CSSC MBB study materials
CSSC MBB study resources

CSSC MBB cheat sheet

CSSC MBB · Keep the key ideas within reach.

Quick reference

Six Sigma Body of Knowledge - Core Concepts, DMAIC and Lean Integration

  • DMAIC phases: Define (charter, VOC, CTQ, SIPOC), Measure (baseline capability, MSA), Analyze (root cause verification), Improve (solution selection, pilot), Control (SPC, response plan, handover).

  • DPMO = (defects / (units × opportunities)) × 1,000,000; process sigma is the Z-value of the defect rate shifted by 1.5 sigma in the classic Six Sigma convention.

  • Rolled throughput yield RTY = product of each process step's first-pass yield; a 5-step process at 95% each yields RTY ≈ 0.77.

  • COPQ categories: prevention, appraisal, internal failure, external failure; only prevention and appraisal are cost-of-good-quality investments.

  • Lean's eight wastes (TIMWOODS): Transport, Inventory, Motion, Waiting, Overproduction, Over-processing, Defects, Skills underuse.

  • Kaizen, 5S, kanban, poka-yoke and value stream mapping are Lean tools used inside DMAIC Improve/Control, not replacements for it.

  • CTQ tree translates a vague VOC statement into measurable, specified characteristics with target and specification limits.

  • Project charter scope rule: one problem, one metric, one owner, one timebox (typically 3–6 months for a Black Belt project).

Quick reference

Six Sigma Body of Knowledge - Project Management and Team Leadership

  • Charter elements: business case, problem/opportunity statement, goal statement (SMART), scope with in/out lists, milestones, team roles, sponsor sign-off.

  • RACI assigns Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed; exactly one Accountable per deliverable prevents diffusion of ownership.

  • Stakeholder analysis grid: power vs. interest; high-power/high-interest stakeholders get manage-closely engagement, low/low get monitor.

  • Tuckman stages - Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing, Adjourning - predict team conflict timing and required leader behavior.

  • Gate reviews at D-M-A-I-C boundaries require deliverable evidence; a failed gate returns the team to the prior phase rather than proceeding.

  • Work breakdown structure decomposes scope into work packages of 8–80 hours; the critical path is the longest duration path with zero float.

  • Black Belt role: full-time change agent coaching Green Belts; Champion removes barriers and owns resources; Master Black Belt governs methodology and portfolio.

Quick reference

Six Sigma Body of Knowledge - Define Phase and Voice of the Customer

  • VOC sources: complaints, surveys, warranty data, interviews, field observation; Kano model classifies must-be, performance and delighter requirements.

  • SIPOC maps Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, Customers at high level; it defines project boundaries before detailed mapping.

  • Problem statement rules: describes observed gap with data, no cause, no solution, no blame; quantified magnitude and time frame included.

  • Goal statement must be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-bound, and tied to the business case (often COPQ or customer metric).

  • Affinity diagram and multi-voting organize raw customer statements into themes before CTQ selection.

  • Project selection matrix scores candidate projects on customer impact, COPQ, feasibility, and strategic alignment to rank the portfolio.

  • Define-phase tollgate evidence: signed charter, SIPOC, VOC/CTQ list, stakeholder map, baseline data plan.

Quick reference

Six Sigma Body of Knowledge - Measure Phase: Data, MSA and Capability

  • Data types: continuous (variable) vs. discrete (attribute: nominal, ordinal); continuous data needs far smaller samples for the same power.

  • Measurement system analysis: repeatability = equipment variation, reproducibility = appraiser variation; %GRR under 10% acceptable, over 30% unacceptable.

  • Gage R&R %GRR = (GRR standard deviation / total or tolerance) × 100; use tolerance-based when the spec matters, study-based when process variation matters.

  • Attribute agreement analysis reports within-appraiser and between-appraiser agreement; kappa near 1 means agreement beyond chance.

  • Cp = (USL − LSL) / 6σ; Cpk = min(USL − μ, μ − LSL) / 3σ; Cpk penalizes centering, Cp does not.

  • Pp/Ppk use overall (long-term) standard deviation; Cp/Cpk use within-subgroup (short-term) sigma.

  • Sample size for a mean: n = (Z × σ / E)²; for a proportion: n = Z²p(1−p)/E².

