EIP study plan
EIP · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Enterprise Architecture and Integration
Diagram the layered enterprise architecture stack (business, application, data, technology) and place each integration component on the correct layer.
Compare request-response, event-driven publish-subscribe, file/batch transfer, and shared-database integration styles, then select one style for three stated business scenarios and justify each choice in writing.
Define at least 15 core integration terms - ESB, API gateway, canonical message model, orchestration versus choreography, idempotency, service registry - and pair each with a concrete usage example.
Trace one end-to-end business transaction across five systems and annotate every handoff with its protocol, data contract, and failure mode.
Your checkpoint
A one-page architecture reference sheet containing at least 15 labeled components and three scenario write-ups that each name the chosen integration style, the rejected alternatives, and the deciding constraint.
Enterprise Architecture and Integration & Data Management and Analytics
Construct a canonical data model that reconciles two source systems and document field-level source-to-target mappings, including type and nullability differences.
Evaluate synchronous versus asynchronous messaging for a given flow and specify retry policy, idempotency keys, ordering guarantees, and dead-letter handling.
Compare normalized warehouse, lakehouse, and data-virtualization approaches against a stated latency, cost, and governance requirement set.
Assess a sample dataset against the six data-quality dimensions and record which defects would break downstream integration contracts.
Your checkpoint
A mapping specification covering at least 20 mapped fields plus a one-page design decision record stating the chosen integration pattern, the messaging controls, and the storage architecture with rationale.
Data Management and Analytics
Design a star schema for a defined reporting question, declaring the fact grain, at least three dimensions, and the slowly changing dimension handling for two of them.
Interpret ten SQL patterns covering multi-table joins, aggregation, window functions, and null handling, and predict each result set before verifying it.
Contrast batch, change-data-capture, and streaming ingestion on latency, cost, complexity, and recovery behavior, and recommend one per scenario.
Specify the governance artifacts for a data asset: catalog entry fields, lineage from source to report, steward ownership, and a retention and archival rule.
Your checkpoint
A data model diagram with one fact table and at least three dimensions, accompanied by a written lineage path covering two pipelines from source system through transformation to consuming report.
Security, Risk, and Compliance & Enterprise Architecture and Integration
Distinguish authentication from authorization and trace how OAuth 2.0, OIDC, and SAML assertions are issued, validated, and propagated across an integration boundary.
Threat-model an API-mediated integration with STRIDE and list at least six threats, each paired with a preventive or detective control.
Map three data-classification tiers to concrete encryption, masking, key-management, and logging requirements.
Complete a 40-question mixed diagnostic across Domains 1 and 2 and convert every missed item into a dated remediation task.
Your checkpoint
A STRIDE worksheet naming at least six threats with controls, plus a scored diagnostic result and a prioritized remediation list of no more than ten items.
Security, Risk, and Compliance
Apply least-privilege and role-based versus attribute-based access control to three access scenarios and state the entitlement model each requires.
Translate regulatory and contractual obligations into implementable technical controls, separating what must be enforced in code from what is enforced by process.
Specify audit-log content, immutability, retention period, and non-repudiation evidence for a transaction-processing system.
Build a risk register that scores likelihood and impact, assigns an owner, and selects a treat, transfer, avoid, or accept response for each entry.
Your checkpoint
A risk register with at least ten scored entries, each carrying an owner, a response decision, and at least one mapped technical or procedural control.
Solution Delivery and Governance
Compare waterfall, agile, and hybrid delivery models and select one for a regulated integration program, defending the choice against its main failure mode.
Draft a RACI matrix for a cross-functional release and identify the two handoffs most likely to stall.
Define the approval path for a production change, naming which body reviews architecture impact, which approves the schedule, and which accepts residual risk.
Establish requirements traceability from a business need through design, build, and test case, and demonstrate it for three requirements.
Your checkpoint
A one-page delivery governance model showing the RACI, the full change-approval path with decision rights, and a traceability row for each of three requirements.
Solution Delivery and Governance & Cloud and Infrastructure Operations
Design an environment promotion path from development through test to production and list the automated quality, security, and approval gates at each transition.
Explain infrastructure as code, configuration drift, and immutable infrastructure, and state which artifact type each practice governs.
Select IaaS, PaaS, SaaS, containers, or serverless for three workloads and justify each against operational burden, scaling profile, and portability.
Define SLI, SLO, SLA, and error budget for two services and compute the monthly error budget at a stated availability target.
Your checkpoint
A pipeline stage diagram annotating at least five gates, paired with an SLO sheet for two services giving the indicator, target, measurement window, and computed error budget.
Cloud and Infrastructure Operations & Enterprise Architecture and Integration & Data Management and Analytics & Security, Risk, and Compliance & Solution Delivery and Governance
Diagnose common operational failure modes - capacity exhaustion, autoscaling lag, backup gaps, alert fatigue - and prescribe a monitoring or control fix for each.
Select a disaster-recovery strategy for three scenarios by deriving recovery time and recovery point objectives from stated business impact.
Complete a timed 60-question full-length practice exam under test conditions and tag every incorrect answer to its domain and root cause.
Consolidate a two-page cheat sheet that allocates space across all five domains in proportion to their exam weighting, with Domain 1 receiving the largest share.
Your checkpoint
A recorded full-length practice score with a root-cause table for every missed question and a two-page weighted cheat sheet covering all five domains.
Milestones
Week 2: Explain aloud, without notes, the difference between orchestration and choreography, when a canonical model pays for itself, and how idempotency protects a retried message; if any answer stalls, redo Week 1 goal three before advancing.
Week 4: Score at least 70 percent on the 40-question Domain 1 and Domain 2 diagnostic, with no more than three unresolved remediation items still open at the end of the week.
Week 6: Produce the governance deliverable from memory in under 45 minutes: RACI, change-approval path, and traceability rows, then compare against the Week 6 artifact and log every gap.
Week 8: Achieve a full-length practice score at or above the chosen passing target with every domain at or above 60 percent, and close all items on the remediation list before exam day.