CHESP study materials
CHESP study resources

Wax Buildup and Slip Risk in a High-Traffic Corridor

CHESP · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Wax Buildup and Slip Risk in a High-Traffic Corridor

A 180-bed hospital's main corridor receives heavy foot and wheelchair traffic. Over three months, EVS has applied floor finish monthly to 'keep it shiny,' and the finish has built up to a visible thickness. Two patient falls have been reported in the corridor in six weeks; neither was witnessed, but both occurred near a slight slope where the floor looks glossy. The safety officer asks EVS to 'strip and rewax the whole corridor this weekend' to fix the shine. The EVS manager notes that stripping is labor-intensive, requires closing the corridor, and that the last strip used a high-alkaline stripper that damaged a baseboard. Housekeeping also reports the corridor is mopped with a wet mop that leaves standing water near the slope.

1. Is 'strip and rewax the whole corridor' the right first response to the fall reports? What should the manager do first?

Read the worked answer

No - stripping and rewaxing is a cosmetic fix that may not address the fall cause, and it carries its own risks.

What the manager should do first:

  1. Investigate the falls - review incident reports, interview staff, and inspect the slope area for standing water, finish buildup, and slip resistance. Two falls in six weeks near the same feature is a signal, not a coincidence.
  2. Check the mopping method - a wet mop leaving standing water near a slope is a direct slip hazard. Fix the method (damp mop, correct solution, dry before reopening) before spending a weekend on stripping.
  3. Assess finish buildup - excessive finish can reduce slip resistance and cause a glossy, slick surface. If buildup is confirmed, spot-strip and recoat the affected area rather than stripping the entire corridor.
  4. Coordinate with the safety officer - the goal is fall prevention, not shine. Align on measurable criteria (slip-resistance testing, standing-water checks).

Stripping the whole corridor this weekend is disproportionate, disruptive, and may not fix the actual hazard.

2. If the manager decides some stripping is warranted, how should the work be scoped, sequenced, and communicated to protect patients and staff?

Read the worked answer

Scope the work to the hazard, not the whole corridor.

Scoping:

  • Strip and recoat only the slope area and any sections with confirmed finish buildup; leave the rest of the corridor on a normal maintenance cycle.
  • Choose a stripper compatible with the baseboard and flooring; the prior high-alkaline product damaged the baseboard, so select a gentler product or protect the baseboard.

Sequencing:

  • Schedule during low-traffic hours; close only the affected section, not the entire corridor.
  • Post clear signage and barricades; provide an alternate route for wheelchairs and stretchers.
  • Allow full dry time before reopening; do not reopen while finish is tacky.

Communication:

  • Notify nursing, transport, and the safety officer of the closure window and alternate route.
  • Brief housekeepers on the corrected damp-mop method and standing-water checks.
  • Document the scope, products, dry times, and reopening time.

Follow-up:

  • Re-inspect the slope area after the work; monitor for new falls; review the incident data at 30 and 90 days to confirm the fix worked.