European Baccalaureate Economics study materials
European Baccalaureate Economics study resources

Compulsory Oral: Language vs. Content

European Baccalaureate Economics · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Compulsory Oral: Language vs. Content

Luca is an s7 student who has already chosen his two further written subjects (Economics and Physics) and his two further oral subjects (History and Biology). He must now select his compulsory oral from L1 Italian or L2 English; he cannot choose History through English because he is already taking History as a further oral subject. His A marks are: L1 Italian 9.0, L2 English 7.5. His Pre-Baccalaureate scores are: L1 Italian 8.5, L2 English 7.0. His Italian teacher says he is eloquent but tends to overcomplicate literary analysis. His English teacher says he is fluent but makes grammatical errors under pressure and sometimes struggles to find precise vocabulary. Luca wants to study Law in Italy, where the EB final score is highly competitive. He has three weeks to prepare and must also revise for his other oral exams. He needs to decide which compulsory oral will maximize his final score while managing risk.

1. Which compulsory oral should Luca choose: L1 Italian or L2 English? Justify using expected score, risk, and preparation time.

Read the worked answer

Expected score: Italian is stronger on both A marks (9.0 vs 7.5) and Pre-Bac (8.5 vs 7.0). The L1 Italian oral is likely to yield a score in the 8.5–9.0 range if he prepares, while L2 English is more likely 7.0–7.5. For Law in Italy, where the EB score is competitive, the higher expected score matters.

Risk: Italian carries the risk that he overcomplicates literary analysis and loses marks for clarity. English carries the risk of grammatical errors and vocabulary gaps under pressure. Both risks are manageable, but the Italian risk is about structure, which can be fixed with practice. The English risk is about language accuracy, which is harder to fix in three weeks.

Preparation time: He is already strong in Italian, so he needs less content revision and more practice simplifying his analysis. English would require more work on grammar and vocabulary. Given limited time, Italian is more efficient.

Recommendation: Choose L1 Italian. Prepare by practicing a simplified structure: clear thesis, two or three main points, and a concise conclusion. Use a timer to avoid overcomplicating. This maximizes expected score while managing the main risk.

2. How might Luca's choice change if he were applying to a UK university that requires a pass in English but does not care about the overall score? Explain.

Read the worked answer

If applying to a UK university that requires a pass in English but does not care about the overall score, Luca might choose L2 English. The compulsory oral in English would provide direct evidence of oral proficiency, which could strengthen his application. The lower expected score matters less because the overall EB score is not critical. However, he should still weigh the risk of a poor English oral performance. If he is confident he can pass comfortably, English is a reasonable choice. If not, Italian remains safer. The trade-off is between demonstrating English oral skills and protecting his score. Since the UK requirement is only a pass, and he already has L2 English written, the additional benefit of an English oral is modest; he could still choose Italian and use other parts of his application to demonstrate English. The decision depends on how much he values the oral English evidence versus the risk of a lower grade.