CISI Operational Risk study materials
CISI Operational Risk study resources

CISI Operational Risk cheat sheet

CISI Operational Risk · Keep the key ideas within reach.

Quick reference

Introduction to Operational Risk

  • Operational risk: risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, systems, or from external events (Basel II definition).

  • Four causal categories: people, process, systems, external events. Legal risk is included; strategic and reputational risk are excluded from the Basel capital definition.

  • Operational risk is inherent in all activities; unlike market or credit risk, it is not taken for profit and cannot be eliminated, only managed.

  • Operational loss events often have low frequency/high severity (e.g. fraud, disasters) or high frequency/low severity (e.g. processing errors).

  • Operational risk is typically measured using loss data, risk and control self-assessments (RCSAs), key risk indicators (KRIs), and scenario analysis.

  • The 'three lines of defence' model: business units own risk (1st), risk/compliance functions oversee (2nd), internal audit provides independent assurance (3rd).

  • Operational risk management aims to protect earnings volatility, capital, reputation, and regulatory compliance, not to maximise returns.

Quick reference

Operational Risk in the Context of Enterprise Risk Management

  • ERM integrates operational, credit, market, liquidity, strategic, and reputational risk into a single firm-wide framework aligned with strategy.

  • Operational risk interacts with other risks: e.g. a credit loss may arise from a processing error (operational) or a market loss from a failed trade settlement.

  • Risk appetite statement expresses the amount of risk the firm is willing to accept in pursuit of objectives; risk tolerance sets operational boundaries.

  • Risk taxonomy provides a common language to categorise risks and map them to controls, owners, and capital.

  • The risk universe lists all identified risks; risk registers record assessed risks, controls, and owners at business-unit level.

  • ERM uses a 'risk-adjusted' view: economic capital allocation, risk-adjusted return on capital (RAROC), and stress testing inform decisions.

  • Governance: board sets appetite, senior management implements, risk committee oversees; independent risk function reports to the board or CRO.

Quick reference

The Regulatory Framework and Capital Requirements for Operational Risk

  • Basel II (2004) introduced an explicit operational risk capital charge under Pillar 1, alongside credit and market risk.

  • Three approaches: Basic Indicator Approach (BIA) = 15% of average annual gross income over three years; Standardised Approach (TSA) uses business-line betas (12–18%); Advanced Measurement Approach (AMA) uses internal models.

  • Basel III (post-2010) retained operational risk capital; the Basel Committee's 2017 finalisation replaced all approaches with the Standardised Approach (SA), effective from 2023.

  • SA formula: Business Indicator (BI) component × marginal coefficients (12%, 15%, 18%) applied to BI ranges, plus a loss component based on 10-year average annual operational losses.

  • Loss component = 15 × average annual operational losses over 10 years (capped at 100% of the BI component).

  • Business Indicator = interest income/expense, services income, and financial income/expense, calculated per prescribed rules.

  • Pillar 2 (ICAAP/SREP) requires firms to assess operational risk capital adequacy beyond Pillar 1; Pillar 3 requires public disclosure of operational risk.

  • Other regulators: FCA/PRA in UK (SYSC, operational resilience rules), EBA in EU (CRR/CRD), and local conduct regulators impose additional requirements.

Quick reference

Operational Risk Identification, Assessment and Measurement

  • Risk identification techniques: process mapping, workshops, scenario analysis, loss data analysis, internal audit findings, and external event databases.

  • RCSA: business units identify risks and controls, assess likelihood and impact (often 1–5 scales), and rate inherent and residual risk.

  • Risk rating = likelihood × impact; heat maps plot risks by these dimensions to prioritise attention.

  • KRIs are metrics that provide early warning of increasing risk (e.g. number of failed trades, staff turnover); thresholds trigger escalation.

  • Loss data: internal loss data (actual events), external data (consortium databases), and near-misses (events that did not cause loss but could have).

  • Scenario analysis: experts estimate frequency and severity of plausible severe events to supplement sparse loss data, feeding capital models.

  • Measurement approaches: historical loss simulation, scenario-based, scorecard, and causal models; AMA required rigorous data and validation.

  • Stress testing and reverse stress testing test resilience to extreme operational events (e.g. cyber attack, system outage).

Quick reference

Operational Risk Appetite, Tolerance and Governance

  • Risk appetite: the level of risk the firm is willing to accept to achieve its strategic objectives; expressed qualitatively and quantitatively.

  • Risk tolerance: the maximum acceptable deviation from appetite; breaches trigger escalation and remediation.

  • Risk appetite framework includes statements, metrics (KRIs), thresholds, governance, and reporting to the board.

  • Board approves risk appetite; the risk committee monitors; the CRO implements; business lines operate within limits.

  • Three lines of defence: 1st line owns and manages risk; 2nd line (risk/compliance) sets frameworks and challenges; 3rd line (internal audit) provides independent assurance.

  • Governance structures: board risk committee, audit committee, executive risk committee, and operational risk function.

  • Escalation protocols: defined triggers (e.g. KRI breach, loss above threshold) require reporting to senior management and board within set timeframes.

  • Culture and conduct: tone from the top, whistleblowing, and accountability reinforce risk appetite adherence.

Quick reference

Operational Risk Events, Loss Data and Incident Management

  • Operational loss event: an event causing financial loss, regulatory impact, or reputational harm due to failed processes, people, systems, or external events.

  • Event categories (Basel): internal fraud, external fraud, employment practices and workplace safety, clients/products/business practices, damage to physical assets, business disruption and system failures, execution/delivery/process management.

  • Loss data collection: capture event date, discovery date, amount, business line, event type, causes, and recoveries.

  • Near-miss: an event that did not result in loss but could have; recording near-misses improves risk identification.

  • Incident management: log, classify, escalate, investigate, remediate, and report incidents; root cause analysis prevents recurrence.

  • Loss data thresholds: firms set minimum loss amounts for capture (e.g. £10,000) to balance completeness and cost.

  • External loss data (e.g. ORX) supplements internal data for tail events and scenario calibration.

  • Regulatory reporting: material incidents may require notification to regulators (e.g. FCA/PRA) within specified timeframes.

Quick reference

Control Frameworks, Key Controls and Control Testing

  • Control: any action, policy, or procedure that reduces the likelihood or impact of a risk event.

  • Preventive controls stop an event occurring (e.g. segregation of duties, access controls); detective controls identify events after they occur (e.g. reconciliations, exception reports).

  • Key control: a control critical to managing a significant risk; its failure would materially increase risk.

  • Control testing: assess design effectiveness (is the control designed to mitigate the risk?) and operating effectiveness (is it working as intended?).

  • Testing methods: walkthroughs, sample testing, reperformance, observation, and data analytics.

  • Control rating: effective, partially effective, ineffective; failures require remediation plans with owners and deadlines.

  • COSO framework: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, monitoring activities.

  • Segregation of duties, maker-checker, and four-eyes principles are fundamental preventive controls in operations.

Quick reference

Operational Risk Mitigation and Transfer, Including Insurance

  • Risk mitigation reduces likelihood or impact through controls, process redesign, diversification, or contingency planning.

  • Risk transfer shifts financial consequences to a third party, typically via insurance, outsourcing, or hedging (though operational risk cannot be fully hedged).

  • Insurance: covers specific perils (e.g. fraud, professional indemnity, cyber, property); policies have deductibles, limits, exclusions, and waiting periods.

  • Insurance mitigation in capital: under Basel II AMA, insurance may reduce operational risk capital by up to 20% subject to conditions (e.g. insurer rating, policy term, payout certainty).

  • Captive insurance: a subsidiary insurer owned by the firm to retain and manage risk; may reduce external premiums but retains risk within the group.

  • Outsourcing transfers activities but not ultimate responsibility; the firm remains accountable to regulators for outsourced functions.

  • Business continuity and disaster recovery are mitigation measures for business disruption events.

  • Residual risk after mitigation must be assessed and monitored; mitigation should be proportionate to the risk.

Quick reference

Business Continuity, Resilience and Crisis Management

  • Business continuity management (BCM): capability to continue critical operations during and after disruption.

  • Business impact analysis (BIA): identifies critical processes, dependencies, and maximum tolerable downtime (MTD) / recovery time objectives (RTO).

  • Recovery point objective (RPO): maximum acceptable data loss measured in time; recovery time objective (RTO): target time to restore service.

  • Disaster recovery (DR): technical recovery of IT systems and data, often via backup sites or cloud failover.

  • Operational resilience: the ability of the firm to prevent, adapt, respond to, recover from, and learn from operational disruptions (FCA/PRA approach).

  • Crisis management: command and control structure, communication plans, and escalation during a severe incident.

  • Testing: regular exercises (tabletop, simulation, full failover) validate BCP and DR plans; lessons learned feed improvements.

  • Third-party dependencies (e.g. cloud providers) must be mapped and tested for resilience; concentration risk considered.

Quick reference

Conduct Risk, Outsourcing and Third-Party Risk

  • Conduct risk: risk that the firm's behaviour causes harm to customers, markets, or the firm's integrity (e.g. mis-selling, market abuse).

  • FCA conduct principles: treat customers fairly, act with integrity, due skill and care, communicate clearly, and manage conflicts of interest.

  • Conduct risk is managed through culture, incentives, training, monitoring, and complaint handling.

  • Outsourcing: transfer of a function to a third party; the firm retains regulatory responsibility and must manage the relationship.

  • Third-party risk management lifecycle: due diligence, contracting, onboarding, ongoing monitoring, and exit planning.

  • Concentration risk: over-reliance on a single third party (e.g. cloud provider) can threaten operational resilience.

  • Regulatory requirements: FCA SYSC 8 (outsourcing), EBA outsourcing guidelines, and PRA operational resilience rules require mapping of important business services.

  • Contract terms should include service levels, audit rights, data protection, termination, and subcontracting controls.