DSST Principles of Advanced English Composition study materials
DSST Principles of Advanced English Composition study resources

DSST Principles of Advanced English Composition cheat sheet

DSST Principles of Advanced English Composition · Keep the key ideas within reach.

Quick reference

Elements of Effective Writing

  • A sentence needs a subject and a finite verb; a fragment lacks one or the other, and a run-on joins two independent clauses with no punctuation or with only a comma (comma splice).

  • Four sentence structures by clause count: simple = 1 independent clause; compound = 2+ independent clauses; complex = 1 independent + 1+ dependent; compound-complex = 2+ independent + 1+ dependent.

  • Coordination joins equal elements with FANBOYS (for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so); subordination ranks ideas with markers such as although, because, when, which, and that.

  • A relative clause beginning with 'that' is restrictive and takes no commas; one beginning with 'which' after a comma is nonrestrictive and can be removed without changing the core claim.

  • Parallelism rule: items in a series, pairs joined by correlatives (either/or, not only/but also), and elements compared with 'than' must share grammatical form.

  • A modifier must sit next to the word it describes; a dangling modifier has no logical noun to attach to (e.g., 'Walking to class, the rain began').

  • Pronoun reference must be unambiguous and agree in number with its antecedent; singular indefinite antecedents (each, everyone, neither) take singular verbs and pronouns.

  • Verb tense should stay consistent within a passage; shift tense only to signal a real change in time, and use past perfect for an event completed before another past event.

  • Conciseness: replace wordy expletives ('there are,' 'it is') and redundant pairs ('advance planning,' 'each and every') with a single direct subject and verb.

Quick reference

Reading and Writing Arguments

  • A claim is the debatable assertion an argument defends; a thesis adds a because-clause reason, making the argument's logic visible to the reader.

  • Evidence types differ in force: statistics show scale, examples show plausibility, expert testimony lends authority, and anecdotes illustrate but rarely prove.

  • Warrant (Toulmin) is the unstated assumption linking evidence to claim; attacking a warrant is often stronger than disputing the data.

  • A qualifier limits a claim's scope (some, most, in general); an unqualified absolute (all, never, always) is easier for an opponent to refute with one counterexample.

  • A rebuttal names the strongest opposing view fairly, then shows why it fails or is outweighed; a straw man misstates the opposition and is a fallacy, not a rebuttal.

  • Fallacies of relevance: ad hominem (attacks the person), appeal to authority (unqualified expert), appeal to popularity (bandwagon), and appeal to emotion replace reasons with distractions.

  • Fallacies of insufficient evidence: hasty generalization (small sample), false dilemma (only two options), post hoc (sequence treated as cause), and circular reasoning (conclusion restated as premise).

  • Induction reasons from specific cases to a probable generalization; deduction applies a general premise to a case, so a valid deduction is only as sound as its premises.

  • Concession signals credibility: 'Although X is true, Y nevertheless follows' acknowledges the opposing point while keeping the writer's claim as the main clause.

Quick reference

Using Secondary Sources

  • Primary sources are original artifacts or data (the study, the speech, the letter); secondary sources analyze or interpret primary material, and the exam asks you to use secondary sources responsibly.

  • A source must be both relevant (bears on the specific claim) and credible (author expertise, publisher, date, methodology); recency matters most in fast-changing fields.

  • Paraphrase restates a source's idea in your own sentence structure and words; patchwriting (swapping a few synonyms while keeping the original syntax) still counts as plagiarism.

  • A direct quotation must be word-for-word, enclosed in quotation marks, and followed by a citation; changes inside a quote use brackets for insertions and ellipsis for omissions.

  • Common knowledge (widely known facts available in many sources) needs no citation; a specific statistic, a distinctive interpretation, or another's wording always does.

  • Summary compresses a source's whole argument; paraphrase restates one passage; quotation preserves exact wording - choose quotation when the phrasing itself is evidence.

  • Integrating a source requires a signal phrase naming the author and a follow-up sentence explaining how the evidence supports your claim; a dropped-in quote without commentary is ineffective.

  • MLA in-text citation gives author and page (Smith 42) with no comma; APA gives author, year, and page for quotes (Smith, 2020, p. 42).

  • An annotated bibliography entry summarizes the source, evaluates its credibility and bias, and states how it will be used in the writer's argument.