CHES study plan
CHES · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Assessment of Needs and Capacity
Differentiate primary and secondary data sources and select appropriate ones for a defined community health scenario
Outline a needs assessment specifying at least three data collection methods (survey, focus group, key informant interview) matched to a stated population
Analyze quantitative and qualitative data to rank three priority health needs with supporting rationale
Identify individual, organizational, and community assets and capacity gaps that constrain program delivery
Explain how social determinants of health and equity data are incorporated into a capacity assessment
Your checkpoint
A one-page needs and capacity assessment outline for a hypothetical county asthma program: two primary and two secondary data sources, one collection method per source, three prioritized needs with justification, and a list of five community assets.
Assessment of Needs and Capacity & Evaluation and Research
Distinguish process, impact, and outcome evaluation and match each level to a corresponding evaluation question
Select an appropriate quantitative or qualitative research design for a stated health education question
Interpret reported measures of association, confidence intervals, and statistical significance from a study abstract
Apply findings from a published needs assessment to revise a draft program plan
Describe sampling approaches and their implications for the generalizability of needs assessment and evaluation findings
Your checkpoint
A completed ten-item worksheet: five scenarios matched to the correct evaluation level and five scenarios matched to the correct research design, each with a two-sentence written rationale, scoring at least 8 of 10.
Planning
Write measurable objectives that specify audience, behavior, condition, and degree of attainment
Align a set of objectives across cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning domains
Select a planning model (e.g., PRECEDE-PROCEED, generalized model, intervention mapping) and justify the choice for a given scenario
Design intervention activities that map directly to identified needs and available capacity
Construct a basic budget and timeline for a planned intervention
Your checkpoint
A one-page logic model linking two prioritized needs to three activities, three short-term objectives, and two outcome indicators, with a supporting budget line and 12-week timeline.
Planning & Implementation
Sequence intervention activities into an implementation timeline with assigned responsible parties
Draft a full session outline or lesson plan for at least one intervention session, including materials and timing
Anticipate implementation facilitators and barriers and specify a mitigation for each barrier
Describe strategies for adapting implementation to diverse audiences, settings, and literacy levels
Specify the resources, training, and staffing required to launch the planned intervention
Your checkpoint
A five-page program plan packet: logic model, three measurable objectives, one complete session plan, implementation timeline with responsible parties, and a budget table with at least six line items.
Evaluation and Research & Implementation
Match experimental, quasi-experimental, and non-experimental designs to program constraints and evaluation questions
Design data collection instruments and a sampling approach suitable for a small program evaluation
Specify analysis and reporting procedures for quantitative and qualitative evaluation data
Explain how process evaluation data are used to make mid-course adjustments during implementation
Apply ethical research principles, including informed consent and institutional review, to evaluation activities
Your checkpoint
A two-page evaluation plan for the Week 4 program: one evaluation question per level (process, impact, outcome), two draft data collection instruments, sampling method, analysis approach, and reporting format for stakeholders.
Advocacy & Communication
Prepare a data-supported advocacy message tailored to a specific decision-maker audience
Identify stakeholders, coalition partners, and channels that advance a policy objective
Draft a policy brief or testimony that states the problem, presents evidence, makes a specific ask, and projects impact
Select communication channels and message framing appropriate to a target audience's needs and preferences
Revise a health education handout to meet plain-language and health literacy standards
Your checkpoint
A two-page policy brief with a data-supported ask, a three-minute testimony outline, and a rewritten one-page handout accompanied by a plain-language revision checklist showing at least six changes.
Leadership and Management & Ethics and Professionalism
Distinguish leadership from management functions and apply both to a health education program scenario
Outline a staffing plan defining roles, responsibilities, and a supervision and feedback structure
Describe steps for recruiting, training, and retaining program staff and volunteers
Apply the health education code of ethics to scenarios involving confidentiality, conflicts of interest, and professional competence
Distinguish ethical dilemmas from legal requirements and describe a structured decision-making process for each
Your checkpoint
A written analysis of three ethics scenarios using the code of ethics as an explicit decision framework, plus a one-page staffing and management plan with an organization chart and three retention strategies.
Collaboration & Assessment of Needs and Capacity & Planning & Implementation & Evaluation and Research & Advocacy & Communication & Leadership and Management & Ethics and Professionalism
Coordinate with interprofessional partners to define shared goals, roles, and decision-making procedures
Describe strategies for building, sustaining, and resolving conflict within coalitions and partnerships
Map every missed item from a full-length practice exam to its domain and sub-competency
Re-study and re-test the two weakest domains until accuracy improves
Assemble a consolidated one-page summary of key models, terms, and frameworks across all nine domains
Your checkpoint
A 100-question timed practice exam completed in one sitting, plus a one-page remediation plan listing the three weakest sub-competencies with dated re-review and re-test actions.
Milestones
Week 2: Needs assessment outline and evaluation/design worksheet both complete; worksheet scored at least 8 of 10 with rationales written for every item.
Week 4: Program plan packet submitted, and a 60-question timed practice exam completed with a score of at least 65% and an error log categorized by domain.
Week 6: Policy brief, testimony outline, and plain-language handout revision complete; evaluation plan from Week 5 reviewed against the program plan for internal consistency.
Week 8: Full-length 100-question practice exam completed with a score of at least 75%, every missed item mapped to a domain, and a dated remediation plan covering the three weakest sub-competencies.