SAMRA study materials
SAMRA study resources

SAMRA study plan

SAMRA · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 6 hours per week

Week 1

Fundamentals of Risk Management and Risk Assessment

  • Define risk, uncertainty, hazard, and opportunity in your own words and distinguish risk from issue and from impact

  • Explain the ISO 31000 risk management process steps and how they map onto the SAMRA exam domains

  • Differentiate inherent, residual, and target risk and compute each from a simple likelihood-times-consequence example

  • Compare qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative assessment approaches and state when each is defensible

  • Build a risk appetite versus risk tolerance distinction with one worked organizational example

Your checkpoint

A one-page glossary plus a worked table showing inherent, residual, and target ratings for five sample risks, with the rating method justified in two sentences each

Week 2

Fundamentals of Risk Management and Risk Assessment & Risk Identification, Analysis, and Evaluation

  • Apply at least four risk identification techniques (brainstorming, structured interviews, checklist, SWOT, scenario analysis) to one case organization

  • Construct a cause-event-consequence statement for each identified risk so the risk is testable

  • Perform a bow-tie analysis linking threats, preventive controls, the top event, mitigative controls, and consequences

  • Classify risks by source and by category using a consistent taxonomy

  • Evaluate identified risks against criteria to decide which require treatment

Your checkpoint

A risk register of at least 15 risks for one case organization, each with cause-event-consequence wording, category, owner, and an evaluation decision (accept, treat, transfer, avoid)

Week 3

Risk Identification, Analysis, and Evaluation & Risk Treatment and Control

  • Quantify likelihood and consequence using calibrated scales and document what each scale anchor means

  • Select and justify a control strategy from the treatment options (avoid, reduce, transfer, accept, exploit, share) for each high-priority risk

  • Design a hierarchy-of-controls argument for three risks, showing why a lower-order control was rejected

  • Distinguish detective, preventive, and corrective controls and place each in a control map

  • Identify control ownership, timing, and cost so treatment plans are actionable

Your checkpoint

A treatment plan covering the top eight risks, each with selected strategy, hierarchy-of-controls rationale, owner, due date, and expected residual rating

Week 4

Risk Treatment and Control & Governance, Frameworks, and Standards

  • Map the organization's risk framework against ISO 31000 principles, framework, and process clauses and note gaps

  • Explain how COSO ERM components connect to governance structures such as a board risk committee and a three-lines model

  • Define roles and responsibilities for risk ownership across the first, second, and third lines

  • Draft risk criteria and appetite statements that a governance body could actually approve

  • Compare at least two risk management standards or guidance documents and state where they diverge

Your checkpoint

A gap analysis table mapping at least 12 framework elements to current organizational practice, each with a gap rating and a recommended governance action, plus a one-paragraph board-ready risk appetite statement

Week 5

Risk Communication and Reporting & Monitoring, Review, and Continuous Improvement

  • Design a risk reporting pack for three audiences (board, executive, operational) with the right level of aggregation for each

  • Write risk statements and heat-map commentary that avoid vague language and state movement since the last period

  • Define key risk indicators with thresholds, data sources, and escalation triggers

  • Build a monitoring calendar that assigns review frequency by risk velocity and severity

  • Describe how to close the loop from monitoring findings into updated assessments and treatment plans

Your checkpoint

A two-page risk report for one audience, including a heat map with period-on-period movement, three key risk indicators with thresholds, and an escalation log with two sample triggers

Week 6

Monitoring, Review, and Continuous Improvement & Risk Management in Projects and Programs

  • Explain how project risk management differs from enterprise risk management in scope, horizon, and ownership

  • Build a project risk breakdown structure covering technical, schedule, cost, resource, and external categories

  • Apply qualitative screening and quantitative techniques such as expected monetary value and Monte Carlo logic to a project case

  • Integrate program-level and project-level risks, including escalation and aggregation of correlated risks

  • Design a lessons-learned and post-implementation review process that feeds continuous improvement

Your checkpoint

A project risk plan for a 12-month initiative with a risk breakdown structure, an expected monetary value calculation for the contingency reserve, and an escalation path to program level

Week 7

Emerging Risks and Organizational Resilience & Risk Management in Projects and Programs

  • Scan for emerging risks using horizon scanning, scenario planning, and weak-signal analysis, and record the method used

  • Assess at least three emerging risk themes such as cyber, climate, supply chain concentration, AI, or workforce change for organizational relevance

  • Define organizational resilience in terms of absorptive, adaptive, and restorative capacity and connect it to business continuity

  • Test a continuity plan against a plausible disruption scenario and identify single points of failure

  • Distinguish emerging risk from known risk and explain why standard registers underrepresent it

Your checkpoint

An emerging risk and resilience brief covering three themes with likelihood and impact rationale, one stress-test narrative, and five prioritized resilience actions

Week 8

Fundamentals of Risk Management and Risk Assessment & Risk Identification, Analysis, and Evaluation & Risk Treatment and Control & Risk Communication and Reporting & Monitoring, Review, and Continuous Improvement & Governance, Frameworks, and Standards & Risk Management in Projects and Programs & Emerging Risks and Organizational Resilience

  • Consolidate all eight domains into a single one-page concept map showing how they interlock

  • Complete two timed practice sets and analyze every error by domain and by failure type (knowledge gap, misread, or reasoning error)

  • Re-teach the three weakest sub-topics aloud or in writing without notes to confirm retention

  • Rehearse the calculation types (residual risk, expected monetary value, control effectiveness) under time pressure

  • Finalize an exam-day strategy covering question triage, time per item, and handling of ambiguous wording

Your checkpoint

A scored practice summary showing domain-by-domain accuracy, a list of the five weakest sub-topics with corrective notes, and a written exam-day timing plan

Milestones

Week 2: You can produce a cause-event-consequence risk statement for any scenario in under two minutes and defend its category and owner

Week 4: You can explain, without notes, how ISO 31000 and COSO ERM differ in emphasis and where each fits in a governance structure, and your appetite statement survives a challenge from a skeptical board member

Week 6: You can move a risk from project to program level correctly, compute expected monetary value for a contingency reserve, and justify the escalation decision

Week 8: Practice-set accuracy is at or above 75 percent overall with no domain below 60 percent, and every missed item has a written corrective note