example, obvious mistakes, clerical errors) and when each mechanism is available.
List the grounds on which the Commissioner may refuse an application and the appeal route to the Federal Court.
Your checkpoint
A completed prosecution simulation file containing a request for examination, two office action responses, and a deadline calculation worksheet for three filing dates.
Patentability and validity (subject matter, novelty, obviousness, utility) & Claim drafting and specification preparation
Apply the four patentability requirements (subject matter, novelty, obviousness, utility) to five fact patterns and write a reasoned conclusion for each.
Distinguish anticipation from obviousness using the Canadian tests and explain how the claim date and the person skilled in the art affect each analysis.
Draft a complete claim set (independent and dependent claims) for a mechanical invention and a software-related invention, ensuring each claim is clear, supported, and distinct in scope.
Prepare a specification that satisfies the description and enablement requirements, including a best-mode disclosure and a set of drawings descriptions.
Identify the most common claim-drafting defects that lead to office actions (lack of clarity, undue breadth, missing essential elements) and propose a correction for each.
Your checkpoint
A full draft patent application (specification plus claims) for one invention, with a self-assessment checklist showing how each patentability requirement is met.
Canadian Patent Act and Patent Rules & Prosecution before the Canadian Intellectual Property Office & Patentability and validity (subject matter, novelty, obviousness, utility)
Complete a timed 60-question practice set covering the Patent Act, Patent Rules, patentability, and prosecution, and score at least 75 percent.
Review every incorrect answer and write a short explanation citing the relevant section or rule.
Explain the utility requirement in Canadian practice, including the promise doctrine and how it is assessed at the claim date.
Describe the process for amending claims during prosecution and the limits on amendments that add matter.
Summarize the Commissioner's discretion in extending time and the circumstances in which it will be exercised.
Your checkpoint
A scored practice exam with a written error log identifying the statutory basis for each missed question.
PCT and international/foreign filing strategy & Related IP law and transitional provisions
Outline the PCT filing process from priority filing through international search, publication, and national phase entry, including the 30-month deadline for Canada.
Compare the cost, timing, and strategic implications of filing directly in Canada, via the PCT, and via the Paris Convention.
Identify the key differences between Canadian patent law and the laws of the United States and the European Patent Office on novelty, grace period, and subject matter eligibility.
Explain how related IP rights (trademarks, industrial designs, copyright) interact with patent protection and when each is the appropriate vehicle.
Describe the transitional provisions that apply to applications filed before the 2019 amendments and how they affect prosecution strategy.
Your checkpoint
A two-page international filing strategy memo comparing direct Canadian filing, PCT, and Paris Convention routes for a hypothetical client, with a cost and timeline table.
Infringement, validity challenges, and remedies & Ownership, assignments, licences, and employee inventions
Analyze an infringement scenario: identify the claims asserted, apply the claim construction principles, and determine whether the elements are present in the accused product.
Draft a statement of defence and counterclaim for invalidity based on anticipation and obviousness, citing the relevant statutory provisions.
Explain the remedies available for infringement (injunction, damages, accounting of profits, delivery up) and the factors a court considers.
Distinguish the rights of a patent owner from those of an exclusive licensee and describe how each may enforce the patent.
Trace the ownership chain for an employee invention, including the presumptions under the Act and the effect of an assignment clause.
Your checkpoint
A mock litigation memo (infringement and validity analysis) plus a one-page ownership flowchart for an employee invention scenario.
Infringement, validity challenges, and remedies & Ownership, assignments, licences, and employee inventions & Professional responsibility, ethics, and practice management
Draft a licence agreement term sheet covering scope, royalties, sublicensing, termination, and dispute resolution.
Apply the rules of professional conduct to three ethical scenarios (conflict of interest, confidentiality, and communication with an unrepresented party) and write a reasoned resolution for each.
Describe the record-keeping and client-account requirements that apply to patent agents in Canada.
Explain the consequences of an inadvertent disclosure of a client's invention and the steps a patent agent must take.
Summarize the patent agent's duty to the Commissioner and the limits on advertising and solicitation.
Your checkpoint
A licence term sheet and a written ethics casebook with three scenarios and resolutions citing the applicable conduct rules.
Canadian Patent Act and Patent Rules & Patentability and validity (subject matter, novelty, obviousness, utility) & Claim drafting and specification preparation & Prosecution before the Canadian Intellectual Property Office & PCT and international/foreign filing strategy & Infringement, validity challenges, and remedies & Ownership, assignments, licences, and employee inventions & Professional responsibility, ethics, and practice management & Related IP law and transitional provisions
Complete two full-length timed mock exams under exam conditions and score at least 80 percent on each.
Review all incorrect answers and produce a consolidated list of weak areas with a targeted review plan for each.
Recite the key statutory deadlines and the sections of the Patent Act and Patent Rules that create them without reference to notes.
Explain the patentability requirements and the prosecution sequence in a five-minute oral summary to test recall.
Finalize a one-page exam-day checklist covering timing, question strategy, and common traps.
Your checkpoint
Two completed mock exams with a scored error analysis and a final one-page exam-day checklist.
Milestones
Week 2: Can recite the key prosecution deadlines and the corresponding Patent Rules provisions from memory, and has completed the prosecution simulation file.
Week 4: Scores at least 75 percent on the timed 60-question practice set and has a written error log for every missed question.
Week 6: Produces a coherent infringement and validity analysis and a correct ownership flowchart without referring to the Act.
Week 8: Scores at least 80 percent on two full-length mock exams and has a final exam-day checklist ready.