CAMS-FCI study plan
CAMS-FCI · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Investigations fundamentals, governance and the role of the financial crime investigator & Alert triage, case intake and investigation planning
Define the investigator's mandate, escalation authority and independence boundaries, and write a one-page role charter in your own words
Map the investigation lifecycle from alert generation through case closure, labeling each gate where a documented decision is required
Draft a triage decision tree that separates close-on-triage, request-for-information and full-case outcomes with the criteria for each
Build a 15-term glossary covering governance, accountability and case intake concepts, defining each term without copying source wording
Your checkpoint
A two-page investigation lifecycle map with decision gates, plus a completed triage decision tree you can apply to a sample alert
Transaction analysis and tracing of funds
Trace a constructed multi-hop funds flow through three intermediary accounts and record the value lost at each hop
Distinguish layering, integration and placement movements in a written narrative using at least five transaction types
Calculate the effect of structuring thresholds, round-amount patterns and rapid pass-through on a suspicion score
Practice writing a funds-flow summary that a non-specialist reader could follow without the underlying statements
Your checkpoint
A traced funds-flow diagram for a constructed 12-transaction scenario with a 400-word narrative memo explaining source, path and destination
Transaction analysis and tracing of funds & Typologies and red flags across financial crime threats
Match at least ten typologies to the transaction behaviours that evidence them, and note one false-positive pattern for each
Analyze a trade-based or invoice-based scenario for over- and under-invoicing, phantom shipment and carousel indicators
Compare typology indicators across cash-intensive, digital-payment and correspondent-banking channels
Identify which typology indicators survive scrutiny as standalone red flags versus which only matter in combination
Your checkpoint
A typology-to-evidence matrix covering ten typologies, each with confirming behaviours, weakening factors and a channel note
Typologies and red flags across financial crime threats & Risk assessment and investigation prioritization
Score three constructed customer profiles against a risk model you build from inherent, control and residual factors
Rank a queue of eight alerts by risk and explain each ranking decision in one sentence
Justify two prioritization decisions where the higher-value alert is correctly deprioritized for a stronger qualitative reason
Document the assumptions and limits of your risk model so a reviewer could challenge it
Your checkpoint
A completed risk-scoring worksheet for three profiles plus a ranked eight-alert queue with written rationale for every position
Evidence collection, documentation and case file management
Construct a case file index that satisfies evidential, regulatory and internal-audit needs simultaneously
Write a chronological investigation log for a constructed case, distinguishing fact, inference and open question
Apply a chain-of-custody and retention checklist to digital and documentary evidence, noting where handling errors create challengeable gaps
Draft a case summary that states findings, evidence relied on and unresolved gaps without overstating conclusions
Your checkpoint
A complete mock case file for one constructed matter: index, chronology, evidence register and two-page case summary
Alert triage, case intake and investigation planning & Interviewing, information sharing and collaboration with law enforcement
Convert a case file into an investigation plan with scope, hypotheses, evidence to obtain and a timeline
Prepare an interview outline that sequences open, funnel and challenge questions and pre-empts two likely evasions
Draft five questions that test a subject's account against the transaction record without disclosing investigative detail prematurely
Identify what may be shared with law enforcement, when, and through which channel, and note the confidentiality limits on each
Your checkpoint
An investigation plan plus a 15-question interview outline and a one-page information-sharing decision note for the same case
Suspicious activity reporting, escalation and remediation outcomes & Ethics, confidentiality and legal considerations in investigations
Draft a suspicious activity narrative that states who, what, when, where, how and why-suspicious in a defensible sequence
Revise the narrative to remove speculation, hedging and unsupported adjectives while retaining every material fact
Analyze three ethical dilemmas covering tipping-off risk, client confidentiality and internal pressure, and state the correct action with reasoning
Map the escalation path from investigator to reporting officer and identify the remediation outcomes that can follow a filing
Your checkpoint
A final suspicious activity narrative with a before-and-after revision note, plus a written ethics analysis of three dilemmas
Investigations fundamentals, governance and the role of the financial crime investigator & Risk assessment and investigation prioritization & Alert triage, case intake and investigation planning & Transaction analysis and tracing of funds & Evidence collection, documentation and case file management & Typologies and red flags across financial crime threats & Interviewing, information sharing and collaboration with law enforcement & Suspicious activity reporting, escalation and remediation outcomes & Ethics, confidentiality and legal considerations in investigations
Complete a timed 60-question mixed-domain practice set and record accuracy by domain
Re-teach your two weakest domains from memory in writing, then check the gaps against your notes
Reconstruct the investigation lifecycle, typology matrix and reporting chain from blank pages without reference
Consolidate a one-page personal error log listing recurring mistakes and the corrective rule for each
Your checkpoint
A scored practice-set report with per-domain accuracy, a written re-teach of the two weakest domains and a one-page error log
Milestones
Week 2: Trace a 12-transaction funds flow unaided and explain each hop's evidentiary significance without consulting notes
Week 4: Score three risk profiles and defend every ranking in a queue of eight alerts, including one deliberate deprioritization
Week 6: Produce a case file, investigation plan and interview outline that a reviewer could act on without asking what you meant
Week 8: Score at least 80 percent overall on the mixed practice set with no domain below 70 percent, and show the error log as evidence of corrected gaps