EXIN BCS Gen AI Award study plan
EXIN BCS Gen AI Award · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Generative AI fundamentals, capabilities and limitations
Define generative AI and distinguish it from discriminative and classical machine learning using at least five concrete contrasts you can state from memory
Explain how transformer architectures, tokenisation, embeddings and next-token prediction produce output, and describe the role of training data, fine-tuning and system prompts
Classify at least eight everyday generative AI use cases by modality (text, image, audio, code, multimodal) and by task type (summarise, draft, classify, translate, generate)
Identify the main categories of generative AI capability limits: hallucination, knowledge cut-off, context window, reasoning gaps, arithmetic weakness and non-determinism
Your checkpoint
A one-page concept map plus a 300-word plain-language explainer of how an LLM produces an answer, written without notes and checked against your source material
Generative AI fundamentals, capabilities and limitations
Diagnose why a given generative AI output is wrong by attributing the failure to data, prompt, model or task-fit causes
Compare model families and deployment options (hosted API, private tenant, on-premise, open-weight) on cost, latency, privacy and control
Describe evaluation basics: golden test sets, human review, automated scoring and when each is appropriate
Explain how retrieval augmentation and tool use change the reliability profile of a generative AI system
Your checkpoint
A failure-analysis log of ten real generative AI outputs you produced, each labelled with a root cause, a severity rating and the mitigation you would apply
Prompt design and effective use of generative AI tools
Write prompts that specify role, task, context, constraints, output format and audience for five different business tasks
Apply decomposition and step-by-step instruction to break a complex task into a reliable prompt chain
Use few-shot examples and structured output requests (tables, JSON, bullet schemas) to make results consistent across repeated runs
Set and use system-level instructions and reusable prompt templates that separate fixed rules from variable inputs
Your checkpoint
A personal prompt library of eight tested templates, each with the task it solves, the variables it takes and a note on what you changed after the first attempt
Prompt design and effective use of generative AI tools & Generative AI fundamentals, capabilities and limitations
Iterate on a weak prompt through at least three revision cycles and document what each change improved
Test a single prompt across two or three different models or settings and explain the differences in output quality
Apply grounding techniques: supplying source text, asking for citations to that text and instructing the model to say when it does not know
Recognise and correct prompt anti-patterns such as vague verbs, conflicting constraints, overloaded context and unstated output format
Your checkpoint
A before-and-after case study of one prompt taken from first draft to final version, with all intermediate outputs and a short rationale for each change
Ethical, legal and security considerations of generative AI
Map the main legal exposures of generative AI use: copyright in inputs and outputs, licensing of training data, confidentiality and contractual terms of use
Explain transparency and disclosure obligations, including labelling AI-generated content and the limits of AI detection tools
Identify bias, fairness and accessibility risks in generative AI outputs and describe a review step that reduces them
Describe data protection principles that apply when personal data enters a prompt, including minimisation, lawful basis and cross-border transfer
Your checkpoint
A two-page risk register for one realistic business use case, listing at least eight risks with likelihood, impact, owner and control
Ethical, legal and security considerations of generative AI
Explain prompt injection, data leakage, insecure output handling and model poisoning, and state one concrete control for each
Apply a data classification rule to decide what may never be pasted into a public generative AI tool
Draft acceptable-use guidance covering permitted tools, prohibited data, review requirements and accountability for final output
Describe human-in-the-loop and audit-trail requirements for high-impact generative AI decisions
Your checkpoint
A one-page acceptable-use policy for a fictional organisation plus a five-question checklist staff would use before submitting any prompt
Business application and value of generative AI
Identify and size generative AI opportunities in a chosen business process using a simple value-versus-feasibility screen
Estimate the cost of a generative AI solution including model usage, integration, review labour and ongoing maintenance
Define success metrics that separate adoption measures from outcome measures such as cycle time, rework rate and quality score
Describe how to run a small pilot with a baseline, a control group and a decision gate before scaling
Your checkpoint
A one-page business case for one generative AI initiative covering problem, proposed use, cost estimate, success metrics and a stop-or-scale decision rule
Generative AI fundamentals, capabilities and limitations & Prompt design and effective use of generative AI tools & Ethical, legal and security considerations of generative AI & Business application and value of generative AI
Consolidate all four domains into a single revision sheet of key definitions, risks and prompt techniques
Answer timed practice questions across all domains and review every wrong answer to its underlying concept
Rehearse explaining a generative AI use case to a non-technical stakeholder in under three minutes, covering value, risk and controls
Close remaining knowledge gaps by re-testing the two weakest areas identified in your practice run
Your checkpoint
A timed mock exam result with a written gap-closure note listing each missed concept, the correct explanation and the date you re-tested it
Milestones
Week 2: You can explain from memory how an LLM generates text and name at least six distinct limitation categories with an example of each
Week 4: You can write a structured, constraint-rich prompt for a new task and improve it through iteration without referring to notes
Week 6: You can state the legal, ethical and security risks of a given use case and name a control for each in under ten minutes
Week 8: You score consistently above your own pass threshold on timed mixed-domain practice and have no unexplained gaps left on your revision sheet