EXIN LSSA Six Sigma Black Belt study plan
EXIN LSSA Six Sigma Black Belt · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Lean Six Sigma fundamentals and deployment
Distinguish Lean, Six Sigma, and Lean Six Sigma by writing a one-paragraph definition of each plus two situations where each approach alone would underperform
Map the DMAIC roadmap end to end and label the key deliverables and exit criteria of each phase
Compute DPMO, yield, and process sigma from a defect count and unit count, then convert sigma level to approximate DPMO without a table
Identify at least six common Lean wastes in a process you know and rank them by estimated annual cost or time impact
Explain the roles of Champion, Sponsor, Master Black Belt, Black Belt, Green Belt, and process owner and where they sit in a deployment structure
Your checkpoint
A two-page deployment summary containing a DMAIC roadmap table with phase deliverables and exit criteria, a worked sigma-level calculation with your own numbers, and a waste inventory of at least six items
Lean Six Sigma fundamentals and deployment & Define phase
Evaluate the readiness criteria for launching a Six Sigma initiative, including leadership commitment, linkage to strategy, and resource allocation
Produce a stakeholder analysis that classifies stakeholders by influence and interest and states an engagement action for each group
Write a problem statement that is measurable, time-bound, and free of an embedded cause or solution
Draft a SMART goal statement and a business case that ties the project to financial or customer impact
Draft a team charter and a SIPOC for a real process, identifying at least four customers and their CTQ characteristics
Your checkpoint
A complete project charter package for one real or realistic process: problem statement, SMART goal, business case, scope boundaries, team roles, stakeholder table, and SIPOC with at least four CTQs
Define phase
Translate customer needs into a prioritized list of CTQs with operational definitions and specification limits
Construct a Kano model classification of at least eight customer requirements and explain which drive satisfaction versus dissatisfaction
Build a CTQ tree from a broad customer need down to measurable characteristics
Select the most appropriate tool among VOC collection methods, affinity diagram, and tree diagram for three different scenarios and justify each choice
Define process boundaries and scope exclusions that prevent scope creep in the charter
Your checkpoint
A VOC-to-CTQ package containing a Kano classification table, a CTQ tree with at least three levels, and operational definitions with specification limits for every CTQ
Measure phase
Design a data collection plan that specifies what to measure, how, by whom, when, and the operational definition for each metric
Classify each of your CTQ metrics as continuous or discrete and select the appropriate measurement scale
Perform a Gage R&R interpretation using a provided repeatability and reproducibility output, stating whether the measurement system is acceptable and why
Explain the difference between accuracy, linearity, stability, and precision and give a process example of each
Calculate baseline process capability using Cp and Cpk, and explain what Cpk tells you that Cp does not
Your checkpoint
A measurement system plan and baseline capability summary: data collection plan, metric classification table, a written Gage R&R verdict with reasoning, and calculated Cp and Cpk for at least one continuous CTQ
Measure phase
Construct and interpret a control chart selection guide that matches data type and subgroup size to the correct chart
Build a process map with cycle times and identify where value is added versus where only cost is added
Calculate rolled throughput yield for a multi-step process and compare it with final yield
Distinguish common cause from special cause variation and state the correct management response to each
Compute sample size needs for a given confidence level and margin of error for a proportion
Your checkpoint
A measurement and baseline analysis report containing a control chart selection matrix, a value-added process map with cycle times, a rolled throughput yield calculation, and a written special-cause versus common-cause assessment
Analyze phase
Generate and organize cause hypotheses using a fishbone diagram and a cause-and-effect matrix weighted by customer importance
Build a Pareto chart and apply the 80/20 rule to prioritize the vital few causes
Select the correct hypothesis test for five given scenarios by matching data type, number of groups, and pairing
Interpret a hypothesis test output: state the null and alternative hypotheses, read the p-value, and state the conclusion in process terms
Distinguish statistical significance from practical significance and identify the risks of a Type I versus Type II error in your project
Your checkpoint
An analysis report containing a weighted cause-and-effect matrix, a Pareto chart with a prioritized vital-few list, and a hypothesis test selection table with a worked interpretation of at least one test
Analyze phase & Improve and Control phases
Complete a regression or correlation analysis and interpret slope, R-squared, and residual behavior for a real data set
Verify root causes with data rather than opinion and document the evidence for each confirmed cause
Generate, screen, and select improvement solutions using an impact-effort matrix and a failure mode and effects analysis
Design a pilot or designed experiment to test the chosen solution before full implementation
Plan a control strategy that names the metric, the chart, the reaction plan, and the owner for each critical X
Your checkpoint
A root-cause and solution package: verified causes with evidence, an impact-effort matrix, a failure mode and effects analysis with at least five failure modes and RPN scores, and a pilot plan
Improve and Control phases
Build a control plan that specifies the standard operating procedure, monitoring method, response plan, and audit frequency for each critical process input
Standardize the improved process with a documented procedure and a mistake-proofing device or check
Calculate and present the financial and operational benefit of the project against the original business case
Prepare a project closure and handover package that transfers ownership to the process owner
Assemble a full practice exam review plan that targets your weakest domain based on your own diagnostic results
Your checkpoint
A complete project closure package: control plan, standardized work document, before-and-after capability comparison, benefit calculation against the business case, and a written handover to the process owner
Milestones
Week 2: You can explain the DMAIC roadmap and sigma-level math without notes, and your project charter passes a self-review for a measurable problem statement and a cause-free goal
Week 4: You can compute DPMO, yield, and process sigma from raw counts, and you can state whether a Gage R&R result is acceptable and justify the verdict
Week 5: You can select the correct control chart for a described data set and calculate rolled throughput yield for a three-step process
Week 6: You can match five scenarios to the correct hypothesis test and interpret a p-value in plain process language without error
Week 8: You have a completed closure package and score at least 80 percent on a timed mixed-domain practice set, with no single domain below 70 percent