CIPM Level I study plan
CIPM Level I · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Performance measurement and attribution (conceptual foundations; level weighted more heavily on performance measurement and attribution)
Define the three CIPM Levels' scope and map each of the three exam domains to its topic list, noting that Domain 1 is weighted most heavily and must anchor the schedule
Distinguish time-weighted from money-weighted returns by deriving both on a three-period cash-flow example and stating when each is the correct measure for manager evaluation
Compute simple, cumulative, and annualized (geometric) returns from a monthly return series and explain why arithmetic averaging overstates multi-period performance
Build a one-page formula sheet covering holding-period return, geometric linking, and the cash-flow timing assumptions behind each
Your checkpoint
A completed formula sheet plus a worked three-period example showing TWR and MWR side by side with a written justification of which measure answers which question
Performance measurement and attribution (conceptual foundations; level weighted more heavily on performance measurement and attribution)
Calculate the effects of external cash flows on a portfolio using the original Dietz, modified Dietz, and daily-valuation true time-weighted methods
Identify the conditions under which modified Dietz produces materially biased results and state the industry threshold that triggers revaluation
Derive portfolio return as a weighted average of segment returns and explain the interaction between asset weighting and segment performance
Solve at least ten cash-flow timing problems by hand without reference to notes
Your checkpoint
A worked problem set of ten cash-flow and return-calculation exercises with full solutions and a short note on method selection
Performance measurement and attribution (conceptual foundations; level weighted more heavily on performance measurement and attribution)
Explain the purpose and mechanics of attribution analysis, contrasting Brinson-Fachler and Brinson-Hood-Beebower allocation and selection effects
Compute allocation, selection, and interaction effects for a two-sector, two-period example and reconcile the total to the active return
Distinguish arithmetic from geometric attribution and describe the residual (compounding) problem in arithmetic attribution
Interpret a sector-level attribution table to state whether active return came from allocation or selection decisions
Your checkpoint
A two-sector attribution spreadsheet or handwritten table showing allocation, selection, interaction, and total active return that reconciles to the arithmetic difference between portfolio and benchmark returns
Performance measurement and attribution (conceptual foundations; level weighted more heavily on performance measurement and attribution) & Performance appraisal
Apply the CIPM ethics and professional standards framework to performance-measurement scenarios, identifying misrepresentation and conflict-of-interest issues
Define the risk measures used alongside return: standard deviation, beta, tracking error, information ratio, Sharpe ratio, and Treynor ratio
Compute Sharpe, Treynor, information ratio, and M-squared for a given return and risk input set and state the decision each supports
Explain the limitations of each risk-adjusted measure, including the effect of non-normal returns and benchmark choice
Your checkpoint
A risk-adjusted performance comparison of three hypothetical portfolios with a written recommendation and stated caveats
Performance appraisal
Distinguish the manager universe, market index, and custom benchmark approaches and state the validity criteria for each
Evaluate a benchmark against the properties of measurability, appropriateness, and representativeness, and identify common benchmark misspecification errors
Describe the steps in a manager selection process, from universe construction through screening, qualitative review, and final selection
Explain survivorship, look-ahead, and style-drift biases in manager universes and how each distorts appraisal conclusions
Your checkpoint
A written benchmark-critique memo assessing two candidate benchmarks for a stated mandate and recommending one with justification
Performance appraisal
Apply the manager continuation and termination decision framework, including the role of the investment policy statement and the distinction between skill and luck
Interpret performance persistence evidence and explain why past outperformance is a weak predictor of future results
Explain style analysis and returns-based style analysis, and describe how style drift is detected
Construct a manager scorecard combining quantitative metrics with qualitative factors and state the weighting rationale
Your checkpoint
A completed manager scorecard for two hypothetical managers with a hire, monitor, or terminate recommendation and documented reasoning
Performance presentation, including the GIPS® standards
Outline the structure of the GIPS standards: the provisions framework, the role of the CFA Institute, and the distinction between requirements and recommendations
Apply the core GIPS requirements for input data, calculation methodology, composite construction, and disclosure to a firm-level scenario
Identify common GIPS compliance errors, including improper composite inclusion, missing disclosures, and misstated fee treatment
Distinguish gross-of-fees from net-of-fees returns and state the required treatment of withholding taxes and trading costs
Your checkpoint
A GIPS compliance checklist applied to a hypothetical firm's performance presentation, flagging at least five deficiencies with the governing provision cited
Performance measurement and attribution (conceptual foundations; level weighted more heavily on performance measurement and attribution) & Performance appraisal & Performance presentation, including the GIPS® standards
Complete two full-length timed practice exams under exam conditions and record per-domain accuracy
Review every missed item and classify each error as knowledge gap, calculation slip, or misread question
Re-derive the ten most error-prone formulas from memory and confirm against the week 1 formula sheet
Consolidate a one-page cross-domain summary linking measurement, appraisal, and presentation decisions
Your checkpoint
A timed practice-exam score report with per-domain accuracy above 70 percent and a prioritized list of remaining weak areas
Milestones
Week 2: Can compute time-weighted and money-weighted returns and modified Dietz from raw cash-flow data without notes, scoring at least 8 of 10 on a self-made problem set
Week 4: Can reconcile a full attribution table to active return and compute all five risk-adjusted ratios, scoring at least 75 percent on a mixed Domain 1 practice set
Week 6: Can defend a benchmark choice against the validity criteria and justify a manager continuation decision in writing, scoring at least 75 percent on a Domain 2 practice set
Week 8: Two timed practice exams completed with overall accuracy at or above 70 percent and no single domain below 65 percent