Cantabria PAU History of Philosophy flashcards
Cantabria PAU History of Philosophy · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Plato's Theory of Forms
- The doctrine that sensible things are imperfect copies of eternal, immaterial Forms, known by reason rather than sense perception; the Form of the Good is the highest principle.
- Allegory of the Cave
- Plato's image of prisoners mistaking shadows for reality; education is the turning of the soul from sensible images toward the intelligible Forms and the Good.
- Aristotle's four causes
- Material (what it is made of), formal (its essence), efficient (what produces it), and final (its purpose); together they explain why a substance is what it is.
- Act and potency
- Aristotle's pair for explaining change: a thing is potentially what it can become and actually what it already is; the unmoved mover is pure act.
- Augustine on time
- Time is a distension of the mind (distentio animi): the past exists as memory, the present as attention, and the future as expectation, not as independent realities.
- Aquinas's Five Ways
- Five a posteriori arguments for God's existence from motion, causation, contingency, degrees of perfection, and finality; each concludes to a first cause or necessary being.
- Descartes' cogito
- 'I think, therefore I am': the one indubitable truth reached after methodic doubt; even a deceiver cannot make me doubt that I am thinking while I doubt.
- Cartesian dualism
- The view that mind (res cogitans) and body (res extensa) are distinct substances; the mind is unextended and thinking, the body extended and mechanical.
- Hume's fork
- The division of all knowledge into relations of ideas (analytic, certain) and matters of fact (synthetic, probable); only the former are demonstrably true.
- Hume on causation
- We perceive only constant conjunction and priority, never necessary connection; the idea of causal necessity arises from custom or habit, not from reason or observation.
- Kant's Copernican revolution
- The hypothesis that objects must conform to our cognition rather than cognition to objects; space, time, and the categories are a priori conditions of possible experience.
- Synthetic a priori
- A judgment that is ampliative (synthetic) yet independent of experience (a priori), such as 'every event has a cause'; Kant argues these make mathematics and natural science possible.
- Categorical imperative
- Kant's unconditional moral law: act only on maxims you could will as universal laws, and treat humanity always as an end, never merely as a means.
- Marx's historical materialism
- The thesis that the mode of production of material life conditions social, political, and intellectual life; social being determines consciousness, not the reverse.
- Marx's alienation
- Under capitalism workers are estranged from the product, the labor process, their species-being, and other people; communism aims to overcome this estrangement.
- Surplus value
- The difference between the value produced by labor and the wages paid; capital accumulates by extracting this unpaid surplus from workers.
- Nietzsche's will to power
- The fundamental drive of life toward growth, self-overcoming, and creative expansion; it is an interpretive principle rather than a metaphysical substance.
- Master and slave morality
- Nietzsche's contrast between noble valuation of strength and self-affirmation and slave morality's ressentiment-driven revaluation of weakness as goodness.
- Eternal recurrence
- Nietzsche's thought experiment that all events repeat infinitely; affirming it expresses the Übermensch's love of life and overcoming of nihilism.
- Ortega's perspectivism
- Each individual has a unique, partial vantage on reality; truth is not relative but perspectival, and all perspectives together constitute the full reality.
- Vital reason
- Ortega's integration of reason and life: reason must be rooted in vital circumstance, and life must be guided by reason; neither pure rationalism nor vitalism suffices.
- Rebellion of the masses
- Ortega's diagnosis that mass man, product of liberal democracy, demands rights without responsibilities and lacks the historical consciousness needed to sustain civilization.
- Wittgenstein's picture theory
- In the Tractatus, propositions are logical pictures of possible facts; language and world share a logical form, and what cannot be pictured cannot be said.
- Language games
- Wittgenstein's later notion that meaning is use within rule-governed practices; different forms of life embed different language games with their own criteria of correctness.
- Private language argument
- Wittgenstein's argument that a language referring only to private sensations is impossible, since meaning requires public criteria and agreement in a form of life.
- Heidegger's Dasein
- The human way of being, characterized as being-in-the-world; authenticity involves confronting being-toward-death and resolutely owning one's possibilities.
- Sartre's bad faith
- The self-deception of denying one's radical freedom by adopting fixed roles or excuses; authenticity requires owning one's freedom and responsibility.
- Husserl's intentionality
- The thesis that consciousness is always consciousness of something; the epoché brackets the natural attitude to disclose the essential structures of experience.
- Is/ought gap
- Hume's observation that descriptive premises about what is cannot by themselves entail prescriptive conclusions about what ought to be, without an added normative premise.
- Reductio ad absurdum
- A proof strategy that assumes the negation of the target claim and derives a contradiction, thereby establishing the claim's truth by eliminating its alternative.
- Necessary and sufficient conditions
- A conceptual analysis specifies conditions that are jointly sufficient and individually necessary for applying a term; counterexamples test whether the analysis is adequate.
- Quid facti vs. quid juris
- Kant's distinction between the factual question of how we come to have a cognition and the normative question of what justifies its claim to validity.