Madrid PAU Technical Drawing Applied to Arts and Design II study materials
Madrid PAU Technical Drawing Applied to Arts and Design II study resources

Madrid PAU Technical Drawing Applied to Arts and Design II: Plane geometry and geometric constructions applied to design

Madrid PAU Technical Drawing Applied to Arts and Design II · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Plane geometry and geometric constructions applied to design

This domain opens the Madrid PAU paper with a construction exercise: a proportion, a regular polygon, an oval or a graphic scale. The exam tests compass-and-straightedge reasoning, so the mark depends on visible construction lines (arcs left in place, labelled points, clean intersections) and not on a figure measured with the ruler.

Core rules

  • Thales / proportionality: to divide AB into n equal parts, draw a ray from A, step off n equal compass units, join the last point to B and draw parallels through the other marks.
  • Media proporcional: in a right triangle the altitude on the hypotenuse satisfies h² = m·n; alternatively use the semicircle on the sum of the two segments.
  • Golden section: locate C on AB with AB/AC = AC/CB = φ ≈ 1.618; the golden rectangle and modular layouts are built from it.
  • Regular polygons given the side: general method - raise the perpendicular at one end, strike an arc of radius equal to the side, divide it into n parts and take the second division as the circumcentre.
  • Ovals and ovoides: four-centre constructions; every tangency point lies on the line joining the two centres involved.

Worked example: golden section of AB = 50 mm

Raise the perpendicular at B, mark D with BD = 25 mm (half the segment), and draw AD = √(50² + 25²) = 55.9 mm. With centre D and radius 25 mm, cut AD at E: AE = 55.9 − 25 = 30.9 mm. With centre A and radius AE, cut AB, giving AC = 30.9 mm. Check: 30.9 × 1.618 = 50 mm, so C divides AB in the golden ratio; the same radius gives the side of the regular decagon inscribed in that radius.

Traps that cost marks

Erasing construction arcs (they are evidence of the method); confusing media proporcional with tercera/cuarta proporcional; constructing a polygon on the side but measuring the radius with the ruler; leaving the tangency points of an oval unmarked; drawing the golden rectangle from the diagonal instead of from the section; rounding to the millimetre in a construction that is exact by geometry.

In design questions the same tools reappear (grids, logos, typographic modules), so always name the geometric property that justifies the result.