CLRE key terms
CLRE · Get comfortable with the vocabulary.
- Enabling statute
- Related: Notice-and-comment rulemaking, Preemption
A law that creates an agency and grants it authority to regulate a subject, including powers to issue rules, investigate, and enforce. It sets the outer boundary of lawful agency action.
- Notice-and-comment rulemaking
- Related: Enabling statute, Interpretive rule
A process under the Administrative Procedure Act where an agency publishes a proposed rule, accepts public comments, and issues a final rule with a reasoned response to significant comments.
- Interpretive rule
- Related: Notice-and-comment rulemaking, Plain meaning rule
An agency statement explaining how it understands a statute or regulation, without creating new legal obligations. It generally does not require notice-and-comment but receives less deference than a legislative rule.
- Administrative law judge (ALJ)
- Related: Exhaustion of administrative remedies
An official within an agency who presides over adversarial administrative proceedings, takes evidence, and issues an initial decision subject to agency review and later judicial review.
- Exhaustion of administrative remedies
- Related: Administrative law judge (ALJ)
The requirement that a party pursue available agency review or appeal procedures before seeking court intervention. Courts may dismiss claims filed prematurely while agency processes remain unfinished.
- Preemption
- Related: Enabling statute, Severability
The legal principle that federal law displaces conflicting state law, either expressly, by occupying an entire field, or when compliance with both is impossible. It limits state regulation of the same conduct.
- Plain meaning rule
- Related: Legislative history, Ejusdem generis
A statutory interpretation approach that gives effect to the ordinary meaning of the enacted text unless the result is absurd or ambiguous. Courts look to dictionary definitions and context rather than speculation.
- Legislative history
- Related: Plain meaning rule
The record of a law's development, including committee reports, floor debates, and drafts. It can clarify ambiguous statutory text but typically cannot override clear language.
- Safe harbor
- Related: Interpretive rule
A legal provision that shields specified conduct from liability or penalty if prescribed conditions are met. It provides certainty by defining a compliance path instead of relying on general standards.
- Ejusdem generis
- Related: Expressio unius est exclusio alterius, Plain meaning rule
A canon of construction holding that general words following a list of specific items are limited to things of the same kind. It prevents broad readings that would swallow the specific examples.
- Expressio unius est exclusio alterius
- Related: Ejusdem generis
A canon meaning that mentioning one thing implies exclusion of others. It is used cautiously because it can produce unintended results when a statute is not exhaustive.
- Severability
- Related: Preemption
A doctrine allowing a court to strike an invalid portion of a law while preserving the remainder, if the legislature would have enacted the valid parts alone. It limits the impact of partial invalidity.
- Three lines model
- Related: Compliance charter, Control environment
A governance framework separating management (first line), risk and compliance oversight (second line), and independent internal audit (third line). It clarifies accountability and reduces gaps in risk management.
- Tone at the top
- Related: Control environment, Three lines model
The signals senior leaders send through words and actions about ethics, compliance, and risk. It shapes whether employees perceive rules as genuine priorities or mere formalities.
- Compliance charter
- Related: Three lines model, Tone at the top
A formal document defining a compliance function's mandate, authority, independence, and reporting lines. It establishes the scope of responsibilities and the resources expected to fulfill them.
- Control environment
- Related: Tone at the top, Segregation of duties
The set of governance, ethical values, and management practices that set the tone for internal control. It includes integrity, commitment to competence, board oversight, and organizational structure.
- Segregation of duties
- Related: Preventive control, Control environment
An internal control principle assigning conflicting tasks, such as authorization, custody, and recordkeeping, to different people. It reduces the risk of error or fraud going undetected.
- Preventive control
- Related: Detective control, Segregation of duties
A control designed to stop an error, fraud, or policy violation before it happens. Examples include approvals, access restrictions, training, and system edits that block invalid transactions.
- Detective control
- Related: Preventive control, Control testing
A control intended to identify problems after they occur so management can correct them. Examples include reconciliations, exception reports, audits, and monitoring reviews.
- Risk appetite
- Related: Inherent risk, Residual risk
The amount and type of risk an organization is willing to accept in pursuit of its objectives. It guides decisions about which risks to avoid, mitigate, transfer, or retain.
