Correct delivery with damage to another interest
A fictional seller delivers the agreed household appliance in the condition required by a valid contract. During the delivery, the seller employee carelessly damages a different item belonging to the buyer. The buyer keeps the correctly delivered appliance and seeks compensation for the separate damage. The exercise states that the relevant conduct is attributable to the seller under the applicable rules but does not supply a full calculation of loss. One learner says that no contractual issue can arise because the appliance itself is not defective. Another automatically proposes undoing the entire sale. Students must distinguish the principal performance, protective duty and possible remedy without inventing facts about a different defect or an unmade declaration.
1. Which distinction matters?
Read the worked answer
A correct principal performance does not eliminate relevant protective duties. Damage to another protected interest can raise a separate damages issue under the applicable conditions.
2. What should the analysis examine?
Read the worked answer
Identify the appropriate claim basis, duty breach, attribution and recoverable loss. Do not assume withdrawal is the only or automatic response when the buyer keeps the agreed performance.