  • Baseline capability and DPMO are locked in Measure; they are the reference for proving improvement in Control.

Quick reference

Six Sigma Body of Knowledge - Analyze Phase: Statistics and Root Cause

  • Hypothesis test logic: H0 assumes no difference; p-value < α rejects H0; α is the producer's risk of false alarm (Type I), β is the consumer's risk of missed effect (Type II).

  • Test selection by data: 2-level means t-test, multiple means ANOVA, variances F-test or Levene, proportions chi-square, paired data paired t-test.

  • Normality check precedes parametric tests: Anderson-Darling or Shapiro-Wilk p > 0.05 supports normality; otherwise use nonparametric alternatives (Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis).

  • Correlation r measures linear association (−1 to 1); regression y = b0 + b1x quantifies effect; R² is the fraction of variation explained, not causation.

  • Multi-vari study separates positional, cyclical and temporal variation; it narrows the search before formal testing.

  • FMEA: RPN = Severity × Occurrence × Detection; high severity items are acted on regardless of RPN score.

  • 5 Whys and fishbone (Ishikawa) generate candidate causes; causes are verified with data, never accepted on opinion alone.

Quick reference

Six Sigma Body of Knowledge - Improve Phase: Design of Experiments and Solutions

  • OFAT (one-factor-at-a-time) cannot detect interactions; factorial designs estimate main effects and interactions with fewer runs.

  • Full 2^k factorial has 2^k runs; a half-fraction 2^(k−1) uses the defining relation to alias effects, so resolution IV or higher is preferred when interactions matter.

  • Randomization, replication and blocking control nuisance variation; blocking removes known sources such as shift or lot.

  • DOE sequence: screening (fractional factorial) → characterization (response surface) → optimization (steepest ascent, then confirm at predicted optimum).

  • Main effect = change in mean response as a factor moves between levels; interaction means the effect of one factor depends on the level of another.

  • Pilot the chosen solution on a limited scale; confirm the improvement exceeds the measurement error before full deployment.

  • Solution selection matrix weights impact, cost, risk, and implementation time; error-proofing (poka-yoke) ranks above training and procedure as a control.

Quick reference

Six Sigma Body of Knowledge - Control Phase and Lean Six Sigma

  • Control plan lists each CTQ, its specification, measurement method, sample size/frequency, control method, and reaction plan with owner.

  • SPC chart choice: Xbar-R for subgroup n = 2–9, Xbar-S for n ≥ 10, individuals (I-MR) for n = 1; p, np, c, u charts for attribute data.

  • Control limits are ±3 sigma of the plotted statistic from process data, not specification limits; a point outside a limit or a nonrandom run signals special cause.

  • Western Electric rules: 1 point beyond 3σ, 2 of 3 beyond 2σ, 4 of 5 beyond 1σ, 8 in a row on one side - all indicate special-cause variation.

  • Process capability must be re-verified after improvement; Cpk ≥ 1.33 is a common minimum, ≥ 1.67 for critical characteristics.

  • Standardize and document: updated work instructions, training records, control charts, and a response plan define who acts when a signal fires.

  • Project closure transfers ownership to the process owner, verifies realized savings against the business case, and captures lessons learned.

Quick reference

Six Sigma Body of Knowledge - Design for Six Sigma and Quality Systems

  • DFSS methodologies: DMADV (Define, Measure, Analyze, Design, Verify) for new designs; IDOV (Identify, Design, Optimize, Verify) is an alternative roadmap.

  • QFD house of quality converts customer requirements into design characteristics, ranking them by competitive importance and target values.

  • Tolerance design and robust design (Taguchi) minimize sensitivity to noise factors; the loss function is quadratic around the target, not a step at the limits.

  • FMEA in design (DFMEA) precedes process FMEA (PFMEA); both are living documents revised when design or process changes.

  • Quality system standards: ISO 9001 requirements, ISO 14001 environment, IATF 16949 automotive; ISO 9001 does not prescribe Six Sigma methods.

  • Cost of quality rises steeply downstream: a defect found in design costs least, in the field costs most; prevention spend reduces total COQ.

  • Audit types: first-party (internal), second-party (supplier), third-party (certification body); corrective action closes findings with root-cause verification.