Sequencing and Transition Problems in a Five-Sentence Quarterly Report Paragraph
You are editing a five-sentence paragraph in a branch quarterly report. The paragraph describes a pilot intake process and is meant to end with the region's next step. The sentences, currently in the order A–E, are:
A. 'However, the pilot project revealed two recurring problems.' B. 'In January, the region introduced a new intake process for client applications.' C. 'The first was an increase in incomplete forms.' D. 'As a result, the region plans to revise the form and add a help line.' E. 'The second was a backlog at the verification stage.'
The report's editor says the paragraph 'doesn't flow' and suspects both a sequencing problem and a misuse of a transition. The paragraph will be read by 30 managers who have no operational background. You have one revision pass and must not add new content; you may reorder sentences and change connecting words only.
1. Give the correct order of the five sentences and justify it in terms of cohesion, not personal taste.
Read the worked answer
The coherent order is B–A–C–E–D. B establishes the background: a new intake process was introduced in January. A evaluates that process and announces that there were two problems. C and E enumerate the problems in the order announced ('the first ... the second ...'), so they must follow A and must stay in that order. D gives the consequence, a planned revision, and belongs last because it depends on both problems having been stated.
Reordering C and E would break the 'first/second' signposting. Placing D before E would make 'As a result' appear to follow from only one problem. Put differently, the paragraph moves from general to specific to consequence: context, finding, detail, detail, action. That is the sequence a reader without operational background needs in order to follow the logic in one pass. Cohesion here comes from lexical signposts ('the first', 'the second', 'as a result') that must match the order in which the ideas appear.
2. Identify the misused transition, explain why it fails, and propose a fix consistent with the no-new-content constraint.
Read the worked answer
The doubtful connector is 'However' at the start of A. 'However' signals that what follows contradicts what precedes. But B reports a neutral administrative fact - the region introduced a process - not an expectation that the process would succeed. There is nothing for A to contradict, so the transition overreaches and the reader looks for a contrast that is not there.
Because you may not add content such as 'expecting it to reduce errors', the fix is to remove the connector and let A state the finding directly: 'The pilot project revealed two recurring problems.' If a connector is required, a neutral one such as 'The pilot project then revealed...' works, but plain deletion is cleaner. By contrast, 'As a result' in D is correct, because the revision genuinely follows from the two problems. The test for any transition is to ask what specific idea it points back to; if you cannot name that idea, the transition is doing no work and should go.
3. After reordering and fixing the transition, do a final proofreading pass for agreement, reference, and precision. What, if anything, still needs attention?
Read the worked answer
Agreement and reference are sound in the revised paragraph. 'The region introduced' and 'the region plans' are both singular and consistent. 'Two recurring problems' is correctly followed by 'The first ... The second ...', and 'the first' and 'the second' have clear antecedents. The colon-free enumeration is fine because the signposts do the work.
One precision issue remains: 'an increase in incomplete forms' can be read as an increase in the number of forms rather than in their rate. If the underlying data are rates, write 'an increase in the proportion of incomplete forms'; if raw counts, keep the original. That is an editing choice, not a grammar error. Also confirm that 'verification stage' is defined elsewhere in the report, since 30 managers without operational background will not know it. The revised paragraph reads: 'In January, the region introduced a new intake process for client applications. The pilot project revealed two recurring problems. The first was an increase in incomplete forms. The second was a backlog at the verification stage. As a result, the region plans to revise the form and add a help line.'