SAMRA study plan
SAMRA · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Fundamentals of Risk Management and Risk Assessment
Define risk, uncertainty, hazard, and opportunity in your own words and distinguish risk from issue and from impact
Explain the ISO 31000 risk management process steps and how they map onto the SAMRA exam domains
Differentiate inherent, residual, and target risk and compute each from a simple likelihood-times-consequence example
Compare qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative assessment approaches and state when each is defensible
Build a risk appetite versus risk tolerance distinction with one worked organizational example
Your checkpoint
A one-page glossary plus a worked table showing inherent, residual, and target ratings for five sample risks, with the rating method justified in two sentences each
Fundamentals of Risk Management and Risk Assessment & Risk Identification, Analysis, and Evaluation
Apply at least four risk identification techniques (brainstorming, structured interviews, checklist, SWOT, scenario analysis) to one case organization
Construct a cause-event-consequence statement for each identified risk so the risk is testable
Perform a bow-tie analysis linking threats, preventive controls, the top event, mitigative controls, and consequences
Classify risks by source and by category using a consistent taxonomy
Evaluate identified risks against criteria to decide which require treatment
Your checkpoint
A risk register of at least 15 risks for one case organization, each with cause-event-consequence wording, category, owner, and an evaluation decision (accept, treat, transfer, avoid)
Risk Identification, Analysis, and Evaluation & Risk Treatment and Control
Quantify likelihood and consequence using calibrated scales and document what each scale anchor means
Select and justify a control strategy from the treatment options (avoid, reduce, transfer, accept, exploit, share) for each high-priority risk
Design a hierarchy-of-controls argument for three risks, showing why a lower-order control was rejected
Distinguish detective, preventive, and corrective controls and place each in a control map
Identify control ownership, timing, and cost so treatment plans are actionable
Your checkpoint
A treatment plan covering the top eight risks, each with selected strategy, hierarchy-of-controls rationale, owner, due date, and expected residual rating
Risk Treatment and Control & Governance, Frameworks, and Standards
Map the organization's risk framework against ISO 31000 principles, framework, and process clauses and note gaps
Explain how COSO ERM components connect to governance structures such as a board risk committee and a three-lines model
Define roles and responsibilities for risk ownership across the first, second, and third lines
Draft risk criteria and appetite statements that a governance body could actually approve
Compare at least two risk management standards or guidance documents and state where they diverge
Your checkpoint
A gap analysis table mapping at least 12 framework elements to current organizational practice, each with a gap rating and a recommended governance action, plus a one-paragraph board-ready risk appetite statement
Risk Communication and Reporting & Monitoring, Review, and Continuous Improvement
Design a risk reporting pack for three audiences (board, executive, operational) with the right level of aggregation for each
Write risk statements and heat-map commentary that avoid vague language and state movement since the last period
Define key risk indicators with thresholds, data sources, and escalation triggers
Build a monitoring calendar that assigns review frequency by risk velocity and severity
Describe how to close the loop from monitoring findings into updated assessments and treatment plans
Your checkpoint
A two-page risk report for one audience, including a heat map with period-on-period movement, three key risk indicators with thresholds, and an escalation log with two sample triggers
Monitoring, Review, and Continuous Improvement & Risk Management in Projects and Programs
Explain how project risk management differs from enterprise risk management in scope, horizon, and ownership
Build a project risk breakdown structure covering technical, schedule, cost, resource, and external categories
Apply qualitative screening and quantitative techniques such as expected monetary value and Monte Carlo logic to a project case
Integrate program-level and project-level risks, including escalation and aggregation of correlated risks
Design a lessons-learned and post-implementation review process that feeds continuous improvement
Your checkpoint
A project risk plan for a 12-month initiative with a risk breakdown structure, an expected monetary value calculation for the contingency reserve, and an escalation path to program level
Emerging Risks and Organizational Resilience & Risk Management in Projects and Programs
Scan for emerging risks using horizon scanning, scenario planning, and weak-signal analysis, and record the method used
Assess at least three emerging risk themes such as cyber, climate, supply chain concentration, AI, or workforce change for organizational relevance
Define organizational resilience in terms of absorptive, adaptive, and restorative capacity and connect it to business continuity
Test a continuity plan against a plausible disruption scenario and identify single points of failure
Distinguish emerging risk from known risk and explain why standard registers underrepresent it
Your checkpoint
An emerging risk and resilience brief covering three themes with likelihood and impact rationale, one stress-test narrative, and five prioritized resilience actions
Fundamentals of Risk Management and Risk Assessment & Risk Identification, Analysis, and Evaluation & Risk Treatment and Control & Risk Communication and Reporting & Monitoring, Review, and Continuous Improvement & Governance, Frameworks, and Standards & Risk Management in Projects and Programs & Emerging Risks and Organizational Resilience
Consolidate all eight domains into a single one-page concept map showing how they interlock
Complete two timed practice sets and analyze every error by domain and by failure type (knowledge gap, misread, or reasoning error)
Re-teach the three weakest sub-topics aloud or in writing without notes to confirm retention
Rehearse the calculation types (residual risk, expected monetary value, control effectiveness) under time pressure
Finalize an exam-day strategy covering question triage, time per item, and handling of ambiguous wording
Your checkpoint
A scored practice summary showing domain-by-domain accuracy, a list of the five weakest sub-topics with corrective notes, and a written exam-day timing plan
Milestones
Week 2: You can produce a cause-event-consequence risk statement for any scenario in under two minutes and defend its category and owner
Week 4: You can explain, without notes, how ISO 31000 and COSO ERM differ in emphasis and where each fits in a governance structure, and your appetite statement survives a challenge from a skeptical board member
Week 6: You can move a risk from project to program level correctly, compute expected monetary value for a contingency reserve, and justify the escalation decision
Week 8: Practice-set accuracy is at or above 75 percent overall with no domain below 60 percent, and every missed item has a written corrective note