- Inherent risk
- Related: Residual risk, Risk appetite
The level of risk before considering any controls or mitigation. It reflects the nature and context of an activity and helps prioritize where controls are most needed.
- Residual risk
- Related: Inherent risk, Control testing
The risk remaining after existing controls and mitigation have been applied and assessed. It is compared with risk appetite to decide whether additional action is necessary.
- Key risk indicator (KRI)
- Related: Residual risk, Control testing
A measure that provides early warning of increasing risk exposure or weakening controls. Effective KRIs are tied to specific risks, have thresholds, and trigger management action.
- Control testing
- Related: Walkthrough, Residual risk
A procedure to evaluate whether a control is designed appropriately and operates as intended. It may involve inquiry, observation, inspection, or re-performance and supports conclusions about control effectiveness.
- Walkthrough
- Related: Control testing, Root cause analysis
A process of tracing a transaction or activity from start to finish to understand the workflow and confirm which controls exist. It is often used to design testing or assess control gaps.
- Root cause analysis
- Related: Remediation plan, Control testing
A structured method to determine the underlying reason a problem occurred, not just its symptoms. It helps design remediation that prevents recurrence rather than treating the immediate instance.
- Internal investigation
- Related: Upjohn warning, Litigation hold, Chain of custody
A structured inquiry by an organization into alleged misconduct, policy violations, or legal risk. It aims to establish facts, preserve evidence, and support appropriate corrective or disciplinary action.
- Upjohn warning
- Related: Internal investigation, Attorney-client privilege
A notification given by counsel to employees during a corporate investigation explaining that the lawyer represents the company, not the employee, and that conversations may be shared with the company.
- Litigation hold
- Related: Records retention schedule, Chain of custody, Internal investigation
A directive to preserve documents and electronically stored information relevant to reasonably anticipated litigation, investigation, or regulatory proceeding. It suspends routine destruction until the matter is resolved.
- Chain of custody
- Related: Internal investigation, Litigation hold
A documented record of who collected, handled, and transferred evidence, and when. It preserves integrity and helps authenticate evidence in investigations or proceedings.
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- Related: Remediation plan, Internal investigation
A company's decision to report its own misconduct to authorities before an investigation is initiated. It may reduce penalties, but eligibility and credit depend on specific program requirements.
- Remediation plan
- Related: Root cause analysis, Voluntary self-disclosure
A documented set of actions to fix a compliance deficiency, including owners, deadlines, and evidence of completion. It addresses root causes and aims to prevent recurrence.
- Attorney-client privilege
- Related: Work product doctrine, Upjohn warning
A legal protection for confidential communications between a lawyer and client made to obtain legal advice. It can be waived by disclosure and does not cover business advice or underlying facts.
- Work product doctrine
- Related: Attorney-client privilege, Litigation hold
A protection for materials a lawyer prepares in anticipation of litigation, including witness interviews and legal analyses. It is broader than privilege but can be overcome by substantial need.
- Material nonpublic information (MNPI)
- Related: Confidential supervisory information (CSI), Professional skepticism
Information that could affect an investor's decision and is not generally available to the market. Trading or tipping on it can violate insider trading laws and firm policies.
- Records retention schedule
- Related: Litigation hold, Confidential supervisory information (CSI)
A policy listing record types, retention periods, and destruction methods. It ensures legal, regulatory, and operational needs are met while supporting consistent lifecycle management.
- Confidential supervisory information (CSI)
- Related: Records retention schedule, Material nonpublic information (MNPI)
Nonpublic information created or obtained by a financial supervisory agency during examination or supervision. Its disclosure is restricted by regulation and typically requires agency approval.
- Professional skepticism
- Related: Root cause analysis, Internal investigation
An attitude of questioning and critical assessment of evidence, assumptions, and representations. It helps compliance and audit professionals avoid overreliance on management assertions.
- Whistleblower protection
- Related: Internal investigation, Professional skepticism
Legal safeguards that prohibit retaliation against individuals who report suspected wrongdoing in good faith. They encourage reporting but may not shield knowingly false or malicious allegations.