Comment on remote learning and social skills
In the written Abitur examination in English (Bremen, 300 minutes), you are asked to write a comment for an international school blog. The prompt quotes a fictional article from The Northern Gazette headlined ‘Remote Learning Has Destroyed a Generation’s Social Skills’. The article reports a survey of 1,200 students aged 14–18: 62% said they felt ‘less confident’ speaking in class after two years of hybrid learning; 28% said they had ‘more free time’; only 19% said they ‘preferred’ online lessons. It also quotes Dr. Helen Marsh, a fictional psychologist, who warns of ‘a social deficit that will take years to repair’. Your comment should be 250–300 words, address the blog’s international student audience, and respond to the claim. You have 40 minutes for this part. The task explicitly asks you to avoid a one-sided rant and to use the data responsibly.
1. Formulate a thesis statement for your comment and explain how you will use the survey data without overstating them.
Read the worked answer
Thesis (example): ‘Remote learning did not destroy a generation’s social skills, but it did expose how much classroom confidence depends on practice, feedback and a stable school community; the survey points to a real challenge, not to a lost generation.’
Using the data responsibly: I would quote the figures accurately and distinguish between what they measure and what the headline claims. The survey reports self-perceived confidence, not measured social skills. ‘Less confident speaking in class’ is not the same as ‘unable to interact’. The sample is 1,200 students aged 14–18, but we are not told how they were selected, whether they are representative, or whether there was a baseline before the pandemic. The 28% who had ‘more free time’ and the 19% who ‘preferred’ online lessons also complicate a purely negative narrative.
Language of caution: I would use hedges such as ‘the survey suggests’, ‘this may indicate’ and ‘one possible interpretation is’. I would avoid causal verbs like ‘destroyed’ or ‘caused’ unless the data support them. This does not weaken the comment; it makes it more credible to an international student audience that is likely to spot overgeneralisation.
2. Identify one rhetorical strategy in the article and explain how you would counter it in your comment.
Read the worked answer
Strategy: The headline uses hyperbole and a generational framing: ‘destroyed a generation’s social skills’. The word ‘destroyed’ is absolute and emotionally charged; ‘a generation’ totalises a diverse group. The quotation from Dr. Marsh adds an appeal to authority (‘a social deficit that will take years to repair’), which makes the claim sound scientifically settled even though it is a prediction.
Counter: I would not deny that some students struggled. Instead, I would separate the emotional force of the headline from its evidential basis. I could write: ‘If 62% felt less confident, that is a serious signal for schools. But feeling less confident is not the same as being socially destroyed, and a psychologist’s warning is not a measured outcome.’ I would then offer a competing interpretation: hybrid learning may have reduced practice in a specific situation (whole-class speaking) rather than damaged social skills in general. Finally, I would turn the absolute claim into a question: which students lost confidence, under which conditions, and what would help them recover? This shifts the comment from a rant to an evidence-based response.
3. Write a concluding paragraph (3–4 sentences) and justify your choice of tone for the blog audience.
Read the worked answer
Concluding paragraph (example): ‘The real lesson of the survey is not that a generation is broken, but that confidence is fragile and unevenly distributed. Schools should treat the 62% as a warning about opportunities to speak, not as proof of permanent harm. If we ask which students lost confidence and give them low-stakes ways to practise, we can repair the deficit without turning it into a label. The headline sells a crisis; the data ask for support.’
Justification: The audience is an international school blog, so the tone should be constructive and readable rather than academic or aggressive. The conclusion avoids introducing new evidence, returns to the thesis, and offers a forward-looking proposal. The phrase ‘the headline sells a crisis’ is critical but not hostile; it invites readers to think about media framing. The final sentence is short and memorable, which suits a blog, while the earlier sentences use hedged language (‘suggests’, ‘can’) to remain fair to students who did struggle.