EPSO Lawyer-Linguist study plan
EPSO Lawyer-Linguist · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Translation into the target language (legal texts) & Legal terminology and EU law knowledge
Build a personal glossary of 60 core EU legal terms (e.g. acquis communautaire, subsidiarity, proportionality, direct effect) in the target language, recording source term, target equivalent, source of the equivalent and a one-line usage note.
Translate two short EU-style legal excerpts (about 250 words each: one recital, one operative article) into the target language under timed conditions, then self-revise against a checklist of accuracy, terminology consistency and register.
Map the structure of a typical EU regulation and directive (title, citations, recitals, articles, annexes) and note the target-language conventions for each part.
Diagnose your baseline by taking one timed verbal-reasoning set and one numerical-reasoning set and logging error types (misread, calculation, time pressure).
Your checkpoint
A 60-entry bilingual terminology table plus a written self-assessment listing your three weakest translation habits with one corrective action each.
Translation into the target language (legal texts) & Legal terminology and EU law knowledge
Translate three legal text types (a contract clause, a court judgment extract, a legislative recital) of about 300 words each, applying the glossary and flagging every term you had to research.
Explain in writing, in the target language, the difference between regulations, directives and decisions, and between the ordinary and special legislative procedures.
Practise handling false friends and calques in legal language by compiling 25 pairs with corrected target-language renderings and example sentences.
Complete two timed verbal-reasoning sets and review every incorrect answer to identify the reasoning step that failed.
Your checkpoint
Three revised translations totalling about 900 words with a tracked-changes revision log showing at least 10 substantive self-corrections.
Translation into the target language (legal texts) & Linguistic and drafting ability in the target language
Translate a 500-word judgment extract into the target language in 90 minutes, then compare your version against the source for fidelity, cohesion and target-language naturalness.
Rewrite 15 awkward sentences from your own earlier translations to eliminate source-language interference (word order, nominalisations, passive overuse).
Apply a punctuation and capitalisation style sheet for legal drafting in the target language to two of your translations and record each change.
Draft a 200-word explanatory note in the target language summarising the legal effect of the translated judgment extract.
Your checkpoint
One polished 500-word translation plus a revision report classifying your errors by type (terminology, grammar, syntax, register) with counts.
Translation into the target language (legal texts) & Legal terminology and EU law knowledge & Verbal and numerical reasoning (EPSO computer-based tests)
Complete a full mock translation task (about 600 words, legal text, 120 minutes, no dictionary beyond your own glossary) and score it against a self-made rubric covering accuracy, terminology, grammar and style.
Consolidate EU law knowledge on the Court of Justice of the EU: composition, types of proceedings, preliminary ruling procedure and the effect of judgments, summarised in the target language.
Run two timed numerical-reasoning sets focusing on percentages, ratios and table interpretation, and record accuracy and average time per question.
Identify and drill your five most frequent terminology errors from weeks 1 to 3.
Your checkpoint
A scored mock translation with rubric marks per criterion and a one-page EU-law summary sheet in the target language.
Legal terminology and EU law knowledge & Linguistic and drafting ability in the target language
Write a 400-word analytical text in the target language on a current EU law topic (e.g. the rule of law framework), using precise legal terminology and correct citation conventions.
Test your EU-law knowledge with 40 self-written recall questions on institutional law, fundamental rights and the internal market, and correct every wrong answer with a sourced note.
Edit a peer or sample legal text for register and clarity, producing a clean version plus a list of the edits and their justification.
Review target-language grammar points that most affect legal drafting (subjunctive, conditional, modal verbs, agreement) and drill 30 targeted exercises.
Your checkpoint
A 400-word analytical essay in the target language plus a 20-item error log from the recall test with corrected statements.
Translation into the target language (legal texts) & Linguistic and drafting ability in the target language & Verbal and numerical reasoning (EPSO computer-based tests)
Translate a 700-word legal text under exam conditions in 120 minutes and self-mark against the rubric, aiming to improve your week 4 score on at least two criteria.
Do a cohesion pass on two translations: check referents, connectors, paragraph order and consistent terminology throughout.
Complete three timed verbal-reasoning sets and two numerical sets, tracking accuracy and time per item across sessions.
Proofread your own work using a fixed three-pass method (meaning, terminology, surface) and document the errors each pass caught.
Your checkpoint
A timed 700-word translation with rubric scores compared side by side against week 4, showing measurable improvement.
Translation into the target language (legal texts) & Legal terminology and EU law knowledge & Linguistic and drafting ability in the target language & Verbal and numerical reasoning (EPSO computer-based tests)
Sit a full simulated exam day: one 120-minute translation, one terminology and EU-law section, and one verbal plus one numerical reasoning section, all timed and without aids.
Mark the simulation with the rubric and produce a prioritised list of the five gaps that cost the most marks.
Rehearse time allocation for each section and write a minute-by-minute exam-day plan.
Review the glossary and delete or correct any entry you cannot justify with a reliable source.
Your checkpoint
A complete simulated exam with section scores, a ranked gap list and a written time-allocation plan.
Translation into the target language (legal texts) & Legal terminology and EU law knowledge & Linguistic and drafting ability in the target language & Verbal and numerical reasoning (EPSO computer-based tests)
Close the top three gaps from week 7 with focused drills: 10 short translation passages, 30 terminology flashcards and 20 reasoning questions per gap area.
Do two final timed translation passages of about 400 words each, applying the three-pass proofreading method.
Re-take the weakest reasoning section and compare accuracy and timing with week 7.
Finalise a one-page exam-day reference sheet (terminology, style rules, time plan) and confirm logistics.
Your checkpoint
A final one-page exam-day reference sheet plus a before-and-after score comparison for your three weakest areas.
Milestones
Week 2: You can translate a 300-word legal text with no unresolved terminology gaps and have a 60-entry glossary you actually use.
Week 4: Your mock translation scores at least 60% on your rubric, and you have a written EU-law summary sheet you can recall from.
Week 6: Your timed translation score improves on at least two rubric criteria compared with week 4, and reasoning accuracy is stable under time pressure.
Week 7: Full simulated exam completed within time limits, with a ranked list of no more than five priority gaps.
Week 8: All priority gaps addressed, final reference sheet complete, and scores on the weakest areas measurably higher than in week 7.