Escrow Officer study materials
Escrow Officer study resources

Changed settlement instructions near closing

Escrow Officer · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Changed settlement instructions near closing

A fictional settlement team receives a message changing the destination account for a scheduled payment. The message correctly identifies the borrower and property, uses a familiar display name and says that closing will be delayed unless the account is changed immediately. The approved instructions show different bank details. An established independent verification process is available, including previously known contact information and required authorization. A team member proposes replying to the same message to authenticate it, while another proposes using the approved process despite the time pressure. No evidence yet establishes whether the request is genuine or fraudulent. Students must distinguish knowledge of transaction details from authority to change payment instructions, preserve the records and explain an appropriate escalation without inventing a universal bank guarantee or statutory deadline.

1. What does the message prove?

Read the worked answer

It proves that a change was requested, not that the request is authenticated. Correct transaction details and a familiar display name do not independently verify the destination account.

2. What should happen next?

Read the worked answer

Use the established independent verification and approval process with known contact information, escalate the timing issue and retain the evidence. Do not authenticate the change solely through the same potentially compromised channel.