CCSLC Mathematics study plan
CCSLC Mathematics · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Mathematical Literacy & Problem Solving
Compute with fractions, decimals, percentages, and ratios in everyday shopping and budgeting contexts without a calculator for simple cases
Convert between units of length, mass, capacity, and currency, and check answers for reasonableness
Translate short word problems into a stated plan (what is known, what is asked, which operation applies) before calculating
Set up and maintain a personal error log that records the mistake type for every wrong item
Your checkpoint
A 20-item mixed numeracy and word-problem set completed under 40 minutes with a written error log classifying each mistake as computation, misread, or strategy
Problem Solving & Mathematical Literacy
Solve multi-step problems involving percentages (discounts, tax, simple interest) and show each intermediate step
Apply ratio and proportion to scaling recipes, mixing quantities, and map scales
Estimate answers first, then compare the estimate with the exact result to catch errors
Identify and name the sub-goal structure of a problem before starting to compute
Your checkpoint
Five worked multi-step solutions, each with an estimate, full working, and a one-sentence check that the answer is reasonable
Problem Solving & Critical Thinking
Interpret tables, bar charts, line graphs, and pie charts, and extract the specific value a question asks for
Distinguish correlation from causation when reading a trend in a graph or news claim
Break unfamiliar problems into smaller solvable parts and record the decomposition in writing
Justify why a chosen method is valid rather than only producing the answer
Your checkpoint
A one-page analysis of three data displays (table, line graph, pie chart) answering four extraction questions and one interpretation question per display
Critical Thinking & Informed Decision Making
Evaluate the strength of a mathematical claim by checking its assumptions, sample, and units
Detect common reasoning traps: misleading averages, truncated axes, percentage-of-percentage errors, and base-rate neglect
Construct a short counter-argument to a flawed numerical claim using correct figures
Rank competing options against stated criteria before choosing
Your checkpoint
A written critique of two flawed numerical claims (one graph-based, one text-based) identifying the specific error and supplying a corrected statement
Informed Decision Making & Mathematical Literacy
Build a household budget from given income and expense figures, including savings and contingency
Compare loan or hire-purchase offers by computing total cost of credit, not just the monthly payment
Weigh unit price against quantity, quality, and waste when choosing between products
State the decision criteria explicitly before comparing options
Your checkpoint
A completed comparison of three financing or purchase options showing total cost, criteria weights, and a justified recommendation
Critical Thinking & Problem Solving
Solve problems involving perimeter, area, and volume in practical contexts such as flooring, paint, and packaging
Use proportional reasoning to check whether a proposed plan is feasible (time, cost, materials)
Test a solution against edge cases and ask whether the answer would still hold if a value doubled or halved
Explain a solution method in plain language to a non-specialist
Your checkpoint
A practical measurement project: calculate materials and cost for painting or flooring a described room, with a written feasibility check
Mathematical Literacy & Critical Thinking & Informed Decision Making
Integrate numeracy, interpretation, and decision making in timed mixed sets
Allocate time across question types and skip-and-return on items that stall
Review the error log and eliminate the two most frequent recurring mistake types
Verify final answers using a second method wherever time allows
Your checkpoint
Two timed 45-minute mixed practice sets scored and reviewed, with a written note on which error types fell and which remain
Problem Solving & Critical Thinking & Informed Decision Making
Complete full-length timed practice under exam conditions without notes
Diagnose remaining weak areas from scored results and target them in short focused bursts
Rehearse the read-plan-estimate-solve-check routine until it is automatic
Confirm readiness by meeting a self-set accuracy threshold across all four domains
Your checkpoint
Two full timed practice papers with a final score sheet broken down by domain and a one-page readiness summary listing remaining risks
Milestones
Week 2: Complete the 20-item numeracy set with at least 80% accuracy and an error log showing fewer than three computation slips
Week 4: Correctly identify the specific flaw in at least four of five flawed claims in a mixed critique exercise
Week 6: Produce a practical measurement and cost plan whose figures reconcile when recomputed independently
Week 8: Score at least 75% overall on a full timed practice paper with no domain below 65%