Estonian Upper-Secondary English Exam study materials
Estonian Upper-Secondary English Exam study resources

Estonian Upper-Secondary English Exam cheat sheet

Estonian Upper-Secondary English Exam · Keep the key ideas within reach.

Quick reference

Reading Comprehension

  • Question types on the Estonian upper-secondary exam: true/false with justification, multiple choice, gap-fill from a word bank, matching headings to paragraphs, and short open answers in Estonian or English depending on the task instruction.

  • Skim for structure first: title, subheadings, first and last sentence of each paragraph. Estonian informational texts typically place the main claim in the opening paragraph and the conclusion or recommendation at the end.

  • Scan for the exact wording of names, numbers, dates and place names; distractors usually reuse text vocabulary but alter one detail (a year, a negation, a comparative).

  • A statement is false only if the text contradicts it; if the text is silent, the correct label is 'not stated' rather than 'false' when that option is offered.

  • For gap-fill tasks, decide the missing word's part of speech and grammatical form (tense, number, case ending) before choosing from the bank; the bank often contains two words of the same meaning but different form.

  • Inference questions ask what the writer implies, not what the reader believes; the answer must be supported by at least one explicit sentence in the passage.

  • Vocabulary-in-context items: substitute each option into the sentence and check that the surrounding clause still makes sense; Estonian prefix and suffix patterns (e- , -lik, -mine) signal meaning shifts.

  • Time allocation guide: roughly 1.5 minutes per item plus 3-4 minutes to read each passage; leave open-ended answers for last because they take longest to phrase.

Quick reference

Listening Comprehension

  • Typical task formats: multiple choice with three options, true/false statements, matching speakers to statements, and completing notes or a table with a few words.

  • The audio is usually played twice; on the first listening identify the topic and the speakers' attitudes, on the second confirm specific numbers, names and negations.

  • Distractors are built by mentioning an option and then rejecting or correcting it ('I thought it was Tuesday, but actually the deadline is Thursday'); the correction is the answer.

  • Numbers, prices, times and dates are frequently self-corrected; note both the first and second figure and choose the one the speaker settles on.

  • Signal words mark the answer location: however, actually, in fact, the problem is, what matters is, on the other hand, so, therefore, to sum up.

  • Note-taking shorthand: use abbreviations and symbols (↑ increase, ↓ decrease, ≠ not, → leads to) rather than full words, so writing does not compete with listening.

  • Read the questions before the first playing and predict the expected answer type (a place, a reason, a number); this primes recognition of the relevant phrase.

  • Speaker-attitude items turn on intonation and hedges (probably, I suppose, not really); a flat 'That's great' can signal sarcasm or disappointment.

Quick reference

Writing

  • Two main task types: a transactional letter or e-mail (asking for information, complaining, applying, inviting) and an opinion or argument essay of roughly 150-200 words.

  • Register rule: formal writing avoids contractions, slang and exclamation marks, uses full forms (do not, I would like) and a neutral closing (Yours sincerely / Best regards).

  • Letter structure: greeting, opening sentence stating purpose, body paragraphs each covering one point, closing sentence with a request or next step, sign-off.

  • Essay structure: introduction with a clear thesis, two body paragraphs each with a topic sentence plus support or example, conclusion restating the position without new arguments.

  • Cohesion is assessed: use a range of linkers (however, moreover, whereas, consequently, in addition, on balance) but avoid starting every sentence with the same connector.

  • Grammar accuracy counts more than ambition: controlled complex sentences (relative clauses, conditionals, passive) score higher than long sentences with broken agreement.

  • Estonian-influenced errors to check: article use (a/the), present perfect versus past simple, subject-verb agreement, and prepositions after verbs (depend on, interested in).

  • Word-count discipline: staying within about 10 percent of the required length; under-length answers lose content points even when the language is correct.

Quick reference

Language Use (Grammar and Vocabulary)

  • Tense choice rule: present perfect for past action with present relevance or unspecified time; past simple for a finished time (yesterday, in 2019, last week).

  • Conditionals: zero (if + present, present), first (if + present, will), second (if + past, would), third (if + had + past participle, would have + past participle).

  • Passive formation: be + past participle, with the tense carried by 'be' (is made, was made, has been made, will be made); the agent takes 'by'.

  • Reported speech backshift: present becomes past, will becomes would, can becomes could; pronouns and time expressions shift (today becomes that day, tomorrow becomes the following day).

  • Word-formation items test prefixes and suffixes: un- , dis- , in-/im-/ir- for negation; -ment, -tion, -ness, -ity for nouns; -ful, -less, -able, -ive for adjectives; -ly for adverbs.

  • Collocation is the main vocabulary discriminator: make a decision, do research, take part in, pay attention to, heavy rain, strong argument, highly likely.

  • Countable versus uncountable: information, advice, news, furniture and research take no plural -s and no 'a'; use 'a piece of' or 'some' instead.

  • Prepositional patterns: good at, afraid of, responsible for, succeed in, insist on, apologise for, look forward to + -ing form.

  • Gap-fill strategy: read the whole sentence first, identify the grammatical slot, then eliminate options that fail agreement, tense or collocation before judging meaning.