The Jurat That Wasn't
Marcus is a Colorado notary working at a hospital. A patient, Rosa, has a form titled Affidavit of Treating Physician that will support her disability leave. The form's only notarial block is an acknowledgment: Acknowledged before me on ____ by Rosa Garcia. Rosa's nurse explains that Rosa must swear under oath that the statements in the affidavit are true. Marcus asks Rosa to raise her right hand, administers an oath, and then writes on the acknowledgment line: Sworn to and acknowledged before me. He signs, stamps with his compliant stamp, and writes the date. He does not add a venue or the words subscribed and sworn to before me. The hospital later rejects the form because the certificate is ambiguous. Marcus says the oath was administered, so the notarization should be valid.
1. What notarial act did the form require, and was Marcus's certificate adequate? Explain the difference between an acknowledgment and a jurat.
Read the worked answer
The form required a verification on oath or affirmation, commonly called a jurat, because Rosa was swearing that the affidavit's statements were true. An acknowledgment is different: the signer acknowledges that she signed voluntarily for the purposes stated, but does not swear to the truth of the contents. Marcus administered an oath, which is the core of a jurat, but his certificate is a hybrid. A proper jurat should identify the state and county, state that the affidavit was subscribed and sworn to before him on a date, name the signer, and be signed and stamped by the notary with the commission expiration. Writing 'Sworn to and acknowledged' mixes two acts and leaves out the venue and the subscribed and sworn language. The hospital is right to question it; the oath alone does not make the certificate self-proving.
2. How should Marcus correct the situation without committing a new error?
Read the worked answer
Marcus should not try to convert the existing acknowledgment into a jurat by adding words after the fact, especially after the document has left his control. The clean correction is for Rosa to appear again, sign a fresh affidavit or a new copy, and receive a proper jurat from Marcus or another notary. If the error is purely clerical and the original is still in his presence, he may prepare a corrected certificate that accurately states what happened, but he must not change the date to make the act appear earlier and must not notarize an affidavit he did not actually witness. If a new oath is administered, the new date and new certificate should reflect that. The hospital should be told what happened rather than receiving a silent alteration.
3. What should Marcus record in his journal for this act?
Read the worked answer
The journal should record the date and time, the type of act as a verification on oath or affirmation, Rosa's full name and address, a description of the affidavit, the fee charged, and the fact that an oath was administered. If an interpreter or any other person assisted, their identity should be noted as required. Marcus should not record Rosa's medical diagnosis or other sensitive content beyond a general document description. He should keep the entry for the retention period required by the program. The journal should match the certificate and should not describe the act as an acknowledgment if he actually administered an oath.