Lease Classification and Measurement With a Purchase Option
On January 1, Year 1, Harbor Freight Logistics (lessee) enters a 5-year lease for a warehouse. Payments are $100,000 per year, due at the beginning of each year. The lease includes an option to purchase the warehouse at the end of Year 5 for $450,000; the estimated fair value at that date is $700,000. Harbor is reasonably certain to exercise the option because the warehouse is central to its operations and relocation costs are prohibitive. The rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable; Harbor's incremental borrowing rate is 5%. The warehouse has an estimated remaining useful life of 12 years. Initial direct costs are $15,000. Harbor receives a $20,000 lease incentive from the lessor.
1. Classify the lease for both lessee and lessor and explain the criteria that drive the conclusion.
Read the worked answer
For the lessee, the lease is a finance lease. The reasonably certain purchase option means the lease transfers ownership (or, under ASC 842, the lessee is deemed to obtain control) by the end of the term. The lease term includes the option period because exercise is reasonably certain. The present value of payments plus the option price will approximate fair value, and the lease term plus option covers a major part of the 12-year economic life. Any one finance-lease criterion is sufficient.
For the lessor, classification depends on whether the lease transfers substantially all risks and rewards. The purchase option at $450,000 versus $700,000 fair value is a bargain, so the lease meets the sales-type criteria if the collectibility and no-uncertainty conditions are met. If those are not met, it is a direct financing lease. The key judgment: the lessee's reasonably certain exercise is strong evidence the lessor expects to transfer the asset.
2. Compute the initial lease liability and right-of-use asset.
Read the worked answer
Because payments are an annuity due, discount 5 payments of $100,000 at 5%, plus the $450,000 purchase option discounted 5 years.
Annuity due factor for 5 periods at 5%: 1 + PV of 4-period ordinary annuity = 1 + 3.54595 = 4.54595. PV of payments = $454,595.
PV of option: $450,000 / 1.05^5 = $450,000 / 1.27628 = $352,588.
Lease liability = $454,595 + $352,588 = $807,183.
ROU asset = liability + initial direct costs + prepaid rent - lease incentives = $807,183 + $15,000 - $20,000 = $802,183. (No prepaid rent because the first payment is at commencement and is already in the annuity-due PV.)
Because the lease transfers ownership via the purchase option, Harbor amortizes the ROU asset over the 12-year useful life, not the 5-year term, which materially lowers annual amortization.
3. How would the answer change if Harbor were only 'not reasonably certain' to exercise the option?
Read the worked answer
If exercise is not reasonably certain, the option is excluded from the lease term and the liability. The lease liability becomes the PV of 5 payments only: $454,595. The ROU asset is $454,595 + $15,000 - $20,000 = $449,595, amortized over the 5-year lease term (shorter than 12-year life) because ownership does not transfer. Classification also flips: without the ownership transfer, Harbor must test the other criteria (term vs. life, PV vs. fair value, specialized asset). Five years of a 12-year life is not a major part, and we lack fair value, so the lease would likely be an operating lease with a single lease cost on a straight-line basis. The judgment about 'reasonably certain' changes classification, measurement, and expense pattern simultaneously.