CAMS-FCI flashcards
CAMS-FCI · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Predication
- The articulable facts - an alert, tip, referral, or self-identified issue - that justify opening an investigation. It distinguishes a documented investigation from speculation or personal suspicion.
- Standard of proof tiers
- Ascending thresholds from suspicion to reasonable grounds, balance of probabilities, and beyond reasonable doubt. The investigator states which tier the collected evidence supports in the report.
- Hypothesis-driven investigation
- Stating a testable proposition about the conduct, defining in advance what evidence would confirm or refute it, and testing both directions rather than only seeking confirmation.
- Three-lines model
- The business owns risk in the first line; compliance and investigations provide framework and oversight in the second; internal audit gives independent assurance in the third.
- Investigator independence
- Investigators must not examine matters in which they approved onboarding, the business decision, or the transaction under review. Conflicts are disclosed and recused.
- Mandate boundaries
- Investigators gather and analyze evidence; decisions to exit a relationship, file a SAR, or freeze activity rest with designated authority such as the MLRO or BSA officer.
- Residual risk
- The risk remaining after controls are applied. It is derived from inherent risk and control effectiveness, and it drives prioritization and monitoring intensity.
- Tipping rule for prioritization
- Ongoing activity that is still moving value out of the institution outranks closed historical matters of similar size because intervention can still prevent loss.
- Deprioritization rationale
- Documented reasoning for ranking a matter low, including the factors considered and approver. Undocumented low-risk closure is itself an audit finding.
- Triage decision options
- Close as false positive, close with enhanced monitoring, escalate to a full case, or refer to another function. Each option requires a documented reason code.
- False-positive documentation
- An explanation of why the alerted activity is consistent with the customer's known profile, income, and business, rather than a bare statement that the activity was expected.
- Investigation plan elements
- Scope, hypothesis, information needed, sources and systems, sequencing, resource estimate, target completion date, and escalation triggers, agreed before substantive evidence gathering begins.
- Case deduplication
- Checking for existing cases on the same subject, account, or network before opening a new case, so analysis is not fragmented across parallel files.
- Customer baseline
- Expected activity derived from the customer profile - income, business revenue, stated purpose, and history - against which deviations in volume, velocity, value, and counterparties are measured.
- Layering indicators
- Rapid pass-through, near-identical in and out amounts, multiple accounts or entities, structuring below thresholds, round-dollar transfers, and circular fund flows that obscure origin.
- Lowest intermediate balance
- A tracing method that estimates how much of a specific deposit remains in an account at a later date, accounting for withdrawals that may have consumed earlier funds.
- Structuring red flags
- Multiple deposits just under the reporting threshold, aggregated across days or weeks, or split across branches, tellers, or accounts of related parties to avoid reporting.
- Trade-based money laundering indicators
- Over- or under-invoicing, mismatched goods descriptions, phantom shipments, and repeated use of related-party trading companies in high-risk jurisdictions.
- Evidence capture standard
- Recording source system, query or report name, extraction date and time, extracting user, and record identifiers so that another investigator can regenerate the same data.
- Contemporaneous notes
- Notes made at the time of the work, dated and attributed, separating fact from opinion. Corrections are struck through and initialed rather than erased.
- Legal hold
- A directive suspending routine deletion of records relevant to an investigation or legal process, with documented scope, recipients, and effective date.
- Money laundering stages
- Placement of cash into the financial system, layering to obscure origin, and integration of funds back into the economy as apparently legitimate. Red flags differ by stage.
- Terrorist financing red flags
- Small-value transfers, misuse of charities or nonprofits, funnel accounts near conflict zones, and fund movement inconsistent with the stated purpose, often lawful in origin.
- Sanctions evasion indicators
- Use of intermediaries, re-documentation of goods, transshipment through third countries, and opaque ownership structures designed to conceal a designated party's involvement.
- Mule account indicators
- Rapid in and out movement, many small deposits from unrelated parties, and account activity inconsistent with the holder's profile, typical of fraud proceeds movement.
- Interview question funnel
- Starting with open questions, then narrowing to closed and clarifying questions while avoiding leading questions that suggest the answer the investigator wants.
- Tipping-off prohibition
- The rule that a subject must not be told a SAR has been filed or that an investigation exists, because disclosure could prejudice the investigation or alert other parties.
- Cross-border information sharing
- Sharing customer or case information across jurisdictions may require a mutual legal assistance treaty, a data-protection adequacy assessment, or regulator approval, with the legal basis documented.
- SAR narrative elements
- Who, what, when, where, how, and why: subject identifiers, conduct and typology, dates, accounts and jurisdictions, transaction pattern, and reasoning linking facts to suspicion.
- Continuing activity reporting
- When suspicious activity persists after an initial SAR, a supplemental or follow-up filing may be required, with the filing reference tracked in the case file.
- Remediation outcomes
- Documented actions following an investigation - exit, enhanced monitoring, CDD refresh, control fix, training, or referral - each with an owner and due date.
- Legal privilege in investigations
- Communications with counsel may be privileged. They are marked, distributed narrowly, and handled so that privilege is not inadvertently waived.