CIPM Level I study materials
CIPM Level I study resources

CIPM Level I study plan

CIPM Level I · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 6 hours per week

Week 1

Performance measurement and attribution (conceptual foundations; level weighted more heavily on performance measurement and attribution)

  • Define the three CIPM Levels' scope and map each of the three exam domains to its topic list, noting that Domain 1 is weighted most heavily and must anchor the schedule

  • Distinguish time-weighted from money-weighted returns by deriving both on a three-period cash-flow example and stating when each is the correct measure for manager evaluation

  • Compute simple, cumulative, and annualized (geometric) returns from a monthly return series and explain why arithmetic averaging overstates multi-period performance

  • Build a one-page formula sheet covering holding-period return, geometric linking, and the cash-flow timing assumptions behind each

Your checkpoint

A completed formula sheet plus a worked three-period example showing TWR and MWR side by side with a written justification of which measure answers which question

Week 2

Performance measurement and attribution (conceptual foundations; level weighted more heavily on performance measurement and attribution)

  • Calculate the effects of external cash flows on a portfolio using the original Dietz, modified Dietz, and daily-valuation true time-weighted methods

  • Identify the conditions under which modified Dietz produces materially biased results and state the industry threshold that triggers revaluation

  • Derive portfolio return as a weighted average of segment returns and explain the interaction between asset weighting and segment performance

  • Solve at least ten cash-flow timing problems by hand without reference to notes

Your checkpoint

A worked problem set of ten cash-flow and return-calculation exercises with full solutions and a short note on method selection

Week 3

Performance measurement and attribution (conceptual foundations; level weighted more heavily on performance measurement and attribution)

  • Explain the purpose and mechanics of attribution analysis, contrasting Brinson-Fachler and Brinson-Hood-Beebower allocation and selection effects

  • Compute allocation, selection, and interaction effects for a two-sector, two-period example and reconcile the total to the active return

  • Distinguish arithmetic from geometric attribution and describe the residual (compounding) problem in arithmetic attribution

  • Interpret a sector-level attribution table to state whether active return came from allocation or selection decisions

Your checkpoint

A two-sector attribution spreadsheet or handwritten table showing allocation, selection, interaction, and total active return that reconciles to the arithmetic difference between portfolio and benchmark returns

Week 4

Performance measurement and attribution (conceptual foundations; level weighted more heavily on performance measurement and attribution) & Performance appraisal

  • Apply the CIPM ethics and professional standards framework to performance-measurement scenarios, identifying misrepresentation and conflict-of-interest issues

  • Define the risk measures used alongside return: standard deviation, beta, tracking error, information ratio, Sharpe ratio, and Treynor ratio

  • Compute Sharpe, Treynor, information ratio, and M-squared for a given return and risk input set and state the decision each supports

  • Explain the limitations of each risk-adjusted measure, including the effect of non-normal returns and benchmark choice

Your checkpoint

A risk-adjusted performance comparison of three hypothetical portfolios with a written recommendation and stated caveats

Week 5

Performance appraisal

  • Distinguish the manager universe, market index, and custom benchmark approaches and state the validity criteria for each

  • Evaluate a benchmark against the properties of measurability, appropriateness, and representativeness, and identify common benchmark misspecification errors

  • Describe the steps in a manager selection process, from universe construction through screening, qualitative review, and final selection

  • Explain survivorship, look-ahead, and style-drift biases in manager universes and how each distorts appraisal conclusions

Your checkpoint

A written benchmark-critique memo assessing two candidate benchmarks for a stated mandate and recommending one with justification

Week 6

Performance appraisal

  • Apply the manager continuation and termination decision framework, including the role of the investment policy statement and the distinction between skill and luck

  • Interpret performance persistence evidence and explain why past outperformance is a weak predictor of future results

  • Explain style analysis and returns-based style analysis, and describe how style drift is detected

  • Construct a manager scorecard combining quantitative metrics with qualitative factors and state the weighting rationale

Your checkpoint

A completed manager scorecard for two hypothetical managers with a hire, monitor, or terminate recommendation and documented reasoning

Week 7

Performance presentation, including the GIPS® standards

  • Outline the structure of the GIPS standards: the provisions framework, the role of the CFA Institute, and the distinction between requirements and recommendations

  • Apply the core GIPS requirements for input data, calculation methodology, composite construction, and disclosure to a firm-level scenario

  • Identify common GIPS compliance errors, including improper composite inclusion, missing disclosures, and misstated fee treatment

  • Distinguish gross-of-fees from net-of-fees returns and state the required treatment of withholding taxes and trading costs

Your checkpoint

A GIPS compliance checklist applied to a hypothetical firm's performance presentation, flagging at least five deficiencies with the governing provision cited

Week 8

Performance measurement and attribution (conceptual foundations; level weighted more heavily on performance measurement and attribution) & Performance appraisal & Performance presentation, including the GIPS® standards

  • Complete two full-length timed practice exams under exam conditions and record per-domain accuracy

  • Review every missed item and classify each error as knowledge gap, calculation slip, or misread question

  • Re-derive the ten most error-prone formulas from memory and confirm against the week 1 formula sheet

  • Consolidate a one-page cross-domain summary linking measurement, appraisal, and presentation decisions

Your checkpoint

A timed practice-exam score report with per-domain accuracy above 70 percent and a prioritized list of remaining weak areas

Milestones

Week 2: Can compute time-weighted and money-weighted returns and modified Dietz from raw cash-flow data without notes, scoring at least 8 of 10 on a self-made problem set

Week 4: Can reconcile a full attribution table to active return and compute all five risk-adjusted ratios, scoring at least 75 percent on a mixed Domain 1 practice set

Week 6: Can defend a benchmark choice against the validity criteria and justify a manager continuation decision in writing, scoring at least 75 percent on a Domain 2 practice set

Week 8: Two timed practice exams completed with overall accuracy at or above 70 percent and no single domain below 65 percent