CHES study materials
CHES study resources

CHES study plan

CHES · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

Assessment of Needs and Capacity

  • Differentiate primary and secondary data sources and select appropriate ones for a defined community health scenario

  • Outline a needs assessment specifying at least three data collection methods (survey, focus group, key informant interview) matched to a stated population

  • Analyze quantitative and qualitative data to rank three priority health needs with supporting rationale

  • Identify individual, organizational, and community assets and capacity gaps that constrain program delivery

  • Explain how social determinants of health and equity data are incorporated into a capacity assessment

Your checkpoint

A one-page needs and capacity assessment outline for a hypothetical county asthma program: two primary and two secondary data sources, one collection method per source, three prioritized needs with justification, and a list of five community assets.

Week 2

Assessment of Needs and Capacity & Evaluation and Research

  • Distinguish process, impact, and outcome evaluation and match each level to a corresponding evaluation question

  • Select an appropriate quantitative or qualitative research design for a stated health education question

  • Interpret reported measures of association, confidence intervals, and statistical significance from a study abstract

  • Apply findings from a published needs assessment to revise a draft program plan

  • Describe sampling approaches and their implications for the generalizability of needs assessment and evaluation findings

Your checkpoint

A completed ten-item worksheet: five scenarios matched to the correct evaluation level and five scenarios matched to the correct research design, each with a two-sentence written rationale, scoring at least 8 of 10.

Week 3

Planning

  • Write measurable objectives that specify audience, behavior, condition, and degree of attainment

  • Align a set of objectives across cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning domains

  • Select a planning model (e.g., PRECEDE-PROCEED, generalized model, intervention mapping) and justify the choice for a given scenario

  • Design intervention activities that map directly to identified needs and available capacity

  • Construct a basic budget and timeline for a planned intervention

Your checkpoint

A one-page logic model linking two prioritized needs to three activities, three short-term objectives, and two outcome indicators, with a supporting budget line and 12-week timeline.

Week 4

Planning & Implementation

  • Sequence intervention activities into an implementation timeline with assigned responsible parties

  • Draft a full session outline or lesson plan for at least one intervention session, including materials and timing

  • Anticipate implementation facilitators and barriers and specify a mitigation for each barrier

  • Describe strategies for adapting implementation to diverse audiences, settings, and literacy levels

  • Specify the resources, training, and staffing required to launch the planned intervention

Your checkpoint

A five-page program plan packet: logic model, three measurable objectives, one complete session plan, implementation timeline with responsible parties, and a budget table with at least six line items.

Week 5

Evaluation and Research & Implementation

  • Match experimental, quasi-experimental, and non-experimental designs to program constraints and evaluation questions

  • Design data collection instruments and a sampling approach suitable for a small program evaluation

  • Specify analysis and reporting procedures for quantitative and qualitative evaluation data

  • Explain how process evaluation data are used to make mid-course adjustments during implementation

  • Apply ethical research principles, including informed consent and institutional review, to evaluation activities

Your checkpoint

A two-page evaluation plan for the Week 4 program: one evaluation question per level (process, impact, outcome), two draft data collection instruments, sampling method, analysis approach, and reporting format for stakeholders.

Week 6

Advocacy & Communication

  • Prepare a data-supported advocacy message tailored to a specific decision-maker audience

  • Identify stakeholders, coalition partners, and channels that advance a policy objective

  • Draft a policy brief or testimony that states the problem, presents evidence, makes a specific ask, and projects impact

  • Select communication channels and message framing appropriate to a target audience's needs and preferences

  • Revise a health education handout to meet plain-language and health literacy standards

Your checkpoint

A two-page policy brief with a data-supported ask, a three-minute testimony outline, and a rewritten one-page handout accompanied by a plain-language revision checklist showing at least six changes.

Week 7

Leadership and Management & Ethics and Professionalism

  • Distinguish leadership from management functions and apply both to a health education program scenario

  • Outline a staffing plan defining roles, responsibilities, and a supervision and feedback structure

  • Describe steps for recruiting, training, and retaining program staff and volunteers

  • Apply the health education code of ethics to scenarios involving confidentiality, conflicts of interest, and professional competence

  • Distinguish ethical dilemmas from legal requirements and describe a structured decision-making process for each

Your checkpoint

A written analysis of three ethics scenarios using the code of ethics as an explicit decision framework, plus a one-page staffing and management plan with an organization chart and three retention strategies.

Week 8

Collaboration & Assessment of Needs and Capacity & Planning & Implementation & Evaluation and Research & Advocacy & Communication & Leadership and Management & Ethics and Professionalism

  • Coordinate with interprofessional partners to define shared goals, roles, and decision-making procedures

  • Describe strategies for building, sustaining, and resolving conflict within coalitions and partnerships

  • Map every missed item from a full-length practice exam to its domain and sub-competency

  • Re-study and re-test the two weakest domains until accuracy improves

  • Assemble a consolidated one-page summary of key models, terms, and frameworks across all nine domains

Your checkpoint

A 100-question timed practice exam completed in one sitting, plus a one-page remediation plan listing the three weakest sub-competencies with dated re-review and re-test actions.

Milestones

Week 2: Needs assessment outline and evaluation/design worksheet both complete; worksheet scored at least 8 of 10 with rationales written for every item.

Week 4: Program plan packet submitted, and a 60-question timed practice exam completed with a score of at least 65% and an error log categorized by domain.

Week 6: Policy brief, testimony outline, and plain-language handout revision complete; evaluation plan from Week 5 reviewed against the program plan for internal consistency.

Week 8: Full-length 100-question practice exam completed with a score of at least 75%, every missed item mapped to a domain, and a dated remediation plan covering the three weakest sub-competencies.