EPSO Lawyer-Linguist flashcards
EPSO Lawyer-Linguist · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Regulation (EU)
- Under Art. 288 TFEU, a legal act of general application that is binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States without national transposition.
- Directive (EU)
- Under Art. 288 TFEU, a legal act binding on Member States as to the result to be achieved, while leaving national authorities the choice of form and methods.
- Decision (EU)
- Under Art. 288 TFEU, a legal act binding in its entirety on those to whom it is addressed; may be addressed to Member States or to individuals.
- Preliminary ruling
- Art. 267 TFEU procedure in which the Court of Justice interprets EU law or rules on validity at the request of a national court, ensuring uniform application.
- Plaumann test
- Standing test for annulment under Art. 263 TFEU: a natural or legal person must be directly and individually concerned, i.e. affected by reason of attributes peculiar to them.
- Acquis communautaire
- The accumulated body of EU law, rights, obligations and shared objectives that candidate countries must accept and implement before accession.
- Subsidiarity
- Art. 5(3) TEU principle: in areas of non-exclusive competence, the EU acts only if objectives cannot be sufficiently achieved by Member States and can be better achieved at EU level.
- Proportionality
- Art. 5(4) TEU principle: EU action must not exceed what is necessary to achieve the objectives of the Treaties; applies to all EU action, including exclusive competence.
- Supremacy of EU law
- Judge-made principle established in Costa v ENEL (1964): EU law prevails over conflicting national law; it is not expressly stated in the Treaties.
- Direct effect
- Principle from Van Gend en Loos (1963): clear, unconditional and sufficiently precise Treaty provisions can be invoked by individuals before national courts.
- Recital (whereas clause)
- Prefatory paragraph in an EU legal act setting out reasons and context; it aids interpretation but has no independent binding force separate from the operative provisions.
- Shall vs may
- In EU legal English, 'shall' imposes a binding obligation, 'may' confers discretion, and 'should' is a non-binding recommendation; the distinction must survive translation.
- Defined term consistency
- A term defined in the source (e.g. 'controller') must receive one fixed target-language equivalent throughout the text, even where stylistic variation would be preferred.
- Legal effect over form
- Translation rule for legal texts: preserve the normative effect of the source; restructure syntax where a literal rendering would change the scope of an obligation.
- Mutatis mutandis
- Latin phrase meaning 'with the necessary changes made'; in EU texts it signals that a provision applies by analogy, adapted as required, and is usually retained untranslated.
- IATE
- The EU's interinstitutional terminology database, covering all official languages; the primary reference for consistent rendering of EU legal and technical terms.
- EUR-Lex
- Official online portal giving access to EU law in all authentic language versions; used to verify the exact wording and citation of an instrument.
- Interinstitutional Style Guide
- EU publication setting out drafting and presentation conventions (abbreviations, capitalisation, citation formats) for texts in all official languages.
- Authentic language versions
- Under EU law, all language versions of a legislative act are equally authentic; interpretation must compare versions where a term is ambiguous in one.
- One idea per sentence
- EU drafting convention: split long source sentences where the target language cannot carry the same subordination without loss of clarity.
- Shall for obligation only
- In English EU drafting, 'shall' expresses obligation; futurity is expressed with 'will'. Misusing 'shall' for the future creates spurious obligations.
- Gender-neutral drafting
- Drafting practice avoiding default masculine forms: use 'they' or repeat the noun in English; use inclusive forms in gendered languages where the referent is unspecified.
- Date format conventions
- EU English writes '1 January 2020'; French '1er janvier 2020'; German '1. Januar 2020'. Punctuation and ordinal markers follow target-language convention.
- Decimal separator conventions
- English uses a point (3.14); French and German use a comma (3,14). Thousands separators are the inverse; convert consistently within a text.
- Terminology consistency rule
- Within a single text, a term introduced once must be repeated rather than varied for stylistic reasons; consistency outranks elegance in legal drafting.
- Quotation mark conventions
- EU English uses double curly quotes (“ ”); French uses guillemets « »; German uses „ “. Source punctuation must not be carried into the target.
- Verbal reasoning: cannot be determined
- Answer choice correct when the passage neither supports nor contradicts the statement; outside knowledge and plausibility must not be used to decide.
- Quantifier shift trap
- Verbal reasoning trap where 'all', 'some' or 'none' changes between passage and statement; the statement is false if its quantifier is not supported.
- Percentage change formula
- Percentage change = (new value − old value) / old value × 100. Percentage points measure the arithmetic difference between two percentages, not a relative change.
- Compound growth formula
- Compound growth over n periods = P × (1 + r)^n; simple growth = P × (1 + n·r). Identify which the question requires before computing.
- Weighted mean
- Weighted mean = Σ(value × weight) / Σweight. Used when groups of different sizes are combined; the unweighted mean of group means is usually wrong.
- Median vs mean
- Median is the middle value after sorting; mean is sum divided by count. The median is unaffected by extreme values, the mean is